Watching Torture

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Sailfast @ 12/11/2007 2:21:37 PM

    Physical Torture, is simply with out justification. It is a violation of the Rules of War, of the Geneva Convention and the common dignity of mankind.
    That is not to say that questioning, using the Pavlovian Method or of the use of pharicology to obtain information should not be used.
    Therein there is the danger that the information gained is or has a questionable validity, however, questioning of the physical type, without reguard to the exact method, is for the same reason, virtually worthless because after a short exposure, the subject will, quite literally sell his soul to make it stop, often telling completely dilusional fabrications in a vain attempt to satisfy the questioners.

  • Posted By: sot_doc @ 12/11/2007 2:35:20 AM

    Tortures bad, okkk!

    • Posted By: 1of1000 @ 12/11/2007 2:07:15 PM

      The wrong oriented system who brings about the situation is more to be blamed.

  • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 12/10/2007 3:30:38 PM

    Some of the comments here shows that the US has the same types of sick people that the current administration tries to pretend only exist in other countries. All torture is evil, no matter the pallid justifications attempted by the sadistic that against in every culture. Thankfully, most people in America are not demented sadists, such as the torture apologists that have come out of the woodwork lately.

    • Posted By: bochoa2 @ 12/10/2007 3:38:27 PM

      I bet your the kind of man that would let a person off if they raped and killed your child. You'd justify your moral values and advocate to not end that persons life. We don't live in a dream world. We live in merciless, and disgusting world. Some things need to be done.

      • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 12/10/2007 3:49:59 PM

        I know what I'm not. I'm not a sadist like you. Every culture has their sick folks. Fascism of all varieties tends to bring them to the front. You're no different.

        • Posted By: scope213 @ 12/11/2007 1:32:42 PM

          We're sick people because..? We want to defend ourselves from lunatics? I think you do live in some dream world. Like I said in my previous comment, I wish we can alll hold hands and sing kumbaya but unfortunetly if you haven't noticed there are some very determined if not berserker rage type people that want us dead. Sooo, I'm not sure what we sould do...maybe just do nothing and hope for the best and go back to collecting care bear toys. You are the soft underbelly of our nation and one day our nation will eventually flip and expose it.....thanks to people like you that take our freedom for granted and forget we can lose it in a blink of an eye.

  • Posted By: navyet_94f @ 12/10/2007 11:15:49 PM

    This story has no basis in reality. The "reporter" has no proof of what was on those tapes. He has decided to make a name for himself and obviously meet an agenda by mentioning thing he saw over 30 years ago. The CIA normally doesn't video interrogations. The tapes existence should never have been revealed. The enemy should not know our techniques. He says torture was on the tapes, no proof...just dragging the U.S. throught the mud.

    • Posted By: 1of1000 @ 12/10/2007 11:49:47 PM

      You'd better practice some reality.
      All professional interrogations are taped for interpretation, they are not sadist they are doing it for purpose.
      Knowing the torture procedure does not help the person under torture.
      Enemies are the abusers of power. "...the strongest man in the world is the man who stands most alone." good job!

      • Posted By: dogman @ 12/11/2007 9:19:31 AM

        10f1000 your values are corrupted, repent.

    • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/11/2007 12:02:04 AM

      Well lots of people say the U.S does torture, and surely they will be punished for it, the torturers I mean.

  • Posted By: navyet_94f @ 12/10/2007 11:25:52 PM

    You should be ashamed of yourself...pompus ASS! You accuse without proof our government of torture. You have NO PROOF!! I know the tapes were destroyed (haha no proof), maybe Pres. Bush was the second shooter on the grassy knowl?? Luckily for you there are dedicated Americans (unlike you) who risk their lives and miss their families so idiots like you don't get thrown in jail or disappear (like other countries). You are welcome from a military member. You are welcome, ASS.

    • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/10/2007 11:59:40 PM

      MY god, this is the kind of people that got sent to foreign countries to pollute the environment with their existance. How can he even be in a military. Pretty telling about what the American military is like, they're probably all outcasts. I guess money doesn't always improve people or benefit a country. Talk about torture. He's living proof.

      • Posted By: dogman @ 12/11/2007 9:17:27 AM

        Hawkmoon007, water boarding has been prosecuted as torture since the turn of the 20 th century. And the good family men looked too cooly on was the point.

    • Posted By: sot_doc @ 12/11/2007 2:52:54 AM

      navyet_94f is just a little confused, naive, and uninformed. navyet_94f does not yet realize that he/she is defending the freedoms that allow open debate such as this. By the way, be prepared to have a one way converstaion with the Secret Service over that Bush comment!

      • Posted By: dogman @ 12/11/2007 9:12:39 AM

        You are a disgrace to the Uniform navyet_94f. You enjoy the undermining of American law based on our founding fathers ideals, the US Constitution. Yes, there are dedicated Americans serving us in uniform. Two of which refused to torture. And that is what is happening, people are disappearing and getting threwn in jail without being told why they're in jail or having evidence brought against them. But Bush did call an independent contractor who were paid hansomly to waterboard. I think that is why we kept getting our terror alert level changed. Navy_yet you would make a good officer in blackwater.

    • Posted By: hawkmoon007 @ 12/11/2007 1:10:31 AM

      Re-read the article - No statement was ever made that torture was or was not on the destroyed tapes - nor was there any claim that he knows what is on the tapes. Look before your leap people. He writes "I THINK I know why...the head of the CIA...destroyed those two videos" and "Why do I SUSPECT this?" and "There MUST HAVE BEEN...interrogators, and an interpreter". Why am I pointing this out? Not because of semantics - because again - the point of the article wasn't to make false claims - it was to paint a picture and draw parallels to what he himself had seen. He's saying "Look, I've seen how bad torture can be and what typically ends up on these tapes...I don't know what's on there...but the fact that they were destroyed should alarm you...alarm you to the point that you realize how serious of an issue this is".

    • Posted By: 1of1000 @ 12/10/2007 11:56:18 PM

      There are proof but you like to be blind. If there there was no picture from Abu Gharib you were talking the same ... IDIOT.

  • Posted By: binthere @ 12/11/2007 9:06:47 AM

    As someone who has undergone torture in many forms, i know that my life will never be 'normal' ever again. Every tiny reminder ,be it a smell or sound, or someone who just resembles one of my torturers sends me into an abyss of terror that many times sinks me straight into a pit of deep suicidal despair. It would be a mistake for any of your readers to think the terror ends when the action stops.

  • Posted By: Looey323 @ 12/11/2007 4:30:32 AM

    I am wondering, after reading the comments, if the attitudes expressed have anything to do with the attacks on religion and especially on Christianity in our country in the last many years. Things like banning the Bible from Public schools, and being politically correct in keep people free from religious beliefs so someone will not be offended by hearing of right and wrong, etc.

    I wonder how many of those who made comments could actually tell me what Biblical Christianity teaches in these situations, or if American is no longer a "Christian Nation" and this is good?

    I read a Quotation once that I liked, and I think is applicable; wish I could remember by whom; perhaps someone can help? Anyhow, "America is Great because America is Good, and when America ceases to be good, she will cease to be Great." Is this not starting to happen?

    • Posted By: dogman @ 12/11/2007 9:02:09 AM

      As I understand it, aren't the military and CIA the most Ardent Christian-ists? So what is confusing us is how a President who prays hourly can advocated torture and mislead the American people with fear mongering. "If you believe in God out of fear who would surely change your mind if the devil were to appear." Stop attacking the left and condemn the right.

  • Posted By: dogman @ 12/11/2007 8:43:30 AM

    The Law is the best way to prevent torture. Destroyed evidence is how torture is allowed to remain a tool of the powerful. We have let our democracy become a shell to authortarianism. Kidnapping people and later abandoning them in the middle of nowhere when we discover we took the wrong person-Rendition. Holding Americans in cruel and unusal detention-isolation for months if not years. Torture, secret prisions, and now destroying evidence. Could this be the policies we advocate our Arab allies to use in the Mideast?

  • Posted By: RangerBill @ 12/10/2007 3:55:37 PM

    This article is fiction and conjecture--- the implication is that the author knows what is on the destroyed tapes and that it is the equivalent to what he's seen in the past from other cases. Guess what? I've seen films of Nazi atrocities during WWII. That doesn't mean that all actions during all wars are equivalent. I take the CIAs statement at face value... the tapes showed sensitive information and techniques. Furthermore, the media's definition of "torture" is ridiculous. During Abu Ghraib, the media referred to having ridiculous pictures taken of prisoners as torture- while it is completely unprofessional and should have been punished accordingly, silly pictures and compromising positions are far preferable to 'amputation of all limbs'. Or beheading ala Daniel Pearl. Or, any other conduct being used against the US on a daily basis. One last thought: NO terrorist attacks since 9/11.

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 12/10/2007 4:06:37 PM

      You obviously aren't informed on all that went on in Abu Ghraib. A lot of it was torture by anyone, except the most deviant sadist's definition. I suggest you Google it.

      • Posted By: RangerBill @ 12/10/2007 4:17:22 PM

        I was actually in Baghdad as a member of the USSOCOM HQ, and participated in a screening of temporary detention centers under our command to ensure we had proper controls in place to maintain a professional environment. I am pretty informed. I am also very aware that torture is not condoned by the military. Aside from Google and the Internet, what is your source of information? Wikipedia?

        • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 12/10/2007 4:22:11 PM

          So now we know your vested interest and can assess the veracity of your comments accordingly. Thank you for your disclosure.

          • Posted By: RangerBill @ 12/10/2007 4:30:47 PM

            Yeah-- I have the "vested interest" of being a veteran from Iraq. Watch out for me--- I might actually have views that contradict the left wing agenda and liberal media bias. The funny thing about the left--- they want free speech for everyone except those that disagree with them. My comments are based on reality and first hand knowledge. Yours are based on what? What's your vested interest?

            • Posted By: Thoughtmaker @ 12/10/2007 4:35:00 PM

              Well Johnsonium, enlighten us some more...this is getting interesting

              • Posted By: mmouse4540 @ 12/10/2007 5:02:19 PM

                Johnsonium -
                I wouldn't be slamming the military, for they protect your right of freedom of speech.

                Again, what are your experiences and/or credentials (other than your astute common sense)?

                What have you done for this country? Peace Corps, Military, CCC

                • Posted By: RangerBill @ 12/10/2007 5:12:02 PM

                  He hasn't done anything--- he attends a northeastern liberal arts college that his parents pay for, gets middling grades, and hopes to someday "save the world"-- at least that's what he says. Secretly, he's hoping a family friend will give him a job making $100000 in some corporation. Don't worry, in 10 years, he'll have a family, will cross the road to avoid homeless people, and will be a moderate Democrat.

                  • Posted By: sot_doc @ 12/11/2007 3:07:19 AM

                    I think rendition would be a good experience for Johnsonium, then he can come back and speak knowledgably about the subject!

            • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 12/10/2007 4:41:03 PM

              Mine are based on logic, something sorely lacking in the people indoctrinated in the "conservative agenda". Did they teach you to talk in talking points in the military?

              • Posted By: RangerBill @ 12/10/2007 4:58:26 PM

                I have a feeling even the libs on this blog can identify you as a screaming maniac. You've responded to everyone who even mildly disagrees with you. Yeah--- I have a "conservative agenda"!!? I am just a guy with an opinion and a little life experience. YOU clearly have an agenda, and that's okay--- as Thoughmaker said: wink-wink.

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 12/10/2007 4:10:54 PM

      One thought: Terrorist attacks worldwide way up since our invasion of Iraq and subsequent policy blunders, not down.

      • Posted By: RangerBill @ 12/10/2007 4:22:47 PM

        To be candid, I really don't care about worldwide terrorism. I am a citizen of the US, and all I really care about is terrorism against the US and it's allies. There have been no terrorist attacks on US soil since 2001. I look forward to the day when our new ally, Iraq, is a peaceful country and the violence ends there. I believe our policies will hasten that day, if we stay the course.

        • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 12/10/2007 4:28:22 PM

          Worldwide attacks on Americans are way up under Bush and his "war on terror". There? Now do you care?

          • Posted By: RangerBill @ 12/10/2007 4:38:26 PM

            Yet you are safe and sound and free to write anything you want. You go to bed at night and all you have to worry about is how bad the administration is... isn't it wonderful? Meanwhile, my peers are out there on deployment making sure that your freedom is maintained. Aside from military deaths in the war, which according to one of your responses were done not by "terrorists", but by "enemy combatants" who are just out of uniform, when has an attack in the US happened since 9/11?

            • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 12/10/2007 4:43:20 PM

              I want to join the military. Then, I don't have to actually have a good argument. I can simply shout down whomever I like and say, "I'm sacrificing for this country, what have you done?" It's brilliant. I want in!

              • Posted By: Thoughtmaker @ 12/10/2007 4:54:53 PM

                Nice way to dodge the issue that Bill is making. He has a legitimate point. "Irony"...that's "sequitor", right professor?

              • Posted By: RangerBill @ 12/10/2007 4:52:40 PM

                So join--- it's all-volunteer. If you're physically fit and can pass the ASVAB, there's a place for you. By the way, asking you questions is "shouting you down"? I've re-read my comments--- I don't think anything I wrote was an attack on you. Simply stating the truth. You ARE safe tonight because of people who do make a sacrifice for you. Just as I am. The only difference is, I think I appreciate it. Probably because I've seen the other side. The funny thing is--- if you bothered to read my original comment, I am absolutely correct. The author saw 2 films, NOT from the US, and connected it to the CIA, WITHOUT ANY evidence. No facts. Nothing. And, somehow, you've managed to spin it into an anti-administration rant.

  • Posted By: sot_doc @ 12/11/2007 2:40:06 AM

    If you have not done so, watch the Battle of Algiers (the three disk, re-release set)!

  • Posted By: whoislike@yahoo.com @ 12/11/2007 2:11:22 AM

    An excellent article pointing out what the truth is behind our "enhanced interrogation techniques". Each time I hear about our torturing people at our mercy, I grow more ashamed of being an American. My parents came here after the holocaust and we carried that horror with us as a family, not only the deaths, but the capricious torture that took place within the camps. My only defense against that horror swallowing my life was the ideal that I lived in the United States and that our society, insititution, and laws were constructed in such a way as to prevent abuses. Why this affects me so is now America is no better than Nazi Germany, Iranian Savak, the Soviet Union, and other purveyors of torture and tryanny. Not because the US has sunk to their level, yet, but because I now know that the USA is not a unique country, with a unique character, with a unique ideal. It is a base and gross as any other country and that city on that moral highground is now dark.

  • Posted By: hawkmoon007 @ 12/10/2007 8:44:25 PM

    Many are missing the point here. This isn't an article about taking sides - it's an article about how serious torture is. Regardless of if and when and where and how and to what extent it's used (be it as the reporter himself experienced, waterboarding, or whatever actually transpired in those tapes), the point is that we should treat the use of torture very seriously and not let ourselves become complacent and apathetic when politicians and the media attempt to lessen the impact of it by their use of anasthetic vocabulary. Nothing should ever be swept under the rug. In a civilized, democratic society, whether we condone the use of torture or not, WE as a people need to come to a consensus on EXACTLY how we stand and not let it be controlled by a handful of elitists that destroy tapes and sweep the details under the rug. We need transparency, and we need to decide as a whole, do we want torture or not? If we do, how much is okay? How much evidence do we need before subjecting someone to it? The only thing that is certain is that we can't allow for the possibility that potentially innocent or at least semi-innocent people are being dismembered or worse without our knowledge and without our consent....enough said.

    • Posted By: navyet_94f @ 12/10/2007 11:21:33 PM

      We aren't missing the point. If the author of this article just talked about the horrors of torture that is fine. He made statements that torture was on the video tapes. There is no proof of torture...zero, yes the answer is we will never know because the destroyed the tapes. The tapes' existence shouldn't even be known..period. It is called intelligence, counter-intelligence, and you don't want the enemy to know our techniques (I'm not talking torture, but coersion, lying, and manipulation). I have fought in the war, these are serious peopel we are dealing with. I am not saying we should torture, but you don't give them ammo to use on this country......period.

      • Posted By: hawkmoon007 @ 12/11/2007 1:07:21 AM

        Re-read the article - No statement was ever made that torture was or was not on the destroyed tapes - nor was there any claim that he knows what is on the tapes. Look before your leap people. He writes "I THINK I know why...the head of the CIA...destroyed those two videos" and "Why do I SUSPECT this?" and "There MUST HAVE BEEN...interrogators, and an interpreter". Why am I pointing this out? Not because of semantics - because again - the point of the article wasn't to make false claims - it was to paint a picture and draw parallels to what he himself had seen. He's saying "Look, I've seen how bad torture can be and what typically ends up on these tapes...I don't know what's on there...but the fact that they were destroyed should alarm you...alarm you to the point that you realize how serious of an issue this is".

      • Posted By: 1of1000 @ 12/11/2007 12:16:25 AM

        I am not saying they should publish all videos they have publicly, but there is no justification on destroying those videos. Experts can judge if it was torture or not. Obviously something has gone terribly wrong.

  • Posted By: ProudLiberal @ 12/10/2007 5:37:26 PM

    To all the RangerBill(s): Why do you always resort to personal attacks? Your argument is absurd. Most parents do help pay for college. Isn't that what we celebrate in America -- the freedom and bounty we have. Have your parents provided nothing for you? Perhaps that's why you come across so cynical and bitter. Plus, what difference does it make. Do you apply the same "silver spoon" standard to Bush or Cheney.

    We could do a tit for tat thing here and I could say that perhaps your parents could have offered you an education so that you might have a broader education to use as a resource in making your absurd points. But, you're too easy of a target. It's so tired to use labels like "intellects" and "liberals" to villify someone. Next time you pray -- think about who you're praying to. I think Jesus wouldn't approve of torture or war or the way we are conducting ourselves as a nation.

    What kind of society are we creating when we villify someone for being caring "bleeding heart liberals" and we rationalize beating up or killing someone for information. Seems like we took Saddam out for the same tactics. What hypocrisy!

    When did education and compassion become a bad "liberal" sensibility? I thought they were noble human attributes. Step back and try to objectively look at your argument -- it's shockingly disturbing.

    • Posted By: RangerBill @ 12/11/2007 12:22:32 AM

      BTW, brainiac, Cheney is the son of a Soil Conservation Agent for the US Dept of Agriculture--- worked his way through college... humble beginnings. Of course, obviously Bush does come from an austere background. My comment to Johnsonium was not to condemn parental support, it's to point out that opinions not based in any sort of experience are of dubious value. His silence to my questions confirms my hypothesis.

    • Posted By: RangerBill @ 12/11/2007 12:12:10 AM

      4-year Army scholarship to Virginia Military Institute, MBA from Boston University, 11 years in the US Army, where I attained the rank of Major... now I am a Vice President at a major financial institution... ProudLiberal--- you ARE a genius, aren't you!!? The funny thing about libs is that my messages, were "personal, cynical attacks"... did you even read what Johnsonium was writing about the military??? And, people who serve? No, of course not, because it doesn't suit your agenda.

    • Posted By: jweiss0001 @ 12/10/2007 5:50:59 PM

      I agree with you all life matters, even the life of an unborn child. The reason the rest of us can not stand liberals is because you selectively apply your absurdity. There is only one hypocrite in this conversation that is the one that cares more about the life of a blood thirsty murderer than that of a helpless child. Sad!!!!!!!

  • Posted By: pauz21 @ 12/10/2007 5:44:35 PM

    I really DO care. My ethics and morals say that torture is wrong. I have a grip - a grip on a reality that does not include incessant revenge warfare. What is America if not the ideals of freedom and lawful process written in the constitution? That is the America I would like to see held up as THE example of freedom. Torture has no place in a free America.

    • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/10/2007 11:41:31 PM

      Um what about outside America? The other 95%?

  • Posted By: drorlen @ 12/10/2007 4:47:36 PM

    I hate Newsweek. Way to jump the gun and outright call them 'torture tapes'. Then to imply those tapes are as brutal as those you witnessed decades ago. We caught the man that planned 9/11 in Pakistan years ago. He was waterboarded and broke in a minute. He gave up a tremendous amount of information. If forces had shot him dead because he drew a weapon apon his capture that would have been legal as it would have been in self defense. But what do we do in self defense when captured people have information that can and will harm us? Should we have politely asked him to give us information that could have saved lives? Torture is wrong, but as of now there is NO proof that what was on those tapes constituted torture and there were members of both parties and members of the govt that viewed and 'ok'ed their destruction. For you to call them 'torture tapes' and compare them to acts of inhumane brutal bloodetting and physical pain is grossly irresponsible.

    • Posted By: johnpp2 @ 12/10/2007 11:06:37 PM

      If we caught the man who planned 9/11, why hasn't the public been able to hear the enlightening story he must have told upon breaking under water torture? How exactly was it that a crude network of terrorists managed to defeat our NORAD defense systems--the systems for which we sacrifice almost 40% of our incomes so that we can feel cozy and safe? Who screwed up 9/11 so that a bumbling commercial airliner could perform an incredible aerial maneuver and strike arguably the most well-defensed building in the world? And why haven't they been exposed and then fired or jailed? Come on, you can't even give me one scapegoat? That's pathetic! Osama BAD! Bush GOOD!! Pass the mashed 'taters, Bubba!!!

  • Posted By: FLNATIVE @ 12/10/2007 5:03:37 PM

    Reading articles like this makes me sick to my stomach. All the bleedin heart liberals in this country who are worried about the "rights" of terrorists who's sole purpose is to destroy our way of life. I'm tired of hearing how the interrogation techniques are "not fair", cruel, and unusual punishment. What was fair about the innocent Americans who were beheaded with a knife by these a--holes and the video published on the Internet? What was fair about the hundreds of innocent victims in the Twin Towers who lost their lives on 9/11. I think all the people who think that using alternative methods of interrogating terrorists (and I would venture to say that the majority of them are KNOWN terrorists) move over to Iraq or Iran and see how long they last. I'm thankful that we have men and women in the military who are willing to go over there and fight for our freedoms.

    • Posted By: johnpp2 @ 12/10/2007 10:53:31 PM

      And which branch of the government do you work for again?

    • Posted By: johnpp2 @ 12/10/2007 10:53:25 PM

      And which branch of the government do you work for again?

  • Posted By: visitor @ 12/10/2007 6:35:30 PM

    The true terrorists are in the white house.

    • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/10/2007 10:40:41 PM

      I agree that going over to attack Iraq when there has been a problem from Afganistan by Pakistanis shows a volatility that is excessively violent to the entire world. Thousands of people have had their rights violated brutally with unrelated non-sensical motivations. There seems to be no end to this uncontrolled, brutal gorillas audacity and late teenage J.R. rebellion. He will go to hell after he's been to the Haague tribunal.

  • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/10/2007 10:08:51 PM

    This article is purely speculation that is misleading to uncritical minds. It is an example of poor journalism from a perspective of proper conduct. How can this low level of discussion that only speaks to sadisms.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse