Quantcast
 
 
 
Utah Highway Patrol Association
Roadside crosses commemorating fallen state troopers have stirred debate in Utah

Utah’s Cross Controversy

The Utah Highway Patrol Association is faced with a lawsuit over placing by the side of the road crosses honoring state troopers killed in the line of duty.

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

On a highway in southern Utah, midway between Tropic and Cedar City, a mammoth cross marks the place where, 29 years ago this month, state trooper Lynn Pierson was killed by a car thief. Pierson's son Clint, a 36-year-old county deputy, sees the stark white memorial every time he takes his kids to the local Wal-Mart. "It's a huge source of pride," he says. "As a family, it helped us heal."

There are 14 such crosses, all of them 12 feet tall, scattered around the state, each bearing the name of a dead trooper and the Utah Highway Patrol insignia. They were erected by the privately funded Utah Highway Patrol Association beginning in 1998, and whether they continue to stand is in the hands of a federal judge in Salt Lake City, who must decide if the crosses are symbols of remembrance or religion. U.S. District Judge David Sam heard arguments earlier this week on both sides of the constitutional debate and has promised to rule soon.

The controversy started in December 2005, when American Atheists Inc. filed suit to have the markers removed, arguing that the cross is a universal symbol of Christianity and, when placed on public property, illegal. The lawsuit sparked outrage from the families of fallen officers, other police officers and legislators. Even some atheists went out of their way to dissociate themselves from the Texas-based group.

The crosses honor troopers who have died since 1931. Ten of the monuments are on public land, which required special permission from the state. "It was never our intent to do anything religious," says Lt. Lee Perry, who helped spearhead the project. "It was strictly to honor their memory."

Assistant attorney general Thom Roberts made the same argument in court. The cross, like Christmas and "Closed on Sunday," is a religious expression that evolved into a secular symbol, he said. To emphasize his point, Roberts held up pictures of telephone poles and showed a clip from Ben Casey, the 1960s TV medical drama. In it, Dr. David Zorba uses the cross as a generic symbol for death.

Roberts also argued that, since 11 of the 14 honored troopers were Mormons, members of a church that does not use the cross as a symbol of its beliefs, the monuments could hardly be considered a religious expression. "This is not about putting God back in the public space," Roberts says. "This is a memorial to officers who died in the line of duty."

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: mchave35 @ 07/13/2008 7:13:35 PM

    Comment: This isn't about faith, this is about people that obviously have too much time on there hands, and even though they probobly hate it when anyone tries to preach to them, and make them beleive in something they do not beleive in , they are willing to do just that. Going to the point of legal action. This is a FREE country. If you do not want to see the crosses as a religeous article, then don't....and if you do, do. Incorporate self observance, and quit trying to decide for the general public. God, or not, no one has the right to tell anyone what to think, do, or feel. If you do not like it, don't pay attention, the World does not revole around you. Get a life!

  • Posted By: Joyfl @ 12/21/2007 6:35:35 PM

    Comment: My Son is a Police Officer and I applaud Utah for this act !!!

    Wake up people, if you used as much energy trying to protest our government's lack of help with the fuel situation, you'd actually be doing something........

  • Posted By: Augie BenDoggie @ 12/13/2007 8:58:29 AM

    Comment:
    When in fact, throughout all the history of the prophets of the Bible, ranging from Daniel, to Amos, to Ezekiel, to Isaiah, to all the others that came many years BEFORE the birth of Jesus...correctly predicted (or Foretold, if you like...) How the Son of God would be born, where he would be born, how he would live, what his ministry would be, and even, the how-when-where-what-and why of the final days of his life, leading to his execution.

    Many Many prophets, so remote from each other through time and space, all foretold the Who and What of Jesus....they called him Immanuel, i think...meaning "God with us"

    And if all those prophets, all those men, vastly remote and apart from each other, saw the same thing....and then many many many years later Jesus came to fulfill all those prophecies.....ALL OF THEM....then how are the Atheists going to prove to any of us that there is no God?

    Perhaps it is God they have to thank for their existence and ability to deny his.

    But before they can thank him, they have to acknowledge he exists, first.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Speedo's new and controversial high-tech LZR suit is helping swimmers smash dozens of records. How the company plans to capitalize on Olympic gold.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu