Junk Food County

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Peyuke @ 12/16/2007 8:22:56 AM

    I see car ownership as the key variable in this discussion. If a person has a car, they can drive to nearby towns, suburbs, and cities to stock up. If a person is too poor to own a car and lives in a rural area, their options become extremely limited. The downfall of the North American diet and lifestyle is inextricably linked to the worship of the automobile. It is telling that the only reliable food source available to the people given as examples in this article is gas station convenience stores: places that exist mainly to serve the automobile and sell "food" only as a side business. business.

    • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/16/2007 11:36:51 PM

      I never use a car and I always walk to a food store. Thankfully I don't live in such an illogical end-result of a society as yours. You will in my opinion not come out of your nationwide misery unless you stop behaving illogically and respect and honour nature. Nature is more intelligent than any man-made machine.

      • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 12/18/2007 3:54:43 PM

        SORRY, but we had to let mother nature go. She wanted health benifits, so we hired a Mexican instead so she is now called, Naturaleza De la Madre

  • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 12/13/2007 11:30:51 AM

    Your a most fascinating socialist, and even though you loathe me, I bear you no malice! I have never said that individuals don't have the freedom to do what they want with their money. I am a firm believer that individuals with convictions can achieve great things, so if you believe what you say please show some initiative and do something about it. Just don't ask me to pay for it and you will have my total support. Any person who claims that help is needed and injustices are occurring are always welcome to give to charitable institutions or directly to the poor. Regrettably as is so often the case with you socialists, you want someone else's wallet to absorb the cost of your egalitarian ideals.

    To take money from citizens and have the federal government distribute it to the needy is as naive an idea as I have ever heard. The government is the PROBLEM, it is not the solution. Whenever people like you desire the redistribution of wealth, you believe the government can accomplish this? It can not because the government is bought and paid for for generations to come. Any money dedicated to the war on poverty will be stolen just as quickly as the money for the war on terror has been. Free markets and private industry are the only hope a man has to elevate his position. Americans who have the illusion of security because they have been lead to believe they are entitled to more from their government then it can supply. In truth, most of you are already totally screwed and will end your lives hungry and destitute, and any attempt to have the state provide for the hungry now, will only hasten the time until you join their ranks. I for one can read the writing on the wall, and will provide for myself and my family in the time to come. I hope you have the courage, insight and strength to do the same. As for the rest, they can get their own life boat, but if they try to climb in mine, they will met with a boot that pushes them further under.

    As far as your not being here when "it" happens, I can assure you, you wont be.

    • Posted By: angelus1967 @ 12/13/2007 11:58:03 AM

      No, I am not a socialist nor do I loathe you. You were coming across very harshly but in reading some of your other comments I can see that your ideas are more in the direction of self-reliance and leave me to mine that kill all the poor and the world will be a better place. At least I hope I am right about that./

      I do give time and money, I do not believe that the government owen people who choose not to work a free ride, and I think that most people can make a contribution of some kind. Obviously there are some that can't but unless you really want to get into eutanasia ther eis nothing we can do for those people except help them out and support them.
      I also do not believe in the redistribution of wealth; history has taught us that this is an unworkable idea, one that looks good on paper but never actually works. I think that helping people get on their feet in not the worst idea in the world; if you have someone who unexpectedly and through no fault of their own is thrust into a situation such as the death of a spouse or a catostrophic injury then we should provide some help. Perhaps daycare, retraining, and food / rent money for some fixed amount of time. NOT for life! Government has already proven inept at properly spendiing the money that we give them, they don't need more.
      My problem with your line of thought is that it seems you feel that you seem to lean towards true anarchy and fascism. No government at all, which can't work in modern times as people need some form of governance or chaos will reign supreme. And true fascism (to my understanding anyway) would tell us to kill the weak and unproductive lest they bring the rest of us down. There is room for both of our schools of thought to meet in the middle but the system we have now is simply unworkable in the long run.

      • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 12/13/2007 12:20:47 PM

        Well we Fascists got a well deserved bum rap after WWII and it will be generations before the word wont be equated with Auschwitz. Fascism was originally about the state and industry working together to further the aims of the people. Like any other belief it has been misused. As far as Hitler, although I am certainly not a fan, he was no worse than Stalin or Poll Pott. In fact communists have killed far more than fascists ever did.

        My basic point is that when one stands in line behind a person who uses food stamps in the grocery store and then stops at the liquor store with cash for lottery tickets and booze, one begins to feel they have been played for a fool. To then see the same person berate the system that feeds them and shelters them act as if they deserve more is intolerable

        • Posted By: angelus1967 @ 12/13/2007 12:52:32 PM

          And you are right, the communists have killed FAR more people than Hitler and his fascists ever did.

          • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/14/2007 12:21:59 AM

            Communism exists/has existed in almost half the world so of course the numbers will be higher but nazism and other similar rules like the second largest genocide in modern history in Darfur, is by far the most deadly, inhumane, dehumanizing and dangerous in my opinion.

            • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 12/14/2007 7:58:12 AM

              Then you can't count on a third grade level. Chairman Mao killed more humans in a day then the entire population of Darfur. If you Euros want to save them stop asking Americans to clean up your filth. I suggest you re-arm the Germans and they will make quick work of it. They will then invade France Belgium Holland Norway Italy and Northern Africa

              • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/14/2007 7:24:54 PM

                Americans emit 100 tons of co2 per person and year compared to 6 tons by Swedes per person and year. I think the majority of the world just want you to clean up your own filth. I wouldn't dream that you would clean any better outside your nation, however of course communism with it's long history and and global spread has led to more deaths. You can buy African goods instead if you are truly angered by it. I am sure many Chinese have died while producing goods for the west too.

                • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 12/18/2007 10:34:44 AM

                  Your blowin C02 right now, hows about you hush up, your screwing up my opium plants!

              • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/14/2007 7:28:39 PM

                Why would I 're-arm Germans'? Your comments is really below criticism. Most of the weapons in Germany belong to the US.

        • Posted By: Wulfhart @ 12/15/2007 4:54:59 AM

          My favorite is the people who stand outside the grocery store trying to sell their food stamps to you. I wonder what they want to buy???? Not food obviously. Food stamps for sale $5 worth for only 3 dollars cash.

        • Posted By: angelus1967 @ 12/13/2007 12:51:22 PM

          Hell, I KNOW we're on the same page about THAT!! Nothing pissed me off more than the misuse of help that is being offered to someone. My wife and i got married and had kids very young and refused the handout but we had many people who lived close to us with much better life styles due to the government dole. Better homes, cars, clothes, more and better food, you name it.
          As I stated before, I believe we should offer people a hand-up not a hand-out, I know it's a cliche but when you put people on the lifelong dole they begin to expect it. There is a certain segment of our society that CAN"T do for themselves and never will be able to due to profound mental or physical disabilities and we should take care of them. The rest can work and make thier lives better at some point even in they need help for a while.

          You and i are not as far apart in ideology as I originally thought so I need to apologize for some of my statements.

          • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 12/13/2007 1:54:25 PM

            Not at all needed. Debate requires passion! Hopefully we can change the world for the better, and speaking our minds is a good begining.

    • Posted By: cagday @ 12/13/2007 12:56:23 PM

      William Demuth your ideas are twisted and illogical. If you read this article carefully it has nothing to do with money noone is asking for FREE food you idiot but of course you have your agenda to fulfill so as soon as a social commentary is made you jump on this old cliche Republican Conservative bandwagon and start blaming the misfortunite for all the problems in this society.. Give me a break. The concept of having healthy avaliable food for everyone is a great idea and will only make this country stronger and fincancially healthier in the long run. As a rich industrialized country like America the citizens have a responsiblity to make this avaliable to people that want it. I am not suggesting a hand out but helathy food should at least be avaliable for all citizens of this great country, there is not way it cant be done, resources are avaliable, And for everything big business takes from us they should be required by LAW thats right by LAW to make grocery stores avaliable with in a certian amount of miles of where people live. This is NOT socialism or fascism it is just GOOD business sesnse period. The less fat out of shape people in this country the stronger it will be and the less our hopsitals are taxed and the less we are taxed. These people would get thin and start contributing to society as well. All would benefit. ITs just narrow minded people like you that have grabbed all they can the hard way and dont want to let it go who are against something like this.

      • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 12/13/2007 1:51:56 PM

        If it was good business sense, why hasn't it happened? Your childish interpretation of good business is plainly evident. Americans would sell oil to an Arab if their was money in it. If you are too blind to see the underlying agenda then you are a fool. This is about the farm bill, and who will get the BILLIONS in the pot. You don't actually believe that anyone gives a damn about people eating Cheetos do you? They are expendable. The companies that make this crap are owned by the same people who eat it. If you want to make business sense of it, chain their fat rear ends to a network of treadmills and drop the cost of energy. You have not a clue about the cost your idea might entail, you are just blowing smoke. If you want them thin then less stores would be a more logical alternative than expecting business people to open stores for welfare recipients to receive more crap. Before you continue to sound like a fool, think for a second. Just how close would you LAW make these stores? Then do the math, if you can, and you will quickly realize what is and is not possible.

        • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/13/2007 9:46:31 PM

          It must be embarrassing to be the wealthiest nation in the world and not be able to feed the population. Forget the talk about how business wins over health...You can't eat money and dead or sick people don't pay taxes. I think LAWS logically would regulate the content of food. That way healthy food would be available everywhere. Aren't those 'American death on plates' the weapons of mass-destruction you've been looking for ;) Don't be cynics, saying that the only way is to let people destroy themselves, of course in this millenium there are simple, easy ways to fix problems. Of course LESS stores isn't the answer. Are you trying to kill your own people?

          • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 12/14/2007 8:33:21 AM

            I say we feed the poor the chepest meat we can get, Europeans!

            • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/14/2007 6:58:51 PM

              How about beans, peas and lentils? It's much cheaper, healthier and environmentally friendly than meat, plus guaranteed animal cruelty free. Buy/grow ecological ones and you further reduce environmental impact.

              • Posted By: Wulfhart @ 12/15/2007 5:05:44 AM

                Do you know how many animals/people die raising lentils. I am sure a lot. I know that wheat farmers routinely run over small animals living in the wheat fields. you can't miss them. Think about it if there is food animals such as birds and squirrles will live there. Birds and other animals eat lentils and beans. Only way to stop this kill them or trap them in "environmental" cages and dump them in the desert to survive.

              • Posted By: Wulfhart @ 12/15/2007 4:50:20 AM

                I prefer potatos, they have kept generations of my family alive.

      • Posted By: angelus1967 @ 12/13/2007 3:47:07 PM

        It would make no sense at all to require big businesses to open grocery stores within x miles of where people live if you are not going to subsidize a food give away! If there is no profit motive they could never stay open anyway so what good would it do?
        Talk about illogical.....

  • Posted By: Clarkitect @ 12/12/2007 11:47:06 AM

    Dear Mr.Demuth:
    You sound so threatened. Education is the key, but unfortunately our country is more interested in corporate welfare. Iraq is a perfect example--its nothing more than corporate welfare for the oil and related companies over there trying to get to the 2nd largest oil reserves in the world. So unfortunatley, our current admin. which I bet you support, doesnt give a damn about these people, nor do you near as I can tell.
    They don't threaten you with there ignorance, you threaten them with yours.

    • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 12/12/2007 12:06:55 PM

      I am not threatened, I live quite well. I merely hope a few might learn that the way to accomplish this is through self sufficiency, not dependency. As for our administration, they where put into power by those whom this article speaks of, and frankly I have been calling for a war crime tribunal into their acts. In my world I see those living in subways and cardboard boxes, but the plight is actually similar, and although I mourn for them, I can not save the world and neither can any of you. If you all provide for yourselves and stop think others should carry your burdens you might actually achieve the greatness within all of us.

      • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/17/2007 12:30:40 AM

        I think greatness is a little more than having a job.

      • Posted By: bandannaanna @ 12/12/2007 12:14:31 PM

        absolutely true

  • Posted By: bandannaanna @ 12/12/2007 12:11:42 PM

    The article states, "Fannie Charles, 46, lives six miles from the nearest grocery store in rural Orangeburg County, S.C. She doesn't own a car, so she pushes a cart along the side of the highway. (There are no sidewalks.) It's difficult, since she weighs 240 pounds and suffers from asthma and type 2 diabetes. That's why she usually goes only once a month." Ugh! What a mental image. Lady, get a car, get a job and go on a diet. It won't be easy but then again, that's life and anything worth having is worth working for.

    • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 12/12/2007 12:29:07 PM

      I like this person! Your insights make me believe America is not as doomed as some might say! Keep fighting the good fight, enjoy your life, and thank your parents for giving you an incredible advantage in life, common sense!

      • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 12/12/2007 12:42:03 PM

        domestic unions are nice, you two should try cause the one thing you two have in common is you really believe your better than all of us disabled, so you believe you should have the right to tell us, what to eat how to live, and remind us daily what a waste of time we are to your exsistence. A True American the two of you make, and finally one of you said something different besides posting the same dribble, shows intell,lol

        • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 12/12/2007 1:02:30 PM

          Son, I think it's time for your meds!

          • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 12/12/2007 1:09:16 PM

            if i were your son i would have hanged myself cause your so heartless how could you possibly love me!

            • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/17/2007 12:25:27 AM

              I want to say that I have reported him and will report the other abuser.

  • Posted By: jqeskimo @ 12/12/2007 12:33:55 PM

    I grew up in a rural area or we like to call it "the country". We lived about 45 minutes from the closest city and about 10 miles from the closest town. We didn't live on junk food and we shop in the closest quick stop. We had a garden and we usually slaughtered a cow for meat. We also drove to the closest grocery store and bought real food. Meat, vegetables, eggs, bread and milk. The woman says that it is stereotypical that everyone in rural areas lives on a farm. Well this article makes it sound like everyone who lives in the country is unhealthy, dirt poor, has no car and is severly over weight. This has nothing to do with living in the country. The title should be "Diets of the poor and or lazy". I am sure that you could do the same study in most cities and find the same results. If she thinks buying vegetables is too expensive, then she should buy some seeds for a few cents each, plant them and have her own vegetables. Planting a little garden is very little effort with a high yield. It's called "taking care of yourself". Give it a try.

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 12/12/2007 12:48:00 PM

      The title should be "Diets of the poor and or lazy". Your own words? Then keep your communistic views out of here cause this lady is neither she is disabled which makes her poor and type 2 makes her large and all this makes you a fool or a illegal or dead meat if found!. post different, the same junk over and over makes you look more uneducated than you ASSUME this woman is !!!

      • Posted By: CommonSense1 @ 12/12/2007 3:59:39 PM

        The fact that she is disabiled isn't reported in this story. It said that she has Type 2 diabetese - which is caused by being obese - not the other way around. I will never understand how obesity - which is almost always self-inflicted - can be considered a disese.

        • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/17/2007 12:15:05 AM

          I think you're right, obesity is not a disease, it's a symptom of a/ an interaction of problems.

  • Posted By: Turbojesse @ 12/14/2007 2:54:56 PM

    What a crock. None of these posts have anything to do with the article.

    The price of living as free people is that some will not be able to sustain or take care of themselves. And as usual there???s always someone willing to blame it all on Bush. The lack of supermarkets in rural areas is nothing new. It???s as it???s always been. There are numerous ways rural people deal with this from stiocking up on canned and preserved food, to private truck gardens, to farmers markets, to hunting and fishing and on and on. It???s not that these people have no healthy choices, they choose not to exercise their choice. And it???s not just rural poor people. Look around the next time you go to the mall. See how many middle class and upper middle class folks are waddling down the aisles. Lack of good food judgement is not reserved for poor people.

    • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/14/2007 6:08:36 PM

      It's not just lack of judgement I believe, rather it's the lack of availability. US food is the fattest in the world in my experience. Americans are the dirtiest people on the planet.

      • Posted By: Wulfhart @ 12/15/2007 4:13:57 AM

        Thankyou Bornita. I enjoy being called dirty. I would like you to know I shower daily and I am not dirty. You should try living off of 5.85 an hour. How much do you make? I could probably live for a year off of what you make in just one month.
        I have access to a grocery store and I eat "bad." I live off of Pizza and potatos. Only reason I get pizza is it is free from my work. I eat potatos because they don't go bad. I go to the store and I see chips for $2 a bag, hamburger, $3/lb, 1 lb bag lettuce for $5, and a 20 lb bag of potatos for $5 Logically I think chips won't keep me alive, steak will be gone in one meal, lettuce will spoil and mold within the week and it is only 1 lb, Potatos don't spoil and it is 20 pounds. I choose potatos

        I make $500 a month working 30hr weeks. I would work more, but I am a fulltime college student paying his own way. Thank God for scholarships. We should switch spots for a year. I would bet you would start crying after the first week without your environmentalist hybrid car, try bicycling as your only transportation. That trumps your car for the environment. Then bicycle home after work when it is raining and windy because that is the only way you are getting home. There is no bus in my town and there are no cabs.

        • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/16/2007 11:58:42 PM

          I apologise for being unclear. I mean Americans are the environmentally dirtiest people on the planet. Apart from that I find you to be very charming most of the time.

      • Posted By: Wulfhart @ 12/15/2007 4:08:47 AM

        Thankyou Bornita. I enjoy being called dirty. You should try living off of 5.85 an hour. I would like you to know I shower daily and I am not dirty. Half of what I make goes to rent the other half goes to college. How much do you make? I could probably live for a year off of what you make in just one month. I have access to a grocery store and I eat "bad."
        I live off of Pizza and potatos. Only reason I get pizza is it is free from my work. I eat potatos because they don't go bad. I go to the store and I see chips for $2 a bag, hamburger, $3/lb, 1 lb bag lettuce for $5, and a 20 lb bag of potatos for $5 Logically I think chips won't keep me alive, steak will be gone in one meal, lettuce will spoil and mold within the week and it is only 1 lb, Potatos don't spoil and it is 20 pounds. I choose potatos

        I make $500 a month working 30hr weeks. I would work more, but I am going to college right now. We should switch spots for a year. I would bet you would start crying after the first week without your environmental hybrid car, try bicycling as your only transportation. Then bicycle home after work when it is raining and windy because that is the only way you are getting home. There is no bus in my town and there are no cabs

    • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 12/14/2007 3:33:20 PM

      Cool! As a fat rich dude I have been concerned I wasn't getting enough credit!

  • Posted By: RalphParker22 @ 12/16/2007 2:00:06 AM

    folks in the north have a 3 month growing season. we can can and freeze, but then the fresh food is dead food. there is plenty of everything, but a lack of distribution and desire. don't get me going on how the oil prices have increased our food prices. here in maine, food pantries pay .16 per lb. for food from a centralized warehouse. produce, because it spoils, is free. it isn't unusual to watch people choose canned items and white bread while leaving the veggies and whole grain items. is it time to send packages home with school children?

  • Posted By: NBSanDiego @ 12/15/2007 10:35:42 PM

    andrea06debs says: "I have never seen anyone that did not have transportation to get to the store or the means to buy groceries for their family." Well, I have, and I've lived in rural Nebraska for the last fifteen years. All our national resources and attention, including secure remunerative jobs, have become concentrated in our urban centers. Eleven of the twenty poorest counties in America are rural counties in Nebraska and South Dakota, and as the mechanization of agriculture has pushed families off the land into towns where there is no work waiting, I have seen adults well into their fifties and later, pulling sixty-hour work weeks in demeaning entry level jobs, to provide their kids with subsistence lifestyles. Frankly, nothing in this article is unexpected to me; the only surprise was that a research institution spend money on something I could have told them for free.

  • Posted By: andrea06debs @ 12/15/2007 9:32:33 PM

    As an individual that lives in the "country" I have never seen anyone that did not have transportation to get to the store or the means to buy groceries for their family, however, I have seen that in the inner city! Nevertheless, I think this article is extremely slanted and only aids in the misinterpretation of country living.

  • Posted By: andrea06debs @ 12/15/2007 9:30:09 PM

    As an individual that lives in the "country," I have never seen someone that did not have transportation to get to the store or the means to do it; however, I have seen that in the inner cities! I think this article is extremely slanted and only aids in the misinterpretation of rural country living.

  • Posted By: eruditenihilist @ 12/15/2007 8:41:17 PM

    The claims of this article regarding the availability of nutritious food is pure exaggeration for the sake of sensationalism. I grew up Sumter, South Carolina, which neighbors Orangeburg county, and I always saw big grocery stores in even the smallest of towns. I lived in what was considered an undeveloped area outside of the city, and for me, it was only a five minute drive to a very large, newly built, grocery store that was full of every kind of healthy food imaginable. The only halfway valid point this author made was that not having a car is problematic. It is true that SC has extremely limited public transportation in its capital city, and none everywhere else, but owning a car is very cheap. I have seen old beater cars for sale starting at $500, and we did away with inspections, so basically anything is allowed on the road. Also, gasoline is much cheaper than in other places in the country. I just don't see the problems this article stated, and for that reason, I consider it completely bunk.

  • Posted By: urbanforager @ 12/15/2007 5:53:33 PM

    It's important to note that many people in rural areas may not have cars or access to a vehicle, so they cannot drive 2 hours to the nearest large grocery store to stock up on healthier foods. What can they do? Well, walk to the nearest convenience store, where yes, they should make healthier choices than a snickers bar, but still, canned beans and white bread are not going to satisfy a person's nutritional needs. This article is important in exposing the common misconception that convenience store food is the plight of the urban dweller. Having just spent the summer traveling through some of poorest rural areas in the United States, I learned a lot about the way people live, and so much of it has to do with what's available to them, both in terms of actual food resources and education. One of the saddest things that is happening in this country is that so much of the land is being used for cash crops, so of course, there's no plucking the apple from the tree, or getting the eggs from the hens. Instead, it's harvest the wheat, corn, tobacco, cotton, soy, etc., ship it off, and go get processed, preserved food at the nearest convenience store. The system needs to be reexamined before people get blamed for their own food choices causing their obesity. Obese people in these situations are starving...they are starving for nutrients, to which they are not given access.

  • Posted By: rancherwife @ 12/15/2007 4:37:11 PM

    I live in a very rural area. The nearest store is 15 minutes away, and everything there is so expensive (junkfood and healthy food) that I rarely shop there. Instead, I drive the two hours to a much cheaper and larger store to shop once or twice a month. It is soo much more expensive to buy chips and soda and pre-made food than fruits and veggies and a bag of flour. Stock up, buy things on sale, and just used to the fact that although an apple does not taste like a candy bar, it is much healthier and cheaper. Being obese has to do with each persons food choices, not with where they live. There are very few obese people here in my rural ranching low-income area. Maybe this "study" should broaden it's horizons and stop trying to find the why and how unhealthy people are that way. They choose not to be.

  • Posted By: lanina @ 12/15/2007 4:31:01 PM

    I used to live in a rural town when I was a child, and yes we did have a small convenience store that had just about everything that's junkie. Lucky for me, I didn't end up obese because of it, but there was definitely a possibility. If you live in a rural town without grocery stores nearby, it's a shame, and it's in these areas that people need to wake up and do something healthy for themselves. Whether it be planting a garden, or eating legumes. You can do it!

  • Posted By: lanina @ 12/15/2007 4:27:11 PM

    Yes, although there are many rural areas in the same situation, people need to wake up and do something about it! People are making the conscious choice to choose the high fat, unhealthy foods. People who allow themselves to become obese obivously don't care for their bodies enough to exercise and plant a vegetable garden. Snap out of the twinkie phase and start eating dried legumes!

  • Posted By: captterm @ 12/15/2007 4:25:08 PM

    I am building in a rural town out West and the situation there is exactly as depicted in the article. The convenience store is the only place to buy food for 50 miles. They only stock processed foods and high fat everything. I can't go in there and come out with ANYTHING that I would normally eat as "healthy". Just about everyone is poor, obese and uneducated about healthy food.

  • Posted By: travelerflor @ 12/15/2007 3:11:05 PM

    Let's start to teach America how to eat well cheaply. Rice bought by the pound goes a long way and,if it's brown rice ,has the added fiber kick. Dried legumes are cheap and nutricious. Powdered milk in the USA is almost always low or no fat and cheaper then fresh. She could post a note in the local fast food place and try to connect with someone going her way for a ride to either store. She could have a windowsill garden for sprouts and lettuces. She could make her own yogurt. In season local produce is usually not expensive. Eggs on sale can be frozen (out of the shell) But, there must be some programs to get info like this low income citizens.

  • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/14/2007 12:53:01 AM

    Short journeys like driving to the food store is very climate dirty. That is another problem of not having walking distance to your groceries store: Too much unnecessary pollution.

    • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 12/14/2007 9:10:11 AM

      Well if you are REALLY concerned about a dirty environment in your home country relax. Before your life is over we Americans will have cleaned the environment in Sweden quite well. We will accomplish this by melting the polar ice caps so the ocean washes your tiny country squeaky clean! It's the least we can do for our left wing former allies to the north. So I recommend you start building an ark with all the Falafel and Sushi it can carry. Bon Voyage Mon Amour!

      • Posted By: Bornita @ 12/14/2007 5:55:23 PM

        Well the polar ice cap in the north is already gone and you are almost 100% ignorant about the issue of climate change. Please educate yourself to avoid further public humiliation.

        • Posted By: Wulfhart @ 12/15/2007 4:22:27 AM

          Maybe in Sweden, but I have seen some recent photos of Alaska and Northern Canada and don't see any glaciers missing.

          • Posted By: btvsrcks @ 12/15/2007 3:05:52 PM

            Are you kidding me? There is a town in Alaska, heavily populated, that is almost completely washed away due to global warming. Pardon me, but your ignorance is showing.

  • Posted By: NikkiRose @ 12/15/2007 2:57:00 PM

    I cannot help but sense that this is fast food propaganda. First (decades ago), the processed food manufacturers convinced consumers that they were too busy to cook (even though statistics show that most people watch more TV now than ever, confirming that their days may not always be packed with mandatory obligations). Now, consumers are hearing that diet-related diseases are due to lack of availability and high costs of fresh produce (or ANY REAL food). While lack of access to real food is a reality in many urban and rural areas, what we have yet to see is real proof that real food costs more than a full day's worth of fast food -- processed sweets for breakfast, a burger, fries and soda for lunch, and a pizza and soda for dinner, for instance. And with a real dinner (a roast chicken, potatoes, carrots and head of broccoli, for instance), there may be leftovers for days to come, if cooks planned ahead. A pound of pasta with fresh tomatoes and other vegetables (and that leftover chicken and broccoli) is likely cheaper than a single serving of a burger or instant noodles every day. What we are not seeing is such reports is the high costs of treatment due to diet-related diseases. How do poverty-stricken citizens afford health care and medicine to treat these diet-related diseases? What we have yet to see is solutions, like local authorities pushing to open grocery stores. Or citizens creating demand -- pushing markets to sell more fresh produce. Or Community Supported Agriculture, where many people in the neighborhood can pitch in to get some fresh produce at a decent price. If diet-related diseases are truly and solely based on lack of access to real food, then consumers need to work on their own solutions and push local authorities and businesses to provide affordable access to the foods they desire.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse