TELEVISION

The Meritocracy of Desire

'Dancing With the Stars' is less about footwork and more about who most wants to win.

Dancing With Helio

11/28/08: A clip from Helio Castoneves' winning performance on ABC's 'Dancing With The Stars'

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Pop quiz, hotshot. You have to write about the finale of "Dancing With the Stars," a show of which you have seen maybe 20 minutes between all five of its seasons. What do you do? This was the question as I watched the bloated, two-night "Dancing" finale, one of the less pleasant television experiences I've had lately. I finally decided I'd approach the piece as a journey of personal reflection in which I'd answer the question, "What do people like about this show, and why can't I bear to watch it?"

It's certainly not because I have refined taste. If tasked with defending television as a medium, I'd probably trot out "America's Next Top Model" as my first exhibit. I've watched the Magic Bullet infomercial so many times I could perform it as a one-man off-Broadway show. I'm hardly an elitist. So when I see a show like "Dancing With the Stars," which seems to thrill everyone but me, I don't feel superior, I just feel left out. But try as I might, I just can't seem to invest in the show.

Watching Monday night's final dance-off, the reasons for my distaste became clear. First is the "Dancing With the Stars" band. Instead of the original recordings to which they've rehearsed, the couples must dance accompanied by a band that, in top form, sounds like the best wedding band you could book on six hours' notice, and at worst like your great-aunt Rose crashed your karaoke party. I'm also not fond of the judges, Len Goodman, Carrie Ann Inaba and Bruno Tonioli, whose critiques carry an air of snobbery that make them seem needlessly technical, professional as they may be.

Those are quibbles. The real issue with "Dancing" is the absence of real stakes. A show such as "Survivor" has regular people competing for a handsome prize ($1 million). "Flavor of Love" has regular people competing for a not-at-all handsome prize (Flavor Flav). But in either case, when the contestants are actual people, we can take at face value that they don't just want what they're competing for, they need it. It's a financial windfall, a big break, a shot at love, things everyone wants. The prize on "Dancing"? A chintzy mirrorball trophy that would make a great addition to any shed, and bragging rights, insomuch as winning a ballroom-dancing competition confers them. I don't want those prizes, so what reason do celebrities have for wanting them?

The answer, obviously, is none, so the show completely lacks suspense. But host Tom Bergeron tries to inject some anyway. On Monday's show, in describing the night's third and final "freestyle" dance, Bergeron spoke about how this round would be exciting because the dancers would be allowed to use "controversial maneuvers." Imagine my disappointment when not one of the couples paused midway through its routine to perform embryonic stem cell research.

I will admit though, as curmudgeonly as I remained throughout Monday's show, I did get one moment of unguarded delight. After performing his freestyle dance, race-car driver Helio Castroneves received thunderous applause. He jumped for joy, overcome with pride at his accomplishment. "I did it! I did it!" he said to Bergeron. "I know you did!" Bergeron replied, in that "You're making a scene" tone of voice. The judges were less convinced that Castroneves had done anything. They savaged his performance. The term "flat-footed" was tossed around. But in that moment he so didn't care. He was proud of himself.

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: lockwhip @ 11/29/2007 4:51:16 PM

    Comment: I was not the real fan in the house. My wife was the faithful one. My interest was fleeting most of the time, rather reading a good book or playing some cards on-line with some friends. But drop by I would to spend a couple of minutes reviewing some of the highlights with my wife. We have danced, competed in swing contests and enjoyed all kinds of dance. Mr. Alston's comments were sad in that they were ignorant of the depth of interest by the viewers, the level of disire by the contestants and the extremely hard work that the contestants put in to dance to the levels that even the lower placements had to put in. Sad for Mr. Alston and sad for some editor that allowed such a silly article to be printed.

  • Posted By: lockwhip @ 11/29/2007 4:43:09 PM

    Comment: My wife was the faithful watcher of the show as I stopped for moments on my way to the computer or to clean the kitchen after a messy meal that I had made. But even I think that Mr. Alston's comments after having a predisposition to disliking the format were both ignorant of the level of work that the contestants put in and the contestants desire to win (the silly trophy). Sad article and a sad editor that allowed it.

  • Posted By: SherriRBGR @ 11/29/2007 3:39:10 PM

    Comment: I love the show "So You Think You Can Dance," and have enve attended their dance tours. A friend has repeatedly said, "I can't believe you're not watching Dancing with the Stars!" So, this season, I decided to watch, albeit via TiVo, so I could whiz through the endless yak-yak-yak-yak. So I watched, along with my husband who lives vicariously through watching someone else dance (he's 6'7" and has 2 left feet). It was mildly interesting, but I watched the professionals more than I watched the Stars. If it had been a real competition, like Mr. Alston said, Mel B. or Sabrina would have won.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
NATIONAL SECURITY
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu