Snuffed Out

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

What has the federal government done recently to fight Big Tobacco?
Federally speaking, taking on the big tobacco companies has virtually come to a standstill under the Bush administration. For instance, almost every nation in the world has ratified an important World Health Organization (WHO) treaty, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. But not the United States. The Bush administration has never sent the treaty to the Senate. The Bush administration has strong ties to the tobacco industry. Karl Rove worked as a tobacco lobbyist before joining the White House, and so have other significant figures in the Bush administration. [Rove is now a contributor to NEWSWEEK.]

Any chance of a more assertive attitude when a new president takes office?
Many of the current candidates would probably send the WHO treaty to the Senate.

If we look 10 years ahead, what do you think the situation will be?
The battleground is becoming global. Now that people in more affluent and well-educated societies are quitting smoking, the tobacco industry is very aggressive about finding new markets. Today one in five Americans smoke, as opposed to almost half of all adults a few decades ago. But worldwide there are probably more smokers now than ever before in human history. The WHO estimates that in the 21st century, approximately 1 billion people will die worldwide of tobacco-related diseases. That's 10 times the number that died in the 20th century. The real issue for the future will be to ensure that worldwide smoking becomes less instead of more prevalent.

Last question: are you a smoker yourself?
[Laughs] No, I've never smoked.

© 2007

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: sexymama @ 09/15/2008 11:12:44 AM

    Wow, these smokers are really adament about fighting to keep their right to smoke. The fight is about truth in advertising. Obviously, if one is already addicted to cigarettes, they believe it is their right to smoke. The concentration should be on the untruthful marketing to young people. When you label something as light, you make a false implication that it is safer than regular cigarettes. Fewer carcinogens do not prevent you from getting cancer. Smoking any kind of cigarette is dangerous and it kills. Yes, we are all going to die, but what quality of life do you want to have? Do you want to have to walk around with an oxygen tank? Or have an artificial voice because of destroying your larynx? Or a hole in your neck because you can no longer breathe through your mouth?...........Wow. How many of these comments are posted by someone who has in investment in the tobacco industry I wonder?

  • Posted By: unclassifiedsubject @ 06/19/2008 10:25:24 AM

    "Smokers who use a reduced-tar product, such as light cigarettes, compensate by taking larger puffs, thus drawing more deeply into their lungs the smoke of those products. " Ok, this was on page one of the article.

    It states that the "light" cigarettes are reduced tar. There is something wrong with the compensation theory. If someone smokes like me, they only smoke 4-7 cigarettes a day, share half of them, and take 1 to 3 second drags like every other smoker I know. What's the point? I enjoy it like every other smoker.

    Some of us actually are "LIGHT" SMOKERS who want to smoke "LIGHT" cigarettes and aren't trying to "compensate" for anything. I ENJOY what little bit i smoke, I don't LIKE the flavor of the "full-flavor" cigarettes, and I am actually offended by the fact that someone WHO HAS NEVER SMOKED is trying to say that "light" cigarettes need to be banned because THEY think that they know the habit.

    By the way, researchers probably shouldn't try to give light cigarettes to "full-flavor" smokers. It's like giving somone who's used to a lot of sugar black coffee.... DUH, they are going to add sugar to it! As long as they can do it, they will "compensate" to make it what they are used to. Then look at every other habit. Although not as bad for you, a person who lightly uses cologne may eventually over-use it because they are used to it and can't smell it anymore. The bottomline is, smoker's aren't all stupid, and it isn't all the big companies. We know how this works, and we make it our choice. We like our choices. We uderstand them more often than you think.

  • Posted By: unclassifiedsubject @ 06/19/2008 10:25:01 AM

    "Smokers who use a reduced-tar product, such as light cigarettes, compensate by taking larger puffs, thus drawing more deeply into their lungs the smoke of those products. " Ok, this was on page one of the article.

    It states that the "light" cigarettes are reduced tar. There is something wrong with the compensation theory. If someone smokes like me, they only smoke 4-7 cigarettes a day, share half of them, and take 1 to 3 second drags like every other smoker I know. What's the point? I enjoy it like every other smoker.

    Some of us actually are "LIGHT" SMOKERS who want to smoke "LIGHT" cigarettes and aren't trying to "compensate" for anything. I ENJOY what little bit i smoke, I don't LIKE the flavor of the "full-flavor" cigarettes, and I am actually offended by the fact that someone WHO HAS NEVER SMOKED is trying to say that "light" cigarettes need to be banned because THEY think that they know the habit.

    By the way, researchers probably shouldn't try to give light cigarettes to "full-flavor" smokers. It's like giving somone who's used to a lot of sugar black coffee.... DUH, they are going to add sugar to it! As long as they can do it, they will "compensate" to make it what they are used to. Then look at every other habit. Although not as bad for you, a person who lightly uses cologne may eventually over-use it because they are used to it and can't smell it anymore. The bottomline is, smoker's aren't all stupid, and it isn't all the big companies. We know how this works, and we make it our choice. We like our choices. We uderstand them more often than you think.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse