The Road Less Taken

DLC and Blue Democrats are Republicans, and Pelosi and Reid are their leaders. This 62 year old, life long Democrat is never voting for Hillary, Queen of the DLC.

Who really won the Vegas debate? In my opinion..No one..First of all, it appears that the debate was tainted. I thought Biden did well. It appears that Hilary's questions were planted along with 51% women staging a "boo" at the same time to make sure Obama and Edwards were not heard in an effort to throw them off guard anytime they said anything against her (how cheap). Also if Obama was asked why he favored drivers license for illegal aliens why wasn't Hilary Clinton questioned about her flip-flop on the issue. Whether right or wrong at least Obama's view on the subject is not a flip-flop. When Hilary said "no" on her previous "yes" she was not drilled on why? Hmmm interesting. Edwards and Obama were "booed" (staged response) while expressing their views. This should be "banned" from the debates. It's not fair to neither the Republican or Democratic candidate. It clearly shows that is prior intentional planned staging against the opponents you fear losing to the most! You could tell who that person posing as the commentator favored he skipped key subjects that would trip up Hilary Clinton. Feel sorry for the rest of the guys who appeared to have totally been shafted in the whole deal. Who won the debate? Certainly not Hilary Clinton!

Las Vegas debate: Fox News reported that a young lady came forward and said she was told to ask Hilary Clinton if she liked diamonds or pearls and was not given the opportunity to ask Hilary the question she came there to ask her. If this is true here again is the planting and staging in favor of Hilary Clinton. Hilary. We are watching trying to pick the best candidate. If this is happening for Hilary, this is not fair to either Democrats or Republicans. If Fox News aired this I know CNN knows about this. Why has CNN not reported this? The American people have the right to know who she is and if CNN is anyway in involved.

When British troops announced they were leaving Basra, insurgent attacks ceased. There's a simple solution to the continuing violence in Iraq now: announce we're leaving too. Markos is absolutely right.

What Markos is saying should not even need to be said let alone debated. Democratics won the 2006 election on one primary promise - to end the war - period, end of story. All the nonsense about the troops not having the right equipment is a highly convenient argument. Where were the republicans when, for the first 3 years of this illegal war our troops parents had to, in many cases, get them the equipment the army could not or chose not to provide. That argument does not have any basis in historical fact and the republicans do themselves and the troops a diservice even bringing it up.

Hey, Newsweek: You need a better discussion board. How many double- and triple-posts are acceptable before you figure out that this thing can't handle the traffic? And how about making it possible to read the posts from top to bottom -- you know, the way most Western readers read? Oh, and why, when I chose a FIVE-letter password for my new account, did your system send me an error that demanded I enter a password longer than FOUR characters? (Isn't FIVE longer than FOUR?) Come on, guys. If you don't want to look like the old media you are, you need to put up better stuff than this.

Now I will attempt to post my comment and see how many times it shows up.

Newsweek: You need a better discussion board. How many multiple posts will you tolerate before you figure out that this thing can't handle the traffic? And how about making it possible to read the posts from top to bottom -- you know, the way most Western readers read?

I have said before and will say again: There are no differences between Democrats and Republicans. I won $200 in bets that the Democrats would do nothing about this war. They stand as much to gain from it as do the Republicans. Even Michael Moore has Haliburton stock. Anyone who believes this war will eventually end without a violent revolution in this country is a fool.

There will be plenty of money to bring the troops home safely; just not enough to control the oil fields for Exxon and Shell. Let *them* pay private mercenaries to steal the oil instead of using our brave sons and daughters.

There will be plenty of money to bring the troops home safely; just not enough to control the oil fields for Exxon and Shell. Let *them* pay private mercenaries to steal the oil instead of using our brave sons and daughters.

There will be plenty of money to bring the troops home safely; just not enough to control the oil fields for Exxon and Shell. Let *them* pay private mercenaries to steal the oil instead of using our brave sons and daughters.

"Anti-war sentiment among the American people is now approaching 70 percent". Markos didn't say that 70% of Americans want an immediate pull-out. To claim he did is to spin his words to prove a flawed point. It's a shame that some people are inclined to do that.

"anti-war sentiment among the American people is now approaching 70 percent". Markos didn't say 70% want an immediate pull-out. To claim he did is to spin his words to prove a flawed point. It's a shame that many people tend to do that.

How about more links in the article? Lots of polls talked about, it would be useful to have the links for back up. This is on the internet, and it should be linked up to provide support for the facts in the article.

That's very inciteful armyaunt but if God needs to help save anyone it's America from the bungling ineptitude of GWB, his party and its blind-faith supporters like you.