Quantcast
 
 
 
Courtesy of Toyota
Why Not?: Toyota's new image ad features a free-range Prius made of twigs and mud that slowly melts back into the tundra from whence it came
PROJECT GREEN

Toyota’s Green Problem

Despite the Prius, environmentalists are turning on the carmaker for opposing new gas-mileage laws.

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

When Toyota introduced its Prius hybrid car in America seven years ago, Detroit laughed it off. With gas prices at $1.50 a gallon, they argued, no one would buy it. But Dan Becker embraced the little mileage miser. Then head of the Sierra Club's global-warming project, Becker invented an award to give Toyota: the Sierra Club Award for Excellence in Environmental Design. Then he took the Prius on a 50-city promotional tour. Finally, Becker paid Toyota the ultimate compliment; he bought a Prius. Today, Becker is still driving the car, but he's no longer praising Toyota. Instead, he now calls the automaker a "hypocrite" for siding with Detroit in opposition to tougher new gas-mileage laws. "It's embarrassing to have applauded Toyota for the Prius," says Becker, "and now to see them acting so irresponsibly."

The environmental community has turned on Toyota. First, it quietly castigated the carmaker for joining the Detroit Three in a lawsuit against California over legislation to reduce global-warming gases from cars by 30 percent within a decade, which would require cars to get up to 43 miles per gallon. Opposition increased when Toyota—in contrast to Honda and Nissan—sided with Detroit to try to block legislation currently before Congress to boost fuel economy for all new vehicles to 35mpg by 2020, up from 25mpg today. Toyota, in a familiar Motown refrain, says achieving such a hard target is not technologically feasible. It is pushing softer legislation that gives automakers until 2022 to improve fuel economy and continues giving breaks to big trucks and SUVs. "We haven't changed what we're doing to reduce our environmental footprint," says Toyota's top lobbyist, Josephine Cooper. "But our engineers are scratching their heads, saying, 'How will we get there?' Those are big numbers to achieve."

To the green crowd, though, Toyota is a turncoat. Their cries are reaching a wider audience as oil soars toward $100 a barrel and gas prices top $3 a gallon. Several environmental groups have launched a "How Green Is Toyota?" publicity blitz, which includes a letter-writing campaign they say has clogged the inbox of Toyota's top U.S. exec with more than 100,000 e-mails. In Detroit last month, eco-warriors stormed a Toyota dealership and draped it with a banner showing flag-wrapped coffins beside the slogan "Driving War and Warming." "Is Toyota really committed to being green, or are they just green scamming?" asks Rob Perks of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

How did Toyota go from paragon to pariah so quickly? The fuel-economy debate has laid bare Toyota's broader product strategy, which includes a big new Tundra pickup that gets 14mpg in the city. The 48mpg Prius remains the green standard, controlling half the hybrid market, but it doesn't make money for Toyota, analysts say, because of its complicated and costly gas-electric propulsion system. The Tundra, however, could eventually contribute $10,000 per truck to the bottom line. More important, offering a full lineup of cars, trucks and SUVs is critical to Toyota's goal of becoming the world's No. 1 automaker. (The race is neck and neck: General Motors leads with 7.06 million vehicles sold worldwide so far this year to Toyota's 7.05 million.)

To defend its green street cred, Toyota last week rolled out its most extensive corporate-image ad campaign ever. The centerpiece commercial features a kind of mud-hut Prius being assembled out of twigs, earth and grass by a group of rugged campers. Against a moody mountain backdrop, the Prius slowly disintegrates back into the land, while an announcer says, "Can a car company grow in harmony with the environment? Why not? At Toyota, we're not only working toward cars with zero emissions. We're also striving for zero waste in everything else we do." Toyota execs insist the ad is not a reaction to their critics. "We're part of the greening of America," says Toyota group vice president Steve Sturm. "We want to make America more conscious of that." Ad Age critic Bob Garfield panned the ad, warning, "If the Prius mythology comes to stand not for environmental consciousness but for facile corporate PR, the campaign's irrational exuberance will pop the image bubble."

The ads might already be backfiring. This week at the Los Angeles Auto Show, eco-activists from Freedom From Oil tell NEWSWEEK they are planning to target Toyota by playing off the ads' "Why not?" slogan. With banners strung from the L.A. Convention Center or waved in a Toyota press conference, the protesters say they will ask the automaker "Why not?" drop the lawsuit against California's global-warming law. Toyota's sharpest Congressional critic, Rep. Edward Markey of Massachusetts, also is working the slogan into his broadsides. "They're saying they can't meet the 35mpg standard by 2020," Markey says, "and the American people are asking Toyota, 'Why not?' " Like so many of Toyota's critics these days, Markey is also a customer: He drives a Camry hybrid. But as friends turn into foes, Toyota is discovering it isn't easy being green while going for the green.

© 2007

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: votenic @ 11/26/2007 12:41:27 PM

    Comment: 2008 Presidential Candidate Weekly Poll

  • Posted By: reallivemonkey @ 11/16/2007 6:29:03 PM

    Comment: For those of you who bought into the BS of "Who Killed The Electric Car", you should know that Toyota has come out and said that the movie was essentially a slander campaign against GM and that they also could not sell or lease the mules in California. Better yet, the film's director agrees. (See "Electric Car Killer?" Detroit Free Press 12/20/06)

    As for the rest of the article, it disgusts me when the some group like the Sierra Club, which has no understanding of the physics behind something as complicated as a car, can sway the opinions of masses of people using inane rhetoric. Will we get there with our fuel economy? Undoubtedly. Will it be with technology ready for mass consumption today? NO. Will it be on their imaginary time table? Probably not (for reference, read up on the legislation that forced the automakers to sell the unwanted EV's in the first place and the reason it was ultimately revoked.) In the end that won't matter because SC et al will just say 'I told you so' and 'they could have done this long ago' and everyone will believe it because this country prefers scandal to the boring reality of physics and manufacturing.

    And for those of you that continue to beat the drum of EV's, go do some reasearch on power distribution. Perhaps even think back to California's rolling blackouts of a few years ago. Then come up with an intelligent argument that details how you think getting even 10% of the population into rechargable vehicles won't overload the system. Or how it doesn't contribute to the pollution problem when the majority of our electricity comes from-- tada!-- FOSSIL FUELS.

  • Posted By: MileHighHappy @ 11/16/2007 11:44:13 AM

    Comment: Where do these people live? Somewhere other than the Rocky Mountains. I would like to invite them to visit Colorado during a snowstorm similar to those last winter which at my house we received over three feet of snow. My husband is a hospital administrator and without our "gas guzzling" 4WD SUV, would not have been able to make it to work on the unplowed, snow packed roads. Many personnel who drive half-cars had to be retrieved from their homes by SUVs. Additionally, what do you think emergency personnel drive to work? Bicycles? NO, SUVs. How convenient for Dan Becker - but not those Emergency Rooms. We also use our 4WD vehicle to visit our mountain condo to go skiing, which boosts the local economy and we have it packed to the roof and the skis are on the roof. We???re also summer outdoorsmen. We require 4WD for our mountaineering. I???d love to own a Prius, but I???d have to own three cars. The last time I visited the grocery store, I came home with 18 bags of groceries, two teenagers, their two band instruments, and their sports equipment. Had I driven a half-car, I have had to drive two cars. That wouldn???t save much gas. So before you take away our "gas guzzling" SUV's, Dan, perhaps you should visit a few households with SUVs and look at this from all angles. And ps, Dan, we Colorado Natives were environmentally conscience before environmentalism was cool.

Sponsored by
 
 
QUIZ
When it comes to environmental awareness, are you plugged in or just idling? Take this test to see how green you really are.

 
INTERACTIVE
See how much your energy usage impacts the environment then compare your score to other Americans'.
 

 
 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Harmonix, creator of Rock Band and Guitar Hero, is changing videogames.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
CAMPAIGN 2008
republican gop convention periscope mccain

John McCain's choice to manage the GOP convention this summer is lobbyist Doug Goodyear, whose firm once represented Burma's repressive regime.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu