The Huckabee Factor

Comment: To ALL REPUBLICANS: Who from the Republican party would you support for President and why? I mean any Republican that you think can confront the issues we face day? What evidence do you have that they can handle the job?
Comment: With all the people without health care and the Iraq War can you really say this country is better off 8 years later? Did you loose a son or daughter in Iraq.?This election is no joke. It is no time to dress like a women and change wives. We need someone who keeps their word and respects America. Remember the next President is representing all of us not just some. Gulliani is good for New York for New Yorkers. Look at Hillary she is from Illinios but proved she can make it in Arkansas and in New York. Gulliani is still unproven, he is local not national. Huckabee represents a faction of the Rebpublican party that feels alienated by the candidates; they do not feel like Romney and Gulliani are even remotely conservative; if you look at their records and comments over the years you will find they are not convservatives they just want to win the Rebpublican nomination. Someone from the department of Homeland Securtiy should run for the Republican nomination someone who can prove they can unite organizations for the common good. If Gulliani had worked for the Department of Homeland securtiy and demonstrated that he could manage the delicate relationship with the CIA, FBi and local organizations to combat terrorism I might take a second look he is just unproven. He was not in control of 9/11 the terrorist were. He didn't even see it coming. He laughed at the fact that terrorist would hit the trade centers with planes. Gulliani has not proven himself nationally. He is trying to skip a step.

With all the people without health care and the Iraq War can you really say this country is better off 8 years later? Did you loose a son or daughter in Iraq.?This election is no joke. It is no time to dress like a women and change wives. We need someone who keeps their word and respects America. Remember the next President is representing all of us not just some. Gulliani is good for New York for New Yorkers. Look at Hillary she is from Illinios but proved she can make it in Arkansas and in New York. Gulliani is still unproven, he is local not national. Huckabee represents a faction of the Rebpublican party that feels alienated by the candidates; they do not feel like Romney and Gulliani are even remotely conservative; if you look at their records and comments over the years you will find they are not convservatives they just want to win the Rebpublican nomination. Someone from the department of Homeland Securtiy should run for the Republican nomination someone who can prove they can unite organizations for the common good. If Gulliani had worked for the Department of Homeland securtiy and demonstrated that he could manage the delicate relationship with the CIA, FBi and local organizations to combat terrorism I might take a second look he is just unproven. He was not in control of 9/11 the terrorist were. He didn't even see it coming. He laughed at the fact that terrorist would hit the trade centers with planes. Gulliani has not proven himself nationally. He is trying to skip a step.

Guilliani has a very rigid mind and power hungry mentality. He laughed at the thought of terrorist flying planes into the trade center; he never saw it coming. We need a President that can anticipate threats and derail them before they become a reality. A big part of that is managing relations in the middle east, eastere europe, China and Africa. Africa really needs attention. If their problems are not dealt with the world will pay a high price. Can Guilliani make head way in Africa, I don't think so. In eastern Europe I don't think so. In the middleast? You have got to be kidding me. I think he would make a good domestic President. To his credit he was a good mayor, but the means he took to achieve his goals were ruthless. I think Guiliani has a rigid mind and does not care if people have to suffer. His approach in New York was not tough, it was cruel. I think Guilaini should manage the treasury department. Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama are the only two candidates that won't forget about you and I and what is best for you and I. As mentioned Guilliani has a rigid mind and will only serve the intersest of his personal networks; Orthodox Jews are great financial supporters of Guiliani, I just cannnot envision Guilliani bringing peace to the Middle East and improving the lives of all not just those who are "worhty".

Guilliani has a very rigid mind and power hungry mentality. He laughed at the thought of terrorist flying planes into the trade center; he never saw it coming. We need a President that can anticipate threats and derail them before they become a reality. A big part of that is managing relations in the middle east, eastere europe, China and Africa. Africa really needs attention. If their problems are not dealt with the world will pay a high price. Can Guilliani make head way in Africa, I don't think so. In eastern Europe I don't think so. In the middleast? You have got to be kidding me. I think he would make a good domestic President. To his credit he was a good mayor, but the means he took to achieve his goals were ruthless. I think Guiliani has a rigid mind and does not care if people have to suffer. His approach in New York was not tough, it was cruel. I think Guilaini should manage the treasury department. Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama are the only two candidates that won't forget about you and I and what is best for you and I. As mentioned Guilliani has a rigid mind and will only serve the intersest of his personal networks; Orthodox Jews are great financial supporters of Guiliani, I just cannnot envision Guilliani bringing peace to the Middle East and improving the lives of all not just those who are "worhty".

Huckabee unlike the other candidates is a conservative , so it should be no surprise that he is leading in the Iowa polls. People know what he stands for. There is a serious threat in our world today, dirty bombs. Three men were arrested for allegedly trying to sell weapons-grade uranium, which apparently came from the former USSR. It is very easy now a days to get enough uranium to make a dirty bomb.There are many avenues a terrorist organization can pursue to obtain these materials. It could be through mafia organizations in Eastern Europe who have connections with Russian organized crime or government officials in Asia, Europe and the Middle East who all share common interests with these terrorist organizations. Which candidate can destabilize these threats and how will they secure the Russian nuclear, chemical and biological arsernal?? Which candidate can best manage the American relationship with China, Russia and the Middle East?? Having a bad realationship with these countries will make it impossible to successfully nolify this threat. Do any of these candidates have the skill, courage and unwavering determination to confront this issue.

I didn't say I would vote for him but compared to the current occupant of the White House, I found his intellectual curosity to be refreshing. If this guy gets the nomination we democrats will have to work very hard to beat him. I think his genuine which is more than I can say for the rest of the republican field.

We keep hearing Mike is "likeable." Why? Because he is comfortable in his own skin. He knows exactly what he believes and doesn't mind telling us all about it, because he's not inventing positions on the spot. And he is not threatened by those who disagree with him. He knows his opponents are just as valuable in the eyes of God as he is. I'd love the privilege of voting for him in November '08.

Religion, whether it's Christianity or any other is a framework by which one governs his or her personal life, ethics, morals and character. Any religion can give a person the right ethics, morals and character, and Christianity does not have an exclusive on this. Any time someone uses their religion as a factor by which they should be judged, warning lights should start flashing. Christianity teaches honesty, fair treatment of fellow humans and care for the poor and underprivileged. Such matters must be demonstrated by deeds, not by labels or membership in some society. The deeds of our current president and even many of our founding fathers -- many of whom were slave owners and adulterers -- bear out that the label of "Christian" was out of synch with their deeds. Discussion of religion in the context of the presidency is completely out of context, just as it is in business. Anytime someone makes a point of telling me they're a "good Christian /Jew/Mormon/whatever" in a business context has always been an indicator that I'm about to get screwed. Dubya is no exception and I would be extremely wary of any other candidate who rubs the "I'm a good Christian" line in my face.

I've liked Huckabee and his policies ever since I saw him get the Colbert bump. If ever a darkhorse candidate were to emerge as President of the US, this would be the election. I'm not so sure we'll see Romney, Giuliani, Clinton, or Obama in offce come 2008. Good Luck, Huck!

I've liked Huckabee and his policies ever since I saw him get the Colbert bump. If ever a darkhorse candidate were to emerge as President of the US, this would be the election. I'm not so sure we'll see Romney, Giuliani, Clinton or Obama in office come 2008. Good Luck, Huck!

Popularity? Why do our canidates spend more $$$$ than what they supposivly earn on their campaine if it were not about getting votes. Who really knows these people enough to say, He or She is my favorite. We all must search out and find our favorite and vote. As my reseach has shown, Huckabee has done a wonderful job in Arkansas, even though he was the !st Rep. Govenor there in forever. Character is an issue!! We don't need some smooth talking "salesman" to tell us the bull they think we need to hear. Lets put someone in whoses charator hes been tested and has done well in it. No matter who we vote in, it will be the toughest 4 years of their life. I would rather put my vote with someone who does not say one thing and only to continually do another.