Starting From Scratch
There's much wrong with how America trades on its status in the world, says Ron Paul. He's got fixes.
Politics: Report From the Front
Exclusive: Ron Paul Video Interviews
Howard Fineman's exclusive interview with Rep. Ron Paul in our Report From the Front series.
Attention must be paid to Dr. Ron Paul, the 110-proof libertarian in the Republican race. He's had a surprisingly strong online fund-raising push and now has at least $10 million in the bank. In Iowa, according to the new NEWSWEEK Poll, he's got 8 percent support among likely GOP caucusgoers, and he's a legit wild card in more-independent New Hampshire. After taping "The View," of all things, he met last week with NEWSWEEK'S Howard Fineman to defend his controversial views:
Fineman: Why are you such a hit on the Internet?
Paul: It's the message. It's the fact that people aren't very comfortable with their economic future. They don't like the intrusion of their privacy, don't like what the war's doing, and they hear a little bit about me and they'll go to a Web site or my congressional Web site and find out how I voted, what I stand for, and say, "Wow, that's what I believe in." Then they get enthusiastic and spontaneously start organizing for the campaign … And I take a very strong stand against taxation and regulation on the Internet, and it sort of fits the libertarian spirit of communication.
You don't criticize tax resisters. Why?
Civil disobedience is a legitimate tool in a free society, but you have to suffer the consequences. I don't go and preach that that is what we should be doing … If they are defending [their interpretation of] the Constitution, they know what they're doing. This money is supporting evil in the world, through pre-emptive war [in Iraq]. I mean, that's pretty evil as far as I'm concerned: so much waste in a system of government that has just overrun our liberties. In many ways it's heroic that people are willing to risk their freedom to defend what they think is freedom. It's just, I do not promote it and do not participate in it.
Do you support any limit on private ownership of guns or weapons?
Sure. The Second Amendment means the federal government can't interfere with your right to have a weapon to defend yourself. The type of weapons weren't defined, of course, in the Constitution, but if you live next door to me and I thought you were working on a 500-ton bomb, I would say there's a clear and present danger. So there's a limit. I might ask the officials to get a proper search warrant to find out if you are, because this could be very dangerous.
Other than Afghanistan, where you supported military action, is there any other place in the world where we need to reserve the right to take military action?
No—no place in the world today. We are so powerful and so capable that we spend more money than everybody else put together. Nobody is threatening this country militarily and nobody can threaten our liberties. I have a greater concern for our civil liberties under attack here at home by the executive branch, judicial branch and legislative branch.
If you don't win, will you support the GOP nominee and promise not to run on the Libertarian or any other ticket?
I'm not promising any of those things. If we have a Republican nominee that has convinced me they have come around on foreign policy … I would consider it. As far as running on a third-party ticket, or [as an] independent, or Libertarian, I have no plans to do that.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »



Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: Wendeen @ 02/04/2008 12:30:47 PM
Comment: Panama is set to double its traffic of ships through the Panama Canal by 2014, which will further erode US sovereignty since more and more East-West trade will go through "them" rather than us. We need to heed Dr. Paul's legislative attempts to regain sovereign control of the Panama Canal. As Paul tells us, Panama has only the population of Atlanta. They and the global bankers who support them should not be dictating so much of our future.
Posted By: WKlein @ 02/04/2008 8:45:08 AM
Comment: Great interview!
If you want to see the importance of US sovereignty and Constitutionalism, also examine Dr. Paul???s attempts to maintain American sovereignty over the Panama Canal in the 1970s, shown in his newsletter.
http://www.tnr.com/downloads/freedomApril1978.pdf
When the US gave up sovereignty over the Canal to Panama, it helped empower, as he eloquently puts it, a ???two bit dictator??? with ties to Castro. Dr. Paul argues with great passion that a country as strong as America should not let little countries be the boss. After the Canal was given up, the globalist international bankers got a lot of payback, and now you can see the result. A war to get back the Canal failed in 1989, and young people don???t even remember it. That group of greedy bankers and small Marxist countries now threaten to take over the entire United States. Go figure. The great US once had sovereignty over other areas of the world as well, but now all is being lost, but that would not be the case if we had obeyed the wise advise of Dr. Paul 30 years ago.
Wilbur Klein
Posted By: djonesss @ 02/03/2008 9:46:45 PM
Comment: The fourth quarter FEC reports reveal that Congressman Paul has received more donations from the military than all other republican candidates combined.