Forget War With Iran

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: meganm89 @ 12/06/2007 1:00:58 AM

    Saying "FORGET WAR WITH IRAN" is like saying forget all of our soldiers that have died in this war. The President reacted upon getting false information from outside forces. He lead us to war, and in the beginning, everyone was behind him. Now that we all see it was a costly mistake on our behalf, we want to back down? Give me a F*cking break. We once stood behind our president with honor and loyalty, as we watched our country fall on 9-11. Now we want to stand in front and say that the Bush Administration are the real ones who are to blame? Yea, they have probably made some HUGE mistakes, but elections are returning in 2008, maybe then we will have an administration who makes ALL the right choices, and does NOTHING wrong.

  • Posted By: marshal47 @ 12/06/2007 1:00:27 AM

    Michael, don't you and your employer Newsweek ever get tired of your liberal bias?It's a known fact that reporters like yourself, and media outlets like CNN, CBS, NBC etc are 80%-90% liberal, and vote for democrats. It's amazing to me that you think of yourself as unbiased. Have you ever voted for a Republican?
    But relative to the article, Iran continues to enrich uranium. Once that process is complete, it's only a matter of months before they can produce a bomb. Diplomatic pressure must remain strong agains the zealots running Iran, or the world, and Israel in particular, may face dire results. As usual, you, and the liberal media, have slanted the news. In this case it's the NEI report. R.B. Tampa

  • Posted By: D_Smart @ 12/06/2007 12:58:32 AM

    i enjoyed reading ur arcticle. It shows how disconnected our pres has been!! To me, he;s been that way for a long time! I'm so ready to see a Democratic prez in office who will bring our trooops home and bring down the astronimical gas prices!!

  • Posted By: D_Smart @ 12/06/2007 12:55:33 AM

    I enjoyed reading your article sir. It was well written and informative. I also agree with your assessment on the incorrect actions of the pres in his statments regarding Iran. The Bush's Chaneys, Rockefellers, and the rest of the fattened beauracrats need to move aside for this next dispensation of time in our lives. They have made enough trillions of $$ from peeps in the staggering gas prices. Enough $ 2 last their childrens, childrens, childrens, childrens lives. With that said, the pres is sounding totally disconnected from the truth of his own intell aganecies? Our troops our stretched out in distant places when they should be here working atively and helping Earth to be a more peaceful and intellectual planet. The troops could be here assisting in technological advances., where we "America" would employ diplomacy with other countries that we differ with.. Peace.

  • Posted By: marshal47 @ 12/06/2007 12:53:44 AM

    Test

  • Posted By: marshal47 @ 12/06/2007 12:52:13 AM

    Honestly, Michael Hirsch, don't you and Newsweek ever get tired of your unbalanced reporting, along with CNN, CBS, Time etc. It's no secret tht 80%-90% of reporters vote democratic, and you try to push your agenda through your magazine and dispatches. George Bush is on the right track on this issue. iran is still enriching uranium. It only takes a few months to create a bomb after that process is complete. We have to keep the pressure on Iran. They are a severe future threat to all civilized country's national interests.

  • Posted By: mkmuyanja @ 12/06/2007 12:45:16 AM

    PRESIDENT BUSH AND OTHERS LIKE HIM SHOULD UNDERSTAND THE WORLD IS BETTER WITHOUT WARS. BECAUSE WITH ITS THE MASSES THAT PAY THE PRICE FOR ACTIONS OF INDIVIDUAL PRESIDENTS. PLEASE LET THE WHOLE WORLD EMBRACE PEACE NOT WAR. Mudathiru M.K- Kampala

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 12/05/2007 3:21:56 PM

    There is only one solution to this problem, the removal of the Iranian regime. However, we can not "do it" for them, the Iranians themselves have to" do it", with the world's support. The people under 35 want change in Iran, they want to live like the "Beach Boys", and have big dreams like Donald Trump, they want their universities to be free where ideas can be argued without fear of repression. Let's learn from Iraq. We began sanctions against Hussein and then began with weapon inspectors. These actions are not effective. They just make the general population weaker(those who want change) and make the dictator stronger. If the Iranian people do not want change we cannot force them, it will just make things worse. The regime has to be removed as quickly as possible from within. There is no other alternative. Targeted airstrikes will just empower the dictatorship and turn pro American sentiment in the country. We need to let the Iranian people know that we will help them target the regime. As long as the regime is in place, it is always going to be a threat to the region and the rest of the world. Nukes or no nukes. Now is time to move, while America still has a strong military presence in Iraq.

    • Posted By: leodelaney @ 12/06/2007 12:44:51 AM

      Actually there is another soulution to this problem. The removal of the American regime. After all it is the Americans and only the Americans who in their fear of non-existent threats go around the world accusing small countries of being a threat to civilization, and threatening them with invasion and destruction if they do not conform to what we want. We have seldom done this in the past because we were a nation of honor and not a nation driven by fear. However in the past we never had an ignorant, incompetent as our leader and it is this ignorance and incompetence that has created all the bluster and bravado of a morally bankrupt administration. The inability to handle our problems at home and indeed even the ability to recognize what they are, leads to the creation of imaginary problems in the international sphere and a never ending series of futile arm waving to address them

      The advantage though is that we still have the right and the time to remove our beligerant and disgraceful regime and we shall do so in the near furure. Hopefully with the removal of malevolence and incompetency and its replacement by intelligence and forebearance, the United States will once again show itself to be the leader of the world and its hope for a better life, not as now its dispair of a better life, for those of us who live here.

  • Posted By: gunner86 @ 12/05/2007 11:41:03 PM

    Ok i dont agree with any of you. THE EYE, your so full of S$%# its not even funny. maybe you should go hang out with your buddy saddam hussein.
    i believe we did the right thing and if iran want a piece of us then let us go kick their a$$ too.

    • Posted By: The EYE @ 12/06/2007 12:43:55 AM

      Thank you for your comment but please remember all criminal interventions of the United States of North America.
      Granada. Nicaragua. Panama. Iran(before the Shah) Chile(Pinochet), Iraq and other ones suffered the blood criminal desire of your politicians. I think you should read the history of the empire built on somebody else's land.As you must know what you call your country it was built on the blood and corposes of the real owners.
      I hope you wake up and see the real damage that the so called democracy defenders are causing to humanity.
      THE EYE.

  • Posted By: Skyline_Blvd @ 12/06/2007 12:42:42 AM

    Perhaps it's worth the price??? Mr. Hirsch, I think you either forgot to add a smiley, or you've ended a perfectly good article with the craziest statement I've heard in months. Short of a real-life "Red Dawn", little could be more costly to the US than another pointless military foray into the Middle East. Personally, I feel that this country could use to swallow one more slice of humble pie, just so that the entire nation knows for damn sure that they can't afford to elect a pair of Bush-Cheney lookalikes this next time around.

  • Posted By: Fredfarmer @ 12/06/2007 12:41:42 AM

    Why are you including a picture of Hillary Clinton in this story? What does she have to do with a possible war with Iran? Is she a U.S. leader? Why don't you guys just report the news instead of trying to sell the American people a phony idea. It stinks as bad as Weapons of Mass Distruction

  • Posted By: Fredfarmer @ 12/06/2007 12:39:03 AM

    Why are you including a picture of Hillary Clinton in this story? What does she have to do with a war with Iran?
    Are you trying to sell her as some kind of American leader? instead of the Weapons of Mass Distruction tune.

  • Posted By: Fredfarmer @ 12/06/2007 12:37:12 AM

    Why are you including a picture of Hillary Clinton in this story? What does she have to do with a war with Iran?
    Are you trying to sell her as some kind of American leader? instead of the Weapons of Mass Distruction tune.

  • Posted By: nirak @ 12/06/2007 12:33:34 AM

    Saddam was not a nice person, but maybe exactly what Iraq needed.
    All that Bush has accomplished is he disturbed a hornest net and it will take more than our lifetime to get all the bees back into their hives.
    Seeing Bush ride his bike through Baghdad? LOL
    Bush doesn't go anywhere okie-magic. He can only go and shoot his mouth off with fellow Republicans and even most of them don't want to see him.

    .

  • Posted By: Skyline_Blvd @ 12/06/2007 12:33:20 AM

    Perhaps??? Perhaps it's worth the price??? There isn't much, short of a real-life "Red Dawn", that would be more costly to the US than another pointless war! Great article, HORRIBLE closing statement.

  • Posted By: Ilan_Z @ 12/06/2007 12:26:43 AM

    As person who is familiar very wel wth the region and the middle-east, I do not belive to even one wordf of this NIE. The Iranian regime (and the people too) will do whatever they can to become a nuclear authority in the region ASAP. This is a false estimat and the administration mst NOT accept it. What exactly the Iranians are doing with all these huge nocler facilities that they were building according to this NIE ? Chocolates.... ? I can tell you right a way (I was born and raised in the middle -east) that if nbody will PHYSICALLY stop them, they are going to have a nuclear weapons in their hands within less then 2 years.
    I 'm just wondering how exactly nuclear Iran will serve the U.S interests.
    Talks about "aggresive diplomacy" as Hilary Clinton is suggesting , is a HUGE bulshit.
    Physical elimination of these nuclear sites by any mean is the only option to save the area from another holocust and the entire world from world war III of the west against radical Islam headed by nucler Iran.

    Regards,
    Iln

  • Posted By: 32ndHOOAH @ 12/05/2007 9:35:12 PM

    DEMOCRATS STARTED THE BIG BROTHER PROGRAM, SO DEMOCRATS SHOULD SEE THE GOOD WE ARE DOING IN IRAQ. Iv'e been there, and I don't know if it's for oil, or to possition ourselves for something bigger, BUT, I saw women shopping and children playing like they never were able to in the past without getting killed. So how about the spoiled little political drama queens think about that for a second. Life is bigger than your x-box, your blanky, and your opinions. "ITS all about oil wah wah wah" Whatever. These people were living in a hell until we showed up and I pray, God forbid this ever happen, but if we were under tyranny like that, that another country, a big country would come help us. Get over your spoiled little opinions, no one cares but your own people.

    • Posted By: kbledude1 @ 12/05/2007 9:39:36 PM

      what r u nuts. iraq was one of the most beautiful places in the middle east.... before the iran iraq war, 2 it was the sancations that killed that country set by the bush's .. the have destroyed that country bcause saddam would play ball with them, eat on those facts.......

      • Posted By: okie_magic @ 12/06/2007 12:23:16 AM

        Saddam was a cruel dictator and I'm glad he's gone, but at least the Iraqis had jobs, electricity, running water and access to health care when he was in power. There were also no suicide bombings, kidnappings or ethnic cleansing like we've seen recently.

        I'll finally believe Baghdad is safe when I see Bush ride his mountain bike through the city.

  • Posted By: learybe @ 12/05/2007 10:57:58 PM

    I think that President Bush has shown great courage and unwavering leadership since september 2001. I think that he has shown that by being tough on terrorism and not wavering in the face of growing negative public criticism has put the likes of Libya, Iran and North Korea on the hot seat and forced them to back down from their dangerous rhetorical pulpits. I believe that editorials such as this hurt our country. Comparing the current French Leadership with the leadership of Charles De Galle is absurd. President Kennedy was doing the same thing, but he was doing it because he realized that world leaders at the time realized the grave danger that the Soviet Union was. Please Mr. Hirsh step away from your ridiculous bias of the left and admit that your way of thinking is dangerous to our country.

    • Posted By: leodelaney @ 12/06/2007 12:20:30 AM

      Duh! And I also believe that when all this is over the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy, the Cheshire Cat and even Alvin and the Chipmunks and other strong leaders of this type will come out and tell the world what a great leader George Bush has been and why he belongs right up there with them. And on a perhaps more serious note it appears that the backing down from "dangerous rhetorical pulpits" has been done almost exclusively by the United States. The former Axis of Evil" none of whom had or were even close to WMD, are still there and are still laughing at the way the US gave in to them and enjoying the bribes they received for announcing they would no longer do something everyone knew they weren't doing anyway.

    • Posted By: engagemindbeforespeaking @ 12/05/2007 11:48:54 PM

      Absolutely unbelievable! It is mindless comments such as this one that assure the future holds in store an accelerated demise of American hegemony. The Chinese will be the winners of all these Middle East blunders, and will be laughing all the way to the bank for years to come.

  • Posted By: maria7777777 @ 12/06/2007 12:19:57 AM

    usa must forget war with iran forever!

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 12/06/2007 12:06:00 AM

    WHICH CANDIDATE CAN HANDLE THIS SITUATION BEST AND WHY? Provide PROOF; WHO HAS THE BEST SOLUTION??
    WITHOUT RUSSIA IRAN WOULD HAVE NOTHING. Why can't the pubic see that the real threat are the break-away republics of Russia(most notably the 5 Muslim States in Central Asia and the Ukraine)crime families in Eastern Europe and the technological advancement of China. Iran, Pakistan, India, all countries in Africa have no means of deploying a successful nuclear attack. Let's take care of the nuclear, chemical and biological weapons that already exist not on those that

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse