Utah’s Cross Controversy

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Brian Barnard, a Salt Lake City attorney who represents the atheists, counters that the case hinges not on what a Mormon thinks but on how a reasonable observer would interpret a giant cross on the side of the highway. And when people see a giant white cross, he says, they don't just think of death, they think of the death of Jesus Christ. "It's hard to conceive of another symbol that is so instantly meaningful," Barnard says. "And here's the state of Utah putting its stamp of approval on it."

Besides, he notes, just because the LDS Church does not use the Star of David doesn't change the fact that it is a religious symbol exclusive to one faith. At one point in Tuesday's hearing, an attorney for the UHPA underscored Barnard's point, noting that if a Jewish trooper were killed, his family would have the option of erecting a giant Star of David in place of a cross.

Robert Kirby, the former police officer who came up with the idea for the memorials, says the cross was intended to be an easily recognizable symbol of the sacred, not a religious statement. Kirby, now a columnist for the Salt Lake Tribune, says that he and Perry debated a lot of different symbols—signs, giant rocks, tombstones—before settling on the cross. "We wanted something instantly recognizable at 75 miles per hour, something that would say, 'This is hallowed ground'," says Kirby. "I have a lot of respect for the atheists. I believe in separation of church and state. But this is a little bit picky, even for them."

Update: U.S. District Judge David Sam ruled Tuesday, Nov. 20, against the atheists, holding that the crosses erected around the state of Utah to commemorate fallen state troopers can stand. Sam's decision held that the Roman cross is not a recognizable form of Christianity, at least in this context. "Just as the Christmas tree evolved into a secular symbol of celebration, the cross has evolved into a symbol capable of communicating a secular message of death and burial," Sam wrote. The Texas-based American Atheists Inc., which claimed the memorials violate the separation of church and state, promised to appeal.

© 2007

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: idli007 @ 04/08/2009 10:50:43 PM

    Hello there. Life is challenging nowadays. But there are solutions for every problem. There are various websites that helps drug addicts. These websites are really promising websites to cure drug addicts. One of them is Utah drug rehab center.
    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
    cristiano
    <a href="http://www.addictionlink.org/drug-rehab-center/utah">utah drug rehab</a>

  • Posted By: WJPostonNW @ 03/17/2009 9:52:11 AM

    Just to be clear, the State of Utah argued (and the trial court judge agreed) that the cross is not a Christian symbol? As I Christian, I take offense to this. We can debate about whether it is proper to put a Christian symbol on public land, but this was not the thrust of the argument in this case. The real concern that Christians (and people of other faiths as well) should have with this case is that a judge in Utah thinks he has the power to determine what is a religious symbol and what is not. Would this judge also call the Bible just another book to be placed on the fiction shelf at the local public library?

  • Posted By: mchave35 @ 07/13/2008 7:13:35 PM

    This isn't about faith, this is about people that obviously have too much time on there hands, and even though they probobly hate it when anyone tries to preach to them, and make them beleive in something they do not beleive in , they are willing to do just that. Going to the point of legal action. This is a FREE country. If you do not want to see the crosses as a religeous article, then don't....and if you do, do. Incorporate self observance, and quit trying to decide for the general public. God, or not, no one has the right to tell anyone what to think, do, or feel. If you do not like it, don't pay attention, the World does not revole around you. Get a life!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now