A Learning Disability
Little is being done to give vets the educational opportunities their elders enjoyed.
Charles Schelberg might never have gone to college were it not for a rush of government generosity more than 60 years ago. Born into a family of fishermen on Maryland's Eastern Shore, Schelberg joined the Navy in World War II and spent two years aboard a destroyer escort in the Pacific. By the time he returned home in 1946, his father had died of pneumonia and the family financial situation, not good to begin with, had grown worse. Schelberg, now 82, says it was his luck that while he was at war Congress had passed legislation known as the GI Bill (officially the Servicemen's Readjustment Act). It paid full tuition for veterans at any public or private university along with housing, books and a $50 monthly stipend. "It was like pennies from heaven," he says. In three years, he got a bachelor's degree at Washington College in Chestertown, Md., and was earning more than his father ever had.
Until President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed the GI Bill into law, America had almost never treated its vets well. Just a decade earlier, Congress refused to approve bonus payouts to veterans of World War I made poor by the Great Depression. When 20,000 of them marched on Washington in the summer of 1932, President Herbert Hoover sent troops (led by Douglas MacArthur) to burn down their tent encampment. Roosevelt, in a 1943 fireside chat, harked back to that confrontation and vowed new vets wouldn't face the same hardships. "They must not be demobilized into an environment of inflation and unemployment, to a place on a bread line, or on a corner selling apples." The GI Bill he pushed through a year later, in addition to paying for college, provided vets with low-interest mortgage loans and help finding jobs.
Now Americans are once again coming home from war, and Schelberg's grandson is among them. Matthew Schelberg enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserves in 2001 and took part in the invasion of Iraq two years later. He spent six months south of Baghdad and returned for a second tour in Haditha that ended earlier this year. Like his grandfather, Schelberg went from an overseas deployment to a college classroom. But as he studies at Bucknell University, the debt piles up. Schelberg's GI Bill, a scaled-down version of the original, pays less than one tenth of his university and housing fees, which come to $46,000 a year. By graduation, he expects to have taken out $60,000 in student loans.
Is it time for a new GI Bill? Veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan face so many other difficulties, it's hard to imagine the government's making their college subsidy a priority. Huge numbers suffer from brain injuries and emotional trauma and aren't getting enough care. The Veterans Affairs administration, which handles health benefits and disability payments, is underbudgeted by the Bush administration and oversubscribed. Even some advocates of better vet care question if the government has the same moral obligation to volunteers in today's military as it did to draftees six decades ago. Yet the argument for a new contract with troops sheds light not only on the way it might resolve some veterans' woes but on some of the military's (recruitment, for example). And its promoters say it might re-infuse America with the sense of possibility that followed World War II. "President Bush keeps talking about these people as the next Greatest Generation," says Sen. Jim Webb, who fought in Vietnam and whose son recently returned from service in Iraq. "All I'm saying is, let's give them the same educational chance that the Greatest Generation had."
The impact of the GI Bill after World War II is difficult to overestimate. Eight million returnees from war got a college education or vocational training on the government's dime. Universities that were traditionally elitist and often discriminatory handed out twice as many degrees in 1950 as before the war. With their college diplomas and their homes in the suburbs, vets helped form the country's middle class and its new cadre of achievers. Fourteen of them went on to win Nobel Prizes and three became presidents (Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush).
Since then, the story is best illustrated by two crisscrossing lines on a graph: one marks the decline in GI benefits, the other the rising cost of college tuition. Congress voted on the current version of benefits, known as the Montgomery GI Bill, in 1985, when the military was on a peacetime footing. "It was designed as a recruitment incentive, a little bump," says Webb. "Not as a wartime benefit." Active-duty GIs contribute $1,200 to their fund in the first year of service and get a $9,900 subsidy for each of their four years at college (reservists like Schelberg get less). The amount is sufficient to cover in-state tuition at most public universities but leaves little for housing and other costs. It puts private universities beyond reach.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: vetfriend @ 03/13/2008 10:06:53 PM
Comment: It is the soldier not the poet not the preacher not the teacher not the reporter not the politician or the protestor that gives us our freedoms. We live in the greatest nation ever because of our military because of the sacrifices they where willing to make and far too many did make. They did it not for a sense of entitlement but because they truly loved their country and to not give them the ability to go to college without putting them into debt is a horrible thing. These men and women deserve so much more.
Posted By: vetfriend @ 03/13/2008 10:02:23 PM
Comment: I think it is absurd that the government will not make a sacrifice for the men and women who give us the very freedoms we possess. For it is the soldier not the poet who gives us freedom of speech, it is the soldier not the preacher who gives us the freedom of religion, it is the soldier not the journalist who gives us the freedom of press. It is the soldier not the protestor who gives us the freedom to demonstrate. Above all it is Americas military that keeps us as the greatest nation in the world and that has and is still providing us with the very freedom we take for granted.
Posted By: poetwarriorprince @ 03/13/2008 1:57:37 PM
Comment: You know mfenwick, you're not the only one that has this point of view. Very few people realize that it is not the words of the founding fathers that allows you to enjoy your level of freedom. It's only those who risk their blood that maintain the freedom for everyone. Not reporters nor lawyers and politians, but the military because the tree of freedom requires the blood patriots and tyrannts. When you become a slave you will realize that you cannot talk yourself free. You will not be able to buy your freedom with taxes. In a land where the currency is not based on precious metals or land. The value of the currency is directly to the number of people willing to shed blood in its defense.