Back on Defense

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: kickbooti @ 12/05/2007 10:23:59 PM

    America, Please be intelligent enough not put an extremist like HC in the White house. If you think GWB was bad and extreme just wait until super B gets in there. I thought it was obvious what kind of person she was as the first lady and the way she comes across in public. America can do better and I hope they do. If I can become American fast enough I know who I will vote for and it won't be her. She is wrong on international issues and domestic issues. She says she will go after the rich but politicians always say that and then they go and squeeze the middle class. I think she is anti middle class, anti family and a rich spoiled old bag who is trying to say what ever it takes to get elected. Most politicians do say what ever they can to get elected and I would think that it is best to choose the lesser evil. Who ever is going to take less money away from our family and who ever is going to do what it takes to protect freedom. Who ever gets in is going to be challenged by the psyco facists anyway. The free World needs someone who will hit back hard enough that the scum will go back to hide in the mountain caves they live in. HC does not have it and never will.

  • Posted By: Simone12 @ 12/05/2007 10:05:44 PM

    One think is for sure no more W :-) THANK GOD

  • Posted By: Simone12 @ 12/05/2007 9:59:29 PM

    OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT ...At least he can pronounce nuclear and he can speak English unlike YOUR PRESIDENT ..... What Bush did about the Middle East is creating chaos and death. He lied and lied and lied......

  • Posted By: afterglow @ 12/05/2007 9:54:59 PM

    I???ll take a shrub any time over a terrorist sympathizer!

  • Posted By: Simone12 @ 12/05/2007 9:50:20 PM

    Afterglow :OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT ...At least he can pronounce nuclear and he can speak English unlike YOUR PRESIDENT ..... What Bush did about the Middle East is creating chaos and death. He lied and lied and lied......What about all the other country that are ready to develop nuclear weapons ? Is your Shrub going to invade them as well?

  • Posted By: afterglow @ 12/05/2007 9:47:05 PM

    I agree people need to wake up, but they need to look in a mirror. Hmm, decisions decisions. Vote for a criminal or a man who won???t pledge allegiance to the very country he wants to represent as president? If he won???t pledge allegiance to the U.S., what country WILL he pledge allegiance to? Gee, somewhere in the middle east?

  • Posted By: heathboatwright @ 12/05/2007 9:39:26 PM

    I keep hearing all you folks talk about the " Bush Adm. fear tactics". That man stood on a mound of 3000 dead bodies in New York and he had to look this nation in the eye and decide which direction he was going to take it. Call it what you want, but unless your one of those wacko, nutjobs, who believes that our government was behind 911, you can't classify anyone's effort to defend this nation as "fear tactics". Were you not afraid already on 911? Besides, many of you should open your eyes to the fact that we went into Iraq so we could be next to Iran and apply "pressure" . I know none of you like this because we never found thoe damn wmd's. But you have to wise up and face the fact that sometimes in politics you have no good options. Bush could not stand there in front of the American people and say "look folks. We need to get to Iran because right now they are the greatest threat we face because they have alot of oil and they can fund alot of terrorism. So let's jump into Iraq and see if that gets there attention". You can't say this in public office because you will spoil any chance whatsoever at a diplomatic solution and you simply encourage them rachet up efforts to go nuclear. After 911, people like AKMADEANA=JIHAD have to be taken muuch more serioulsy. And I will vote for no one who who does not defend the place where I live...................even if it means sending people to die.

  • Posted By: afterglow @ 12/05/2007 9:32:58 PM

    lrlopez, you're the one who needs to wake up. Not that I'm a big fan of Bush, but at least he did something about the middle east and is willing to do something about Iran. Gee, should the White House pretend that it isn't a threat like Carter did?

  • Posted By: backtoComonSense @ 12/05/2007 9:09:15 PM

    Im not sure how I am going to vote this go arouns. I am sure its not for Hillery. The more she talks the more i see "The Look" I get the feeling she wants the President so bad she will say and do anything to get it. Its a feeling I get when the Creepy guy down the street looks at you in the store, or the feeling you get after seeing roaches run when u turn on a light...ewwwwww type feelin... Do we really want anyone controlling our lifes, who gives us that feeling?>

  • Posted By: lrlopez @ 12/05/2007 8:44:30 PM

    You Dirty Rotten Scoundrels. What about Bushs strategy, he is the one that has been pushing the ajenda
    because if we dont have an enemy, they dont have a leg to stand on. Why would you pull Hillary into this because she is the first women that will become President and would be a fine intelligent one at that.
    God I've missed thinking of my President as intelligent. For years we ve had The Emperor with no clothes
    reaaly guys get use to it, she will be President and my Macho self will gladly vote for the eloquent and gutsy
    Former First Lady. What A Women our soon to be President, God Bless America we will finally wake up

  • Posted By: tsalagi @ 12/05/2007 8:30:35 PM

    there is only one solution! Remove all old politicans i.e. Hillary et al. from office and purge the WH of cold war era theoreticians. Clintonistas and Bushites leave now while you still know everything..... like teenagers.

  • Posted By: ecco123 @ 12/05/2007 4:02:42 PM

    Anybody who thinks Iran is no longer a threat is obviously unaware of current events, their agenda, and their intentions for the Israel, Britain, and the west. Their leadership has only one goal, as they've always had: to destroy Israel and any western non-Islamic state or nation. I recommend to anybody who hasn't seen the documentary "Obsession, radical Islam's war against he West", buy it immediately. You will never look at the middle east the same again...

  • Posted By: ecco123 @ 12/05/2007 4:02:28 PM

    Anybody who thinks Iran is no longer a threat is obviously unaware of current events, their agenda, and their intentions for the Israel, Britain, and the west. Their leadership has only one goal, as they've always had: to destroy Israel and any western non-Islamic state or nation. I recommend to anybody who hasn't seen the documentary "Obsession, radical Islam's war against he West", buy it immediately. You will never look at the middle east the same again...

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 12/05/2007 3:11:49 PM

    WITHOUT RUSSIA IRAN WOULD HAVE NOTHING. Why can't the pubic see that the real threat are the break-away republics of Russia(most notably the 5 Muslim States in Central Asia and the Ukraine)crime families in Eastern Europe and the technological advancement of China. Iran, Pakistan, India, all countries in Africa have no means of deploying a successful nuclear attack. Let's take care of the nuclear, chemical and biological weapons that already exist not on those that do not exist. I really do not want to mention Iraq, but we are taking are eye of the real threat again.

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 12/05/2007 2:30:28 PM

    There is only one solution to this problem, the removal of the Iranian regime. However, we can not "do it" for them, the Iranians themselves have to" do it", with the world's support. The people under 35 want change in Iran, they want to live like the "Beach Boys", and have big dreams like Donald Trump, they want their universities to be free where ideas can be argued without fear of repression. Let's learn from Iraq. We began sanctions against Hussein and then began with weapon inspectors. These actions are not effective. They just make the general population weaker(those who want change) and make the dictator stronger. If the Iranian people do not want change we cannot force them, it will just make things worse. The regime has to be removed as quickly as possible from within. There is no other alternative. Targeted airstrikes will just empower the dictatorship and turn pro American sentiment in the country. We need to let the Iranian people know that we will help them target the regime. As long as the regime is in place, it is always going to be a threat to the region and the rest of the world. Nukes or no nukes. Now is time to move, while America still has a strong military presence in Iraq.

  • Posted By: FreeThinking_Rob @ 12/05/2007 2:29:22 PM

    I am Glad Hilary's Judgement was exposed once again. This is another example of how America is desparate for CHANGE!!!!! We must get rid of these people who want to keep us afraid. How can a people who are always living in fear be free??? The republican agenda to convince our nation to give up our liberties while in a fearful trance is turning on its head. All involved in this agenda, Democrat or Republican should be cast out, never to return again.

  • Posted By: FreeThinking_Rob @ 12/05/2007 2:18:33 PM

    Unbelievable! It is ridiculous to have such an emotional voting public in our advanced civilized society. Like a bunch of Barbarians, we want to fight fight fight, because it takes less brain power. Thats what we teach our children correct? We teach them to defend themselves, but foremost we teach them to solve their propblems rationaly. High emotion and logic rarely coexist in the same space if ever. Arent we tried of being controled by fear? People complain about the Holocost, but the same kind of paranoid tactics was used on the German people and created an atmosphere of Hate, emotion and fear, of which the Holocost could exist.

  • Posted By: tdenbeck @ 12/05/2007 2:02:33 PM

    The Intel Report only stated that Iran had stopped "Weapons!" - What about their Uranium Enrichment for "Energy?" - There are different grades of Uranium. So the Question is still out there and needs to be
    answered - so he has a bunch of Shells sitting around but what about the type of Uranium being produced. Bush is right and alot of people may be eating their words - according to Uranium Grade Levels and the Policies that surround them. True in fact the "Weapons" program was officially ended but lets see about the Grade of Uranium being produced.

  • Posted By: tadenbeck @ 12/05/2007 1:59:14 PM

    The Intel Report only stated that Iran had stopped "Weapons!" - What about their Uranium Enrichment for "Energy?" - There are different grades of Uranium. So the Question is still out there and needs to be
    answered - so he has a bunch of Shells sitting around but what about the type of Uranium being produced. Bush is right and alot of people may be eating their words - according to Uranium Grade Levels and the Policies that surround them. True in fact the "Weapons" program was officially ended but lets see about the Grade of Uranium being produced.

  • Posted By: pdmack @ 12/04/2007 10:13:49 PM

    So Clinton risks American lives by going along with Bush...and gets it wrong...again. She has never beaten the Republicans in anything in her life. She is the Democrat most hated by Republicans but also has the most conservative voting record. In other words, she capitulates on core Democratic principles and still manages to anger Independents and Republicans.

    • Posted By: RHann @ 12/05/2007 1:50:13 PM

      Very pathetic! If you paid more attention to news rather then Hillary beating a Republican you might remember as we speak our troops are dying because the Iranian Gaurd has weaponsprovided by Mahmoad Ahmadinejad. This vote was to declare him as a terrorist. Do you think we should revise that now and call this maniac a friend. He also thinks the Holocost was made up by the West. God, you people!
      RHann

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse