SECURITY

An Old Face Resurfaces

The Bush administration has offered the former World Bank president a new public service position.

 
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Don't ever say the Bush administration doesn't take care of its own. Nearly three years after Paul Wolfowitz resigned as deputy Defense secretary and six months after his stormy departure as president of the World Bank—amid allegations that he improperly awarded a raise to his girlfriend—he's in line to return to public service. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has offered Wolfowitz, a prime architect of the Iraq War, a position as chairman of the International Security Advisory Board, a prestigious State Department panel, according to two department sources who declined to be identified discussing personnel matters. The 18-member panel, which has access to highly classified intelligence, advises Rice on disarmament, nuclear proliferation, WMD issues and other matters. "We think he is well suited and will do an excellent job," said one senior official.

Wolfowitz, now a visiting scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, will replace former senator Fred Thompson, who quit over the summer to run for president. Although officials declined to say how Rice came to choose him, Wolfowitz began his government career in the 1970s in the State Department as an arms-control expert; he forged a relationship with Rice during the 2000 presidential campaign, when they both served as top foreign-policy advisers to the then candidate Bush. But his selection has raised more than a few eyebrows within State because he'll be providing advice on some of the same issues that critics say the administration got spectacularly wrong when Wolfowitz was pushing the case for the Iraq War at the Pentagon. (One of the department sources called the appointment "amazing.") At least Wolfowitz, who did not return calls seeking comment, will have like-minded company: other panel members include Robert Joseph, the former National Security Council official in charge of Iraq WMD intelligence, and ex-CIA director James Woolsey, both strong allies during the Iraq debate.

The sources said Wolfowitz has already accepted Rice's offer to fill the part-time position, though it won't be announced until the completion of a standard check for conflicts of interest. But he won't have to worry about any complaints from pesky Democrats. The position doesn't require Senate confirmation.

© 2007

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: shekel_trader @ 07/13/2008 12:54:36 AM

    We need to understand that Wolfowitz, like Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Elliot Abrams, Scooter Libby, and a plethora of other Israeli agents posing as American citizens, are working for Israel's interests as a first priority - not America's interests.

    My question is "what does George Bush owe these people that he would be so willing to ruin his reputation and his career by placing these people in key positions in government?" Perhaps we should ask a similar question to Congress who so blindly rubber stamp any bill designed for Israel's benefit.

    Wolfowitz is just one in a long line of misappointments of pro-Israel administrators who get put in position to mind the American store enabling the hard earned profits to slip out the back door to Israel. American citizenry needs to wake up and demand to their congressmen that this has to stop.

  • Posted By: ROBinDALLAS @ 03/31/2008 11:21:05 PM

    Wolfowitz has failed miserably in his last 2 jobs. At the State Department he was one of the architects and cheerleaders pushing the invasion of Iraq. FAILURE! He then gets booted from the World Bank for taking care of the salary and promotion of his girlfriend. FAILURE! How do they get away with having Condi Rice give him the chairmanship of the International Security Advisory Board? He gets right into the thick of it again, even though he has been a miserable FAILURE at his last two insider jobs. What the F---? I suspect it is only because he knows too much.

  • Posted By: jdcolv_pol @ 03/12/2008 10:11:18 PM

    While I agree that conviction of Bush and Cheney would be virtually impossible if the House impeached either of them, I have come to the conclusion that they should be impeached irrespemctive of the havoc it would cause. Impeachment would send a signal to the rest of the world that a very significant portion of the United States does not countenance the evil that they do; and if Bush is under impeachment, Secretary Gates and the military might be more apt to require a Congressional resolution for war before they are willing to engage in an attack on Iran. After all, they are subject to penalty for knowingly following illegal orders.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 

Up and Coming Newsweek Stories on Digg

Discover more Newsweek content on Digg