CENTRAL ASIA

No Man's Land

Where the imperialists' Great Game once unfolded, tribal allegiances have made for a "soft border" between Afghanistan and Pakistan--and a safe haven for smugglers, militants and terrorists.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Introduction
Afghanistan shares borders with six countries, but the approximate 1500-mile-long Durand Line along Pakistan remains the most dangerous. Kabul has never recognized the line as an international border, instead claiming the Pashtun territories in Pakistan that comprise the Federally Administered Tribal Lands (FATA) and parts of North West Frontier Province along the border. Incidents of violence have increased on both sides of the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in the last year. Various reports in late 2007 showed militants gaining ground inside Pakistan and their influence has now spread to areas beyond the FATA. Similarly, in Afghanistan, violence has peaked since the ouster of the Taliban six years ago with a worrisome increase in suicide attacks.

My Take
Follow your favorite NEWSWEEK columnists

Customize the Newsweek homepage to feature the latest word from your favorite columnists.

Historical Conflict
The region that is today known as Afghanistan was long torn by ethnic and tribal rivalries. It started evolving as a modern state in the early nineteenth century when the British East India Company began expanding in the northwest of British-held India. This was also the time of the "great game"-the geopolitical struggle between the British and the Russian empires. The British held the Indian subcontinent while the Russians held the Central Asian lands to the north. Their spheres of influence overlapped in Afghanistan. Britain, concerned about Russian expansion, invaded Afghanistan in 1839 and fought the First Anglo-Afghan War. This led to a decade of machinations between the British and the Russians and two more bloody wars, at the end of which in 1919, Afghanistan won its independence.

Durand Line
The Durand Line is named after British Foreign Secretary Sir Henry Mortimer Durand, who demarcated the frontier between British India and Afghanistan in 1893. The line was drawn after negotiations between the British government and Afghan King Abdur Rahman Khan, founder of modern Afghanistan. This line brought the tribal lands (now a part of Pakistan) under British control. Barnett R. Rubin, director of studies at New York University's Center on International Cooperation, writes in Foreign Affairs that the British established a three-tiered border to separate their empire from Russia. The first frontier separated the areas of the Indian subcontinent under direct British administration from those areas under Pashtun control (today this line divides those areas administered by the Pakistani state from the FATA). The second frontier, the Durand Line, divided the Pashtun tribal areas from the territories under Afghanistan's administration. This now forms the international border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. The outer frontier, Afghanistan's border with Russia, Iran, and China, demarcated the British sphere of influence.

The Pakistan side of the Durand Line border includes the provinces of Balochistan, the North West Frontier Province (NWFP), and the seven tribal agencies of the FATA. On the Afghan side, the frontier stretches from Nuristan province in the northeast to Nimruz in the southwest. The British devised a special legal structure called the Frontier Crimes Regulations (FCR) to rule the tribal lands and this continues to be the legal regime in the FATA today.  

Tribal Connections
The ongoing border frictions are due in large part to tribal allegiances that have never recognized the century-old frontier. Forty percent of Afghanistan's population is made up of Pashtuns; in Pakistan, Pashtuns represent 15 percent to 20 percent of the country's population. Ethnic Balochis also live on both sides of the Afghan-Pakistani border as well as in neighboring Iran. "People on both sides of the Durand line consider it a soft border," says Husain Haqqani, director of Boston University's Center for International Relations. He adds: "Pashtuns consider it their own land even though there is also a loyalty to the respective states along with a desire to freely move back and forth."

Frederick Grare of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace writes that the Pashtun question is "an ethnic, political and geopolitical problem." At the time of India's partition, Pashtuns were only given the choice of either becoming a part of India or Pakistan. Many Pashtun nationalists on both sides of the Durand Line continue to demand an independent state of Pashtunistan. In Balochistan too, several organizations demand an independent state.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: noreengul @ 10/28/2008 4:38:58 AM

    I agree and support mehmood shah, we were once united under afghan rule but after british division the are-a culturally also divided,over years we puktoons living in pakistan have evolved different va-lues and culture,sorry to disappoint you but I wu-d not like to be called afghan or identified with them (although I am a proud pukhtoon of tribal areas in pakistan. I have my own identity and love to call myself cultured progressive puktoon victim of international politics and living in terror due to afghans talibans.

  • Posted By: Ali khan @ 01/29/2008 7:19:24 AM

    Mr mahmoodshah don't try to twist the facts. Be a man and call a spade a spade. Durand line is an imaginary line and was never and will never be accepted by pakhtoons on either side of Durand line.
    British divided us and we have suffered for a long time but now inshallah very soon we will be united again and will get rid of Pakistani army who are killing our men and women, elderly and children in the name of war against terrorism. They can fool the world and take west for a ride in the name of terror but not us and the truth is that Pakistan itself is a terrorist state. We pakhtoons will struggle for our freedom from Pakistani occupation and inshahllah we will get it.

  • Posted By: mahmoodshah @ 12/07/2007 3:03:58 AM

    I think the article in your esteemed paper certian basic in accuracies: the first being the impression that the International Border between Pakistan and Afghanistan is a disputed border.This is grossly incorrect because Afghanistan has never raised this issue at any International Forum and can not do so under International Law.The second inaccuracy pertains to the Pukhtun population in Afghanistan.Although there never have been any accurate cencus in Afghanistan but it is well known that the Pukhtun population is wellover 64%.And by the way may I add that the Pukhtuns living in Pakistan including the Tribal Area would like to called Pukhtuns than Afghans because Afghan is a geographical term used for all those who live in Afghanistan including Persian/Dari speaking people.Regards mahmoodshah Peshawar Pakistan.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now