SPONSORED BY:

NOT In Our Name

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

I have repeatedly stated my opposition to military action against Iran. There is no question that dialogue and diplomacy must be given time to take their course. But endless, futile negotiations cannot be a solution, either. The threat posed by those who have blackened the name of Islam and destroyed the prosperity of the Iranian nation can be countered only through what I have referred to as a "third way": the mobilization and the empowerment of the Iranian people.

While the present crisis has been focused mainly on Iran's nuclear ambitions, most Iranians hope the standoff will provide them with a chance to challenge and replace the despotic theocracy with a secular democracy.

Until freedom, democracy and human rights are fully respected and adhered to by a responsible government in Tehran that is committed to the welfare of its own people, peace and security in the Middle East and beyond will continue to remain in constant jeopardy.

Pahlavi is an opposition leader and the son of the last Shah of Iran.

© 2007

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: millywilly84 @ 12/28/2008 10:05:33 PM

    to nawawimohamad, by your name and yout comments you are obviously an Arab kronie who want nothing more thanto see Iran down...i can assure you that i agree with the comments that Iranians would welcome back our Shah with open arms, 2500 years of Imperial rule can not be ignored! and the Pahlavis were and are one of our greatest dynastys, one think the Pahlavis and other nationalists like Mossadegh had in commen is they ALL love Iran and its people, unlike the money hungrey, arab islamic government at the moment...who have more support in the arab countries than in their own, their time is numbered, and when we expell them there will be no place for this form of government in our history ever again, it is the 2nd time the arabs have infiltrated us, i promise you there wont be a third time! JAVID SHAH!

  • Posted By: milly84 @ 12/28/2008 10:03:56 PM

    to nawawimohamad, by your name and yout comments you are obviously an Arab kronie who want nothing more thanto see Iran down...i can assure you that i agree with the comments that Iranians would welcome back our Shah with open arms, 2500 years of Imperial rule can not be ignored! and the Pahlavis were and are one of our greatest dynastys, one think the Pahlavis and other nationalists like Mossadegh had in commen is they ALL love Iran and its people, unlike the money hungrey, arab islamic government at the moment...who have more support in the arab countries than in their own, their time is numbered, and when we expell them there will be no place for this form of government in our history ever again, it is the 2nd time the arabs have infiltrated us, i promise you there wont be a third time! JAVID SHAH!

  • Posted By: Hope4Change2008 @ 10/22/2008 1:02:33 PM

    I am an American married to an Iranian, so I visit there fairly often. What I want to say is that Iranians DO NOT hate American people and my overtures of friendship are always returned enthusiastically. The belief that Americans hold that Iranians are hateful toward them begets hate of Americans, and so on. What we have here is a failure to communicate, and to have a clue about each others culture and people.

    Many Iranians I have met are anxious to share with me how unhappy they are with the regime and about how they miss the Shah, pointing to the great things the Shah built or accomplished and how they were free citizens then. But America was saying just the opposite about the Shah at the time of the Revolution, and assisted greatly in the demise of his leadership. So why do Iranian citizens seem to think as an American that I understand their love of the Shah (even though I do?) And why is it that America, who helped the Islamic Republic come to rule, is so blatantly against the Republic?

    I believe that America had no business then or now interfering in the affairs of Iran. On that point, I agree with Ahmadinejad. America's interference is what I believe is really the cause of both the breakdown of diplomatic relations and also the "hate" of America. And if we are honest with ourselves, that interference hurt Iran terribly. I agree that the "third way" - to empower the people to revolt, is the only way.

    Neither my husband or I can fully fathom how it is the Shah's rule could have ended. To this day we visit his childhood home that the Republic took away after the Revolution. I asked why the Shah's descendants could not return to power if the people wanted. The fact is they do not have a voice...

    I am convinced of ulterior motives on the part of America not yet revealed. And I think the same of the Islamic Republic. My hope is that people striving to get the word out will educate Americans about the REAL Iranian people and despite political problems, Americans will understand and respect, and maybe like me, even love its people.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now