Back on Defense

2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll

http://www.votenic.com

The Only Poll That Matters.
Results Posted Every Tuesday Evening.

2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll

http://www.votenic.com

The Only Poll That Matters
Results Posted Every Tuesday Evening.

I think that any candidate that feels using a nuclear weapon is a viable option under any circumstance should not even be considered as a candidate. Nuclear weapons kill indiscrimantly,- hundreds of thousand of innocent people. It is just unacceptable.

I think that any candidate that feels using a nuclear weapon is a viable option under any circumstance should not even be considered as a candidate. Nuclear weapons kill indiscrimantly,- hundreds of thousand of innocent people. It is just unacceptable.

good ole usa borrowing money from communist china to expand their oil empire in the middle east. this is all a smoke screen and americans are dumb if they don't understand the fight is over what is under the ground. go ron paul!

good ole usa borrowing money from communist china to expand their oil empire in the middle east. this is all a smoke screen and americans are dumb if they don't understand the fight is over what is under the ground. go ron paul!

good ole usa borrowing money from communist china to expand their oil empire in the middle east. this is all a smoke screen and americans are dumb if they don't understand the fight is over what is under the ground. go ron paul!

The problem with Obama is exactly what Hillary Clinton has said....at least she has showed up to vote on these issues. instead, Obama has ducked them, and then convieniently issued statements on what he "would have done" or how he "would have voted". I would much rather have a person who at least shows up and states their positions openly, as president....then one who never shows up to begin with. As for John Edwards, he has flip/flopped on so many issues he has practically become the "Mitt Romney" of the DNC. Bootom line, if Democrats want to win in 2008, they will nominate Clinton, if they want to lose again, nominate Obama or Edwards...after 8 years of Bush, you would think they would want to win for a change.

Senator Clinton needs to realize that Pres. Bush is not open to communicate all that is really going on and because of that, she should not side with Pres. Bush at all. For all we know, the Pres. and other Repubs. may say something to ambush her! But, neverthe less, she is a leader.

About why can't she say she made a mistake or is in error...most common management training suggests to never admit openly to mistakes. It's no wonder many, not just Senator Clinton, will not admit to mistakes or errors. And, wouldn't you want to be correct as much as possible, common! Be terrified at Iran, and those who want to hurt America. All of us Americans need to be as objective as possible and not judge on emotions. Thank YOU!

Why can't Hilary Clinton ever acknowledge a mistake of judgment or a re-evaluation of position. Her Iran attack on others is the lates example of her constant need to be correct and abuse those who question or hold her accountable. These are not quality of a leader, are terrifying to me, and should be of concern to all.

Why can't Hilary Clinton just acknowledge an error or mistake (no one is perfect) rather than her continual attempt to attack her opponents and defend her demonstrablely contradictory or chnaged positions on topics. This level of "need to be right" paranoia is terrifying to me and a major concern for any effective leader to possess.

WHICH CANDIDATE CAN HANDLE THIS SITUATION BEST AND WHY? Provide PROOF; WHO HAS THE BEST SOLUTION??
WITHOUT RUSSIA IRAN WOULD HAVE NOTHING. Why can't the pubic see that the real threat are the break-away republics of Russia(most notably the 5 Muslim States in Central Asia and the Ukraine)crime families in Eastern Europe and the technological advancement of China. Iran, Pakistan, India, all countries in Africa have no means of deploying a successful nuclear attack. Let's take care of the nuclear, chemical and biological weapons that already exist not on those that do not exist. I really do not want to mention Iraq, but we are taking are eye of the real threat again

There is only one solution to this problem, the removal of the Iranian regime. However, we can not "do it" for them, the Iranians themselves have to" do it", with the world's support. The people under 35 want change in Iran, they want to live like the "Beach Boys", and have big dreams like Donald Trump, they want their universities to be free where ideas can be argued without fear of repression. Let's learn from Iraq. We began sanctions against Hussein and then began with weapon inspectors. These actions are not effective. They just make the general population weaker(those who want change) and make the dictator stronger. If the Iranian people do not want change we cannot force them, it will just make things worse. The regime has to be removed as quickly as possible from within. There is no other alternative. Targeted airstrikes will just empower the dictatorship and turn pro American sentiment in the country. We need to let the Iranian people know that we will help them target the regime. As long as the regime is in place, it is always going to be a threat to the region and the rest of the world. Nukes or no nukes. Now is time to move, while America still has a strong military presence in Iraq.

If GW's intelligence estimate was wrong the first time, don't you think we should step back and not jump to another wrong conclusion. Ahmadnutjob is bent on killing the infidel.

Republican talking points on Iran? Hello, there should only be American talking points on Iran and there can only be one president at a time. Bipartisanship beyond the shoreline is still not only a nice idea, its vital to our national security. Candidates who don't understand this, dem or GOP are idiots.

What short memories most people have - what did Hilary accomplish during 'Bill's' 8 years in the White House? Wasn't she suppose to reform the "health care system" for Americans without health insurance? Do any of you suppose that Bin Laden just appeared when GWB got elected? The problem with many Americans is that they have very short memories on the main issues that face this country. We are so conditioned by the 'media' to judge someone based on how they 'look' instead of what they accomplish. Bad things in history will indeed be repeated as many times as necessary until we humans start to remember what happened in the past and learn from it.

Old Bag, you say? Don't know if I'll vote for Hillary, think I'll wait and see and analyze what all the candidates have to offer, there's still time you know. But, let us look objectively and rationally before we think about mudslinging the personal quips. That's simplistic ridicule, leave that to the politicians, they're good at that. Besides when they do it, it has some factual basis and at least it sounds somewhat itelligent. Geeez, maybe it's a good thing you can't vote yet!