Radioactive Politics

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

It took Singh nearly two years to disabuse them of their fears, which he eventually managed by addressing all their technical concerns through tough negotiations with the United States. Yet just when he succeeded this summer, the opportunistic Indian right and the Stalinist left dramatically raised the ante, with the communists threatening to bring down the government. Sensing weakness, many in Singh's own party began to maneuver to replace him as prime minister.

Singh was forced to choose between his job and the deal with Bush. The political jockeying in New Delhi frustrated India's supporters in Washington and left them wondering whether India was truly ready for the big time.

The most remarkable thing about this story is not that India suffered self-doubt before grabbing a deal that is so patently in its favor. The real shocker is that Singh, widely seen as one of India's weakest prime ministers, came so close to succeeding in radically reorienting India's world view.

In a country where it has been a political taboo for decades to talk about good relations with the United States, Singh has put the prospect of a strategic partnership at the top of the national agenda.

And he now seems set to prevail. After stepping back to reposition himself, Singh now seems to have stared down the left and won some space to revive the agreement. After Singh implied he might intervene in the communists' West Bengal power base (where communist cadres had attacked peaceful protesters), the left has agreed to let Singh begin talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency--the next step toward implementing the deal.  

        With the Congress Party now rallying behind him, Singh has reversed his fortunes and might well go down in India's history as the man who revolutionized both its economic and foreign policies. In the early 1990s, he initiated a root-and-branch overhaul of India's moribund economy. He is now within striking distance of transforming India's relationship with the United States and the West as well.

Mohan is a professor of South Asian studies at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University and a columnist for The Indian Express.

© 2007

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: razer @ 11/28/2007 1:17:08 PM

    Comment: THIS DEAL IS TOTALLY AGAINST THE INDIAN INTEREST.FOR EXAMPLE IN CASE OF FUTURE NUCLEAR BOMB TESTING THE AMERICAN HYDE ACT AND ITS OWN LAW WILL PREVAIL OVER INDIAN LAWS.NOT EVEN THAT IF SOME COURAGEOUS PRIME MINISTER TESTED HE HAS TO KEEP IN MIND THAT AMERICA WILL TAKE AWAY ITS NUCLEAR REACTOR AND ITS TECHNOLOGY

  • Posted By: sunilnd2 @ 11/28/2007 4:33:38 AM

    Comment: The deal offered by America is in India's interest but due to a long period of mistrust in Indians who feel that America favored Pakistan and this change in attitude is just result of 9-11. Other reason of its being still debated instead of execution is compulsion of coalition politics. Marxists are opposing it as they feel that this deal will weaken China. However, in long term this is good as majority of Young Indians are in favor of deal and better relations with USA and there is increasing awareness of malafide intention of Communists. At this stage America should also understand the problem s that Manmohan Singh is facing and should extend the deadline for implementing the deal.
    (Sunil Kumar)
    sunilnd2@india.com

Sponsored by
 
 
World Affairs

With the nuclear pact and a booming economy, India seems set to vault into the future—unless the Stalinist left succeeds in dragging it down.

 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
NATIONAL SECURITY
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu