Afghanistan

Don’t Give Up on Afghanistan

The fact that Afghans haven't is all the more reason for us to stay engaged.

Shah Marai / AFP-Getty Images
High Hopes: Afghans remain optimistic despite it all
 
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Every time I step before a podium, someone will inevitably raise his hand, and say, "So, Mr. Hosseini, are you optimistic or pessimistic about the future of Afghanistan?" The first thing I do is remind the audience that I am a novelist. If I have any expertise, it is in the inner lives of the characters I have created in my books—which makes me spectacularly underqualified to answer a question of such magnitude. But even as I say these words—and they are true—I know that I am stalling because I do not have a ready answer. So I do give an answer, but one that in the end amounts to the verbal version of a shrug.

To say you are optimistic about Afghanistan opens you to charges of being hopelessly naive. I can hear the retorts in my head: Do you need reminding that there is a raging Taliban insurgency in the south that has taken nearly 6,000 lives this year? Don't you know that your country produces 93 percent of the world's opium? Are you not aware of the corruption in the government, the still-powerful warlords, the rampant poverty in the provinces, the illiteracy rate, the persistent oppression of women, the suicide bombings that kill children?

Yes, I am aware of these things. I traveled to Afghanistan this past September with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, and I saw for myself the high blast walls on the streets of Kabul, aimed at protecting against suicide attacks. Those walls did not exist the last time I was in Kabul, in the spring of 2003, and I didn't feel then the unease I did this time when I walked through crowded streets and bazaars. I saw thousands of young people in Kabul living in slums without work, without direction. In the north, I met homeless families of 20 or more who had spent the past two winters cooped up in holes they had dug underground. In village after village between Kunduz and Mazar-e Sharif, I met people who had no access to clean water, to a school for their children, to a clinic for their sick; families who lived on less than $1 per day—that is, if they could find work—and who received little or no help from a central government still struggling to meet the basic needs of its people.

Perhaps, then, I should be pessimistic about the future of Afghanistan. But that hardly takes an intellectual leap. And besides, what about the positive developments that have taken place over the past six years? When I visited Kabul in 2003, it looked like a war zone, a grim landscape of jagged debris, flattened buildings and roofless walls. The Kabul I saw in September is dramatically improved. Many of its neighborhoods have been rebuilt. I was happily surprised to visit cultural landmarks, like the famed gardens of Babur, and find them successfully renovated. In many towns, I saw children in uniform walking to school. School enrollment, in fact, has increased to more than 5 million children over the past five years. Land mines are being cleared, the press is relatively free (if under attack by religious conservatives) and telecommunication is booming. (Even in the poorest, most remote villages, I had the surreal experience of seeing old men in tattered clothes speaking on cell phones.) The rebuilt roads I traveled in northern Afghanistan were in excellent shape, and traffic on them was brisk, boding well for commerce.

And what message does relentless skepticism send to all the people—both Afghan nationals and expatriates—who are risking their lives trying to rebuild the beleaguered country? People like Dawood Salimi, an Afghan UNHCR worker I met in Kunduz, who has decided to remain in Afghanistan and help refugees even though a suicide blast in July barely missed his 3-year-old son. Or the countless rural teachers who refuse to leave their classrooms despite death threats from the Taliban.

Pessimistic or optimistic? Maybe it is too early—a handful of years after 9/11—to ask such a question about a country that is still recovering from nearly 30 years of war, famine, drought, extremism, lawlessness and massive displacement. Or maybe I, and even legitimate experts on Afghanistan, are the wrong ones to ask. Maybe someone should ask the Afghans.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Phylmore @ 12/14/2007 2:50:48 PM

    Cutting and running is NEVER an option - talk about loss of credibility. Part of the golden rule is cleaning up your own mess and finishing what you start.

  • Posted By: monkeyman @ 12/09/2007 3:57:39 PM

    I believe Harry Truman was a Democrat. So I guess that negates your comments. It's not a question of "cut and run", it's a question of How did we get in this mess? What realistically can be done? and How do we get out of there? You can NOT force Democracy on people who are not interested in it. Yes, I know it sounds like a noble idea; but it's like giving a loaded gun to a baby and expecting it will protect itself.

  • Posted By: t9900 @ 12/03/2007 8:41:07 PM

    Actually if you looked at facts our reasons to go in Afghanistan was to 1) capture/kill Bin Laden and Al-Queda and 2) get rid of the Taliban(?). Considering the less violence and casualties an Afghanistan we are partially successful. However, I've noticed a wried trend. Over the past months we are becoming more successful in Iraq but violence, casualties, and terrorist attacks are increasing in Afghanistan. I want success in both places but I'd rather this trend continue than reverse. Iraq as a larger population and more of our troops so increased violence in Iraq will causes more deaths than increase violence in Afghanistan. Though as I said, I'd rather have peace in both.

    When non-Americans refer to arrogant Americans they must be referring to those who want to cut our losses and run. That's just pathetic. It doesn't matter how we went in, it should matter that we stayed until the people are safe. If you want people to stop calling us arrogant, then maybe you should start caring for other people.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 

Up and Coming Newsweek Stories on Digg

Discover more Newsweek content on Digg