It didnt show it but my comment below is in response to Perla @ 11?17?2007 @ 11:27 pm.
It didnt show it but my comment below is in response to Perla @ 11?17?2007 @ 11:27 pm.
Tell me, when you drive down any road and see a white cross what do you think of?? -- ----Is it--man those lunatic christians are out on the loose again trying to make us believe and trying to force christianity on us, or do you think ---- Oh somebody must of died there or someone is being remembered there. and feel a little sense of sadness? Atheists please find something better to do with your time and effort!!!!!
I can understand wanting to memorialize those who die in the line of duty trying to preserve our way of life. Wouldn't a wreath made of twigs that could withstand the weather be a more fitting marker ? And does it really have to be 12' tall ? Or how about planting a tree with a large memorial plaque attached to it that would be visible to drivers ? Over the years, if many more deceased in the line of duty have to be memorialized , I for one would be very unhappy driving along a highway looking at a sea of 12' crosses !
If you would be soo unhappy having to have drive down a highway looking at a sea of crosses in the free USA, than you should move to a country--- where there are no police officers or highway patrolmen anywhere in the country should you be hijacked and attacked by the mongrals that run loose because there is no government there to protect you. Ask some of the people there if they would be so offended to have to drive in a country where they might have to see memorials of fallen men and women who sacrificed their lives in the line of duty to protect them if they were just trying to get home! Just ask them how unhappy they would be. Better yet move there and tell us how bad it is to live in the USA where we do things like honor people in a public way who deserve it!
Posted By: gigemaggs83 @ 11/18/2007 1:23:15 AM
Comment: If the State of Utah said, "If you want to commerate the death of someone on the side of the highway, the only acceptable symbol is a cross." This would, in my opinion, be a violation of the first amendment.
Give it up gigemaggs83. Your excuses to stick your stupid idiotic religion into everyone else's face is not going to work. The crosses will have to be removed and taxpayer money will be wasted in court trying to defend this immoral nonsense.
Based on the posts that I have read, if anyone is acting like a Thug, it's you. I think that my opinion is no more or less valuable than yours, and I have a right to express it.
gigemaggs83, a government putting on religious symbol on public property is most definitely respecting an establishment of religion, and you are a liar to deny it. It doesn't matter what you say. The Christian thugs always lose in court and they're going to lose in court again.
Uhh...I wish I could claim to have written the Constitution, including the first amendment, unfortunately that was a little before my time, so, I'm not sure what I lied about. It's pretty easy to actually read what the first amendment says. Why don't you read it and then tell us how the state ALLOWING a PRIVATE organization to put up a cross violates an amendment that restricts Congress from MAKING A LAW respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
If the State of Utah said, "If you want to commerate the death of someone on the side of the highway, the only acceptable symbol is a cross." This would, in my opinion, be a violation of the first amendment.
Posted By: hitesman143 @ 11/17/2007 8:01:48 PM Comment: "God needs to be put back in public places, When He was taken out of the schools, this country started going down hill. I am happy these crosses are put up and I pray that they are left where there at."
This proves the point I was making earlier. If Christian thugs get away with these 12 foot high crosses on public property, next they will demanding all school children must pray to the Christian God. It's obvious Christians are bullies who are constantly trying to force their religion, and their religion only, into our government and into our schools, every chance they get. This is why they must be fought in court every single time they try to break the law. These Christian thugs are traitors to our country and they must never be allowed to get away with anything.
American Athiests Inc. REALLY need to get over themselves. This has nothing to do with religion. Crosses by the roadside have become a universal symbol for remembering the people who have perished there. This is just about control. They want to control what other people do. Plain and simple.
Nope, no interest in controlling what you do at all so long as it does not, as Thomas Jefferson said "pick my pocket or break my leg." You can preach or teach or evangelize all you want. That is your right. If I do not like it I can walk away.
What is not permissible is for the government to be preaching or evangelizing or promoting a particular religion or even religion at all. When the government gets involved, my freedon to worship and pray and practice religion as I choose, whatever that may be, is damaged. So go ahead and practive religion as you see fit, but keep the government out of it completely and without exception.
JoeRandom said "While I am usually strongly opposed to the government making any show of religion or religious symbols, the article did say that it was a private organization that was paying for an erecting the markers, albeit on public land. This is a difficult choice. If the program specifically offered the families of the deceased troopers their choice of symbol, religious or secular, that would go along way towards solving this problem for me."
No, that doesn't work. There should be absolutely no compromise here. The First Amendment is sacred and there can be no violation of it. There must be no religious symbols on any government property and there can be no exceptions. Let the Christians get away with these 12 foot crosses, and they will try to get away with something else. Christians have no respect for our constitution so nobody should respect Christians. They must be kept under control or else this country will slowly become a theocracy. There must be absolutely no compromising with thugs, including Christian thugs who try to stick their religion into everyone's else face.
Look at jdave1430a's comments. He denies our wall of separation and that is typical of Christian thugs. These people who deny our First Amendment can't be compromised with. They must be kept under control. They are constantly trying to break the law, so patriotic Americans who respect our Bill of Rights must fight them in court every single time they try to get away with something.
There aren't that many policemen getting killed in the line of duty. A cross is a good idea. I believe the majority should rule on this issue. Which is for the cross.
If the majority rules, then there is no freedon to practice the religion of your choice in the way that you choose. Only when the practice of religion is left only with individual people, and not with any governement, can there be true freedom of religion.
It is interesting that this is happening in Utah. The Mormons were terribly persecuted for their beliefs and driven ever futher west until they eventually landed in Utah. I would think that Mormons would be particularly sensitive to any infringement on religiious freedom.
Where the idea of a strict, secular separation of Church and State came from is a mystery. God is all over the Founding Documents and in the Federalist Papers. The Founders called on God for all things having to do with this nation -- One Nation Under God --- ....endowed by their Creator .... and many other examples. We, as a nation, need to tell organizations such as the American Atheists and the communist leaning ACLU that we were never to be a nation without religion, and that this nation will not survive long without God in the government. From OF Religion, is not the same as Freedom FROM Religion.
No mystery at all. The Founding Fathers were quite aware of the detrimental effects a state religion had on the practice of religion in Europe. The mixing of religion and state corrupted both - not to mention the endless wars over religion.
By the way, the "One Nation Under God" was a fairly recent invention. It was only introduced into the Pledge OF Allegiance in the 1950s in response to the fear of the Communists.
Having religion mix with government is not a way to a successful government or a successful religion. Only a purely secular government can truly guarantee the freedom for everyone to practice the religion of their choice in the way that they choose.
The issue is not about atheists wanting to control other people. The issue is that if the government is using religious symbols, then it is violating the anti-establishment clause of the 1st Amendment. I do not want the government telling me what is the "correct" religion or the "correct" way to pray or the "correct" way to worship. Religion, its practice, and its expression must be left soley in the hands of individual people. For any government (federal, state. local) to use the symbols of a particular religion in any way violates everyone' right to freely practive the religion they choose for themselves.
While I am usually strongly opposed to the government making any show of religion or religious symbols, the article did say that it was a private organization that was paying for an erecting the markers, albeit on public land. This is a difficult choice. If the program specifically offered the familes of the deceased troopers their choice of symbol, religious or secular, that would go along way towards solving this problem for me. But still, I would have to ask, what difference does the trooper's religion make in the honoring of the trooper for his duty and sacrifice?
"But this is a little bit picky, even for them." No, it's not a little picky. There can be no violation of the First Amendment. No government in America can be endorsing any religion. Christians are out of control in this country. Every time they get away with something they try to do something else to violate our laws. The only solution is to not let them get away with anything. The crosses have to go and I'm sure they will go. Christians always lose in court because they are always wrong. It makes me mad taxpayer money is going to be wasted trying to defend these illegal crosses. If somebody wants to make a fool out of himself and put up a cross on his own property, he can do that. But public property is for everyone, and the government can't favor any religion. Anyone who says a cross has nothing to do with religion is a liar. The Christians who want these crosses are bullies who think they can do anything they want because they are the majority. This country doesn't work that way. The law must be obeyed by everyone. There's plenty of alternatives to a cross, which proves Christians are trying to get away with something here.
It is hard to understand why these atheists feel so offended when people express ideas other than theirs, yet they have no problems trying to force their ideas on all others.
God needs to be put back in public places, When He was taken out of the schools, this country started going down hill. I am happy these crosses are put up and I pray that they are left where there at.
You have luxury of standing on the shoulders of several hundred years of religious freedom to boldly state that religion should be put back in the public. Look at all the wars going on now, all the wars throughout history- without separation of church and state, religion oppressed and kills (among many other GOOD things it accomplishes.) When you see women in certain Muslim countries not allowed to work or receive an education or vote--do you then also boldly proclaim that religion should be brought back into the public in this country. Everyone has their beliefs. The only way to protect and honor people's religious beliefs is to separate church and state.
Don't blame God for the acts of men, even if they claimed they "were doing it in His name. As I and many others have said; "the constitution guarantees freedom of religion, not freedon FROM religion". Also to mix beliefs as you do does a great disservice to all religions. Yes, there are extreme Fundamentalist Muslim states that do repress women, but there are also secular or moderate Muslim states that do not. But don't blame religion and above all don't blame God. Yes, He needs to be put back, mabe then we'll get over our infatuation with ourselves, wealth, and control.
Why is everybody picking on the Christians now days? Is it in-vogue? These atheists who have brought suit against Utah based on their "beliefs" have presented their selves as a group, or in effect, a religion. Why should their "religious" views which dictate totally no religion be held over any other view. A ruling to remove the crosses would be an official government sanction of their "non-religion" -religion .
I agree, either you believe in a "higher power" or you don't. No matter which you choose it is still a belief. To say they don't believe in any god is still a belief and could be said to be a "religious" belief in reverse. Then to form a group or association of atheists would also be similar to forming a church. One reason to form a church is for mutual support same as it would be for an association, except that the extreme atheists have done so to gain political clout to satisfy their control issues. I have found extreme atheists to be deep seated control freaks, which is why they cannot tolerate a god to be "over them".
The cross has long been used as a memorial marker for places of death or a grave marker even if the deceased was a christian or not. Even the Nazi's used crosses to mark their graves in the battlefield, and christians wern't too far below the Jews on the Solution list. As a christian my self, I must ask why any religious symbol offends the extreme atheist? Don't give me the old "separation of church and state" grind, I believe there is more to it or they wouldn't make such a big deal of it. I ask those who are offended to examine them selves inside as to why. The constitution grants freedom of religion (or none at all), not freedom FROM religion. If it bothers you so much then the advice I have for you is the same advice I got from a member of the gay community; "if you don't like it then don't look at it". As a christian I don't agree with their lifestyle but I won't deliberately go out of my way to give them greif, it's their choice and I won't denigrate them for it. Besides, atheists should practice what they "preach"; they don't like God to tell them what to do, and I don't like the atheist to tell me what I can and cannot do!
The cross has long been used as a memorial marker for places of death or a grave marker even if the deceased was a christian or not. Even the Nazi's used crosses to mark their graves in the battlefield, and christians wern't too far below the Jews on the Solution list. As a christian my self, I must ask why any religious symbol offends the extreme atheist? Don't give me the old "separation of church and state" grind, I believe there is more to it or they wouldn't make such a big deal of it. I ask those who are offended to examine them selves inside as to why. The constitution grants freedom of religion (or none at all), not freedom FROM religion. If it bothers you so much then the advice I have for you is the same advice I got from a member of the gay community; "if you don't like it then don't look at it". As a christian I don't agree with their lifestyle but I won't deliberately go out of my way to give them greif, it's their choice and I won't denigrate them for it. Besides, atheists should practice what they "preach"; they don't like God to tell them what to do, and I don't like the atheist to tell me what I can and cannot do!
So what next? National cemeteries are also public property. Shall we pull all the crosses and Stars of David out of Arlington and every other place that honors people who died for the right for whackos like these people to have their say in this country? Shall we dishonor the faith of our "honored dead" by robbing them of the symbol that marks where they lie? ENOUGH ALREADY! the Founding Fathers were afraid of a Henry VIII-type state-mandated religion dictating to Americans how to believe, or Puritans knocking on people's doors to fine them for not going to church. They did not envision or sanction any attempt to stamp out every public display of religion in America. If this judge has any brains at all he will toss this frivolous suit for the ridiculous waste of time that it is.
Absolutely correct. Look up the American Battle Monuments Comission. We have fields all over the world filled with thousands of marble crosses and stars of David to mark honored dead. Political Correctness and such is the sickness of self importance and needs to be called down. As far as atheists, they do have a Symbol and it looks like an atom, reflecting science. The people doing the suing are sick and sad.
Good post. I couldn't agree with you more....
It is so eary for Christians, no matter what demonination, to say that using a cross to mark the location of a fallen trooper is fine. You are deluding yourself. This marker is clearly and precisly a religious statement no matter what you want to call it. For the state to allow this on state land is insulting to say the least. Again the so called "open minded" Christian community is being closed minded. If you want to mark these locations, put up a simple marker indicating who the trooper was and how the trooper died. Please keep your religius beliefs and symbols in your own house or church and stop trying to foist them on everyone else Your lack of compasion for others is an insult to the fallen troopers families.
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss