I was not the real fan in the house. My wife was the faithful one. My interest was fleeting most of the time, rather reading a good book or playing some cards on-line with some friends. But drop by I would to spend a couple of minutes reviewing some of the highlights with my wife. We have danced, competed in swing contests and enjoyed all kinds of dance. Mr. Alston's comments were sad in that they were ignorant of the depth of interest by the viewers, the level of disire by the contestants and the extremely hard work that the contestants put in to dance to the levels that even the lower placements had to put in. Sad for Mr. Alston and sad for some editor that allowed such a silly article to be printed.
- 1
- 2
The Meritocracy of Desire
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
I realized then that the real prize was the sense of accomplishment, and the appeal for the viewer is knowing that as soon as they're finished watching Marie Osmond dance around dressed as a surrealist rag doll, maybe they could accomplish something too. And when Castroneves won that chintzy mirrorball trophy, beating out the far more deserving Spice Girl Melanie Brown, it provided even more flakes for our snow globes. Not only did Castroneves win, he beat a woman with extensive dance experience, using nothing more than his will and unbridled enthusiasm.
The world of "Dancing With the Stars" is some kind of perverse meritocracy in which people are rewarded not for being the best at doing something but for being the best at wanting to do something. I understand why people might want to visit that world for an hour a week. Not that I plan on doing it again.
© 2007
- 1
- 2










Discuss