I would like to point out that purebreds are also available from shelters and rescues. (I'm going to again mention www.petfinder.com since it is one resource I'm aware of that has a good reputation and allows you to search by breed and geography.) There is nothing wrong with most purebreds in shelters and rescues -- many simply came from homes that were either unprepared for a dog, did not realize they would actually have to TRAIN it and that it would not intuitively know how it was expected to behave, were neglectful or abusive, moved to a place where they were not allowed to have dogs rather than making accomodations for the furry member of their family, etc. There are many reasons a dog is turned into a shelter, humane society, or rescue. It is only rarely "the dog's fault." And while young purebreds are available, adopting an older dog or a mixed breed is also a very rewarding experience. They are all equally deserving of homes, and older dogs and mixed breeds have their own benefits. (ie Older dogs may already be trained, have more personality, and may require a bit less activity. And mixed breeds may not suffer from genetic problems that can plague purebreds.)
And in response to the post below -- while I know the accusation was not directed at me, I'd like to say that my advocacy from homeless dogs does not come from me being a "radical" winger of either party. I'm just a moderate person, not originally much of an "animal person," who has had opportunity to work with and learn about homeless and helpless dogs that badly need and really deserve wonderful, loving homes, and I like to take every opportunity I can to encourage caring people to adopt these dogs and spay and neuter dogs they already own. Together, people who care can make a difference in the world.
Discuss