SPONSORED BY:

No Man's Land

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Neighbor's Interference
A report by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) coauthored by Rubin and Abubakar Siddique points out: "The long history of each state offering sanctuary to the other's opponents has built bitterness and mistrust between the two neighbors." Afghanistan sheltered Baloch nationalists in the 1970s while Pakistan extended refuge and training to the mujahadeen in the 1980s and then later supported the Afghani Taliban. Following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, Pakistan's then military ruler Zia ul-Haq promoted the jihad in Afghanistan, funded thousands of Islamic madrassas, armed domestic Islamist organizations, and in the process "militarized and radicalized the border region," says the USIP report.

Experts say that underlying Pakistani actions in the region is concern about bolstering security against India. The USIP report notes Pakistan sought to support a "client regime in Afghanistan" that would be hostile to India, "giving the Pakistani military a secure border and strategic depth." By supporting Islamist militias among the Pashtun, Pakistan's government has tried to neutralize Baloch and Pashtun nationalism within its borders. The International Crisis group in October 2007 reported that Pakistan still supports Pashtun Islamist parties in a bid to counter Baloch and Pashtun forces. "Using Balochistan as a base of operation and sanctuary" and recruiting from its extensive madrassa network, the report says, the "Taliban and its Pakistani allies are undermining the state-building effort in Afghanistan." Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf has repeatedly denied this.

Porous Borders
Both the Pashtuns and Balochis gain much of their income from cross-border smuggling, says the USIP paper. Thanks to the largely porous border and people from similar ethnic groups straddling both its sides, "the borderlands already have become a land bridge for the criminal (drugs) and criminalized (transit trade) economies of the region." The transborder political and military networks between the two countries are reinforced as well as funded and armed by criminal activities such as trafficking in drugs, arms, and even people.

Afghanistan is the world's largest cultivator and supplier of opium (93 percent of the global opiates market). According to the Afghanistan Opium Survey 2007 by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, opium cultivation in the country is no longer associated with poverty. In fact, quite the opposite. The report says opium is now closely linked to the insurgency and the Taliban are again using it to get "resources for arms, logistics and militia pay," despite a foreign military presence.

The War on Terror
Since 9/11, "there is a large asymmetry of interests between Afghanistan and Pakistan," according to Carnegie's Grare. For Islamabad, Afghanistan is only one element in a larger game involving its policy toward India as well as its global standing, writes Grare. The relationship is mainly a bilateral issue for Afghanistan.

After 9/11, Pakistan allied itself with the United States in its war on terror. This created a dilemma for Pakistan, as it now had to hunt down the Taliban and the Islamic militant organizations it reportedly helped create in the first place. It also had to send its troops into the tribal lands where the Pakistani military has never been welcome. Incidents of Pakistani soldiers surrendering without a fight to militant organizations became common during 2007.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Solving the Palin Puzzle
Solving the Palin Puzzle

See how well you can see Sarah from your house, by taking our trivia quiz.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Dial 'A' for Accessory
Dial 'A' for Accessory

This season's top i-Phone add-ons.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: noreengul @ 10/28/2008 4:38:58 AM

    I agree and support mehmood shah, we were once united under afghan rule but after british division the are-a culturally also divided,over years we puktoons living in pakistan have evolved different va-lues and culture,sorry to disappoint you but I wu-d not like to be called afghan or identified with them (although I am a proud pukhtoon of tribal areas in pakistan. I have my own identity and love to call myself cultured progressive puktoon victim of international politics and living in terror due to afghans talibans.

  • Posted By: Ali khan @ 01/29/2008 7:19:24 AM

    Mr mahmoodshah don't try to twist the facts. Be a man and call a spade a spade. Durand line is an imaginary line and was never and will never be accepted by pakhtoons on either side of Durand line.
    British divided us and we have suffered for a long time but now inshallah very soon we will be united again and will get rid of Pakistani army who are killing our men and women, elderly and children in the name of war against terrorism. They can fool the world and take west for a ride in the name of terror but not us and the truth is that Pakistan itself is a terrorist state. We pakhtoons will struggle for our freedom from Pakistani occupation and inshahllah we will get it.

  • Posted By: mahmoodshah @ 12/07/2007 3:03:58 AM

    I think the article in your esteemed paper certian basic in accuracies: the first being the impression that the International Border between Pakistan and Afghanistan is a disputed border.This is grossly incorrect because Afghanistan has never raised this issue at any International Forum and can not do so under International Law.The second inaccuracy pertains to the Pukhtun population in Afghanistan.Although there never have been any accurate cencus in Afghanistan but it is well known that the Pukhtun population is wellover 64%.And by the way may I add that the Pukhtuns living in Pakistan including the Tribal Area would like to called Pukhtuns than Afghans because Afghan is a geographical term used for all those who live in Afghanistan including Persian/Dari speaking people.Regards mahmoodshah Peshawar Pakistan.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now