Don’t Give Up on Afghanistan

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Earlier this year the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission conducted a survey in 32 out of 34 provinces in Afghanistan, and found that nearly 80 percent of Afghans polled said that they felt optimistic about the future. Nearly 80 percent. I find this to be an extraordinary statistic (I suspect far fewer of us here in America would say the same about our own future). This finding isn't proof of a dramatic improvement in Afghan standards of living. Rather, it reflects the constitutional ability of Afghans to remain hopeful and optimistic in the face of overwhelming hardship. Which, to me, makes it a moral imperative that we in the West not give up on a people who have not given up on themselves.

The only certain thing about Afghanistan is this: without a genuine and sustained long-term commitment on the part of the United States and its allies, Afghanistan is doomed. Though Afghans take pride in their sovereignty, polls have repeatedly shown that the majority of Afghans view the foreign presence in their country favorably. They know that a weakened Western resolve will mean that the gains made so painstakingly will vanish swiftly. I suppose that then, if someone were to raise his hand and ask me about the future of Afghanistan, I would have a ready answer. For now, I will settle for the shrug.

Hosseini is the best-selling author of “The Kite Runner” and “A Thousand Splendid Suns.” He has served as a good-will envoy to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees since 2006.

© 2007

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Phylmore @ 12/14/2007 2:50:48 PM

    Cutting and running is NEVER an option - talk about loss of credibility. Part of the golden rule is cleaning up your own mess and finishing what you start.

  • Posted By: monkeyman @ 12/09/2007 3:57:39 PM

    I believe Harry Truman was a Democrat. So I guess that negates your comments. It's not a question of "cut and run", it's a question of How did we get in this mess? What realistically can be done? and How do we get out of there? You can NOT force Democracy on people who are not interested in it. Yes, I know it sounds like a noble idea; but it's like giving a loaded gun to a baby and expecting it will protect itself.

  • Posted By: t9900 @ 12/03/2007 8:41:07 PM

    Actually if you looked at facts our reasons to go in Afghanistan was to 1) capture/kill Bin Laden and Al-Queda and 2) get rid of the Taliban(?). Considering the less violence and casualties an Afghanistan we are partially successful. However, I've noticed a wried trend. Over the past months we are becoming more successful in Iraq but violence, casualties, and terrorist attacks are increasing in Afghanistan. I want success in both places but I'd rather this trend continue than reverse. Iraq as a larger population and more of our troops so increased violence in Iraq will causes more deaths than increase violence in Afghanistan. Though as I said, I'd rather have peace in both.

    When non-Americans refer to arrogant Americans they must be referring to those who want to cut our losses and run. That's just pathetic. It doesn't matter how we went in, it should matter that we stayed until the people are safe. If you want people to stop calling us arrogant, then maybe you should start caring for other people.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now