Utah Highway Patrol Association
Roadside crosses commemorating fallen state troopers have stirred debate in Utah

Utah’s Cross Controversy

The Utah Highway Patrol Association is faced with a lawsuit over placing by the side of the road crosses honoring state troopers killed in the line of duty.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

On a highway in southern Utah, midway between Tropic and Cedar City, a mammoth cross marks the place where, 29 years ago this month, state trooper Lynn Pierson was killed by a car thief. Pierson's son Clint, a 36-year-old county deputy, sees the stark white memorial every time he takes his kids to the local Wal-Mart. "It's a huge source of pride," he says. "As a family, it helped us heal."

My Take
Follow your favorite NEWSWEEK columnists

Customize the Newsweek homepage to feature the latest word from your favorite columnists.

There are 14 such crosses, all of them 12 feet tall, scattered around the state, each bearing the name of a dead trooper and the Utah Highway Patrol insignia. They were erected by the privately funded Utah Highway Patrol Association beginning in 1998, and whether they continue to stand is in the hands of a federal judge in Salt Lake City, who must decide if the crosses are symbols of remembrance or religion. U.S. District Judge David Sam heard arguments earlier this week on both sides of the constitutional debate and has promised to rule soon.

The controversy started in December 2005, when American Atheists Inc. filed suit to have the markers removed, arguing that the cross is a universal symbol of Christianity and, when placed on public property, illegal. The lawsuit sparked outrage from the families of fallen officers, other police officers and legislators. Even some atheists went out of their way to dissociate themselves from the Texas-based group.

The crosses honor troopers who have died since 1931. Ten of the monuments are on public land, which required special permission from the state. "It was never our intent to do anything religious," says Lt. Lee Perry, who helped spearhead the project. "It was strictly to honor their memory."

Assistant attorney general Thom Roberts made the same argument in court. The cross, like Christmas and "Closed on Sunday," is a religious expression that evolved into a secular symbol, he said. To emphasize his point, Roberts held up pictures of telephone poles and showed a clip from Ben Casey, the 1960s TV medical drama. In it, Dr. David Zorba uses the cross as a generic symbol for death.

Roberts also argued that, since 11 of the 14 honored troopers were Mormons, members of a church that does not use the cross as a symbol of its beliefs, the monuments could hardly be considered a religious expression. "This is not about putting God back in the public space," Roberts says. "This is a memorial to officers who died in the line of duty."

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: idli007 @ 04/08/2009 10:50:43 PM

    Hello there. Life is challenging nowadays. But there are solutions for every problem. There are various websites that helps drug addicts. These websites are really promising websites to cure drug addicts. One of them is Utah drug rehab center.
    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
    cristiano
    <a href="http://www.addictionlink.org/drug-rehab-center/utah">utah drug rehab</a>

  • Posted By: WJPostonNW @ 03/17/2009 9:52:11 AM

    Just to be clear, the State of Utah argued (and the trial court judge agreed) that the cross is not a Christian symbol? As I Christian, I take offense to this. We can debate about whether it is proper to put a Christian symbol on public land, but this was not the thrust of the argument in this case. The real concern that Christians (and people of other faiths as well) should have with this case is that a judge in Utah thinks he has the power to determine what is a religious symbol and what is not. Would this judge also call the Bible just another book to be placed on the fiction shelf at the local public library?

  • Posted By: mchave35 @ 07/13/2008 7:13:35 PM

    This isn't about faith, this is about people that obviously have too much time on there hands, and even though they probobly hate it when anyone tries to preach to them, and make them beleive in something they do not beleive in , they are willing to do just that. Going to the point of legal action. This is a FREE country. If you do not want to see the crosses as a religeous article, then don't....and if you do, do. Incorporate self observance, and quit trying to decide for the general public. God, or not, no one has the right to tell anyone what to think, do, or feel. If you do not like it, don't pay attention, the World does not revole around you. Get a life!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now