Courtesy THINKFilm
Under Siege: Nanking residents in 1937
MOVIES

Horrors of War

A new documentary harrowingly revisits the atrocities of Nanking. Why it should be mandatory viewing.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Japan's 1937 invasion of China's former capital, Nanking, is a chapter of history that the Japanese would prefer to forget. It remains a controversial subject in Japan, where many historians and officials deny the accounts of mass slaughter and rape told by Chinese survivors. But what makes the six-week siege unusual among 20th-century battles is that it was observed by a group of impartial Westerners whose notes, photographs and movie reels bear witness to the atrocities, which resulted in an estimated 200,000 deaths and 20,000 rapes.

A new documentary, "Nanking," depicts what is commonly known as the rape of the city using archival footage, survivor testimonies and staged readings from witnesses' letters and journals. It is 89 minutes of harrowing cinema that attests to the brutality of war coupled with the inexplicable courage of six Americans and one German who carved out a safety zone in Nanking, saving the lives of 250,000 Chinese. Released in New York on Dec. 13 to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the invasion, "Nanking" is not entertaining, it is not a feel-good film, and it is not advisable for children. But for anyone who thinks we need to learn the lessons of the 20th century so as to not repeat them in the 21st, "Nanking" is mandatory viewing.

Accounts of mass slaughter and rape were brought to the attention of the American public by Iris Chang, the Chinese-American writer of the 1997 book (previously excerpted in NEWSWEEK) "The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II." Tragically, Chang—who once worked as an intern at NEWSWEEK—committed suicide in 2005 at age 36. When Ted Leonsis, the vice chairman of AOL, happened upon her obituary, he felt compelled to produce a documentary to bring the truth of the Nanking siege to a wider audience. Leonsis hired documentarians Bill Guttentag and Dan Sturman (the duo behind the 2003 Oscar-winning short "Twin Towers"), who spent months compiling archival footage and speaking with historians, scholars and witnesses.

The film is anchored by a handful of Westerners who stayed behind in Nanking to set up the Safety Zone, a makeshift refugee camp inside the city walls of old Nanking. The Safety Zone committee members appealed to the Japanese for exemption from attack, and for the most part were left unharmed. Their observations, as recorded in journal entries and letters, were the basis of the script. One notable account was from Minnie Vautrin (Mariel Hemingway), the only woman in the group. She was a Christian missionary from Illinois who helped found the Ginling College for women in Nanking. She hung a massive American flag on campus to deter attacks by the Japanese and sheltered thousands of women from roving bands of soldiers who were raping and murdering preteen girls and elderly women alike. Bob Wilson (Woody Harrelson), a Harvard-trained doctor, was the only surgeon left in Nanking when the city fell to the Japanese. He treated hundreds of patients and helped document the atrocities committed against the thousands of civilians who were unable to reach the Safety Zone before the Japanese entered the city. Missionary John Magee (Hugo Armstrong) captured the harrowing footage of injured Chinese on his 16mm camera, which was later played for the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Ironically, the Safety Zone was spearheaded by a German Nazi Party member named John Rabe (Jürgen Prochnow), who had been working as a businessman in China for 27 years. He sheltered 650 Chinese on his estate in the zone, and after the siege sent a copy of McGee's film to Hitler, believing that he would put an end to the atrocities perpetrated against the Chinese. Instead he was arrested by the Gestapo and commanded to stop speaking of the Nanking massacre. Later in life Rabe became destitute, and the mayor of Nanking took up a collection, which provided Rabe with enough money to live on until his death.

John Magee says that he did not film the evidence of the Nanking massacre to stir up hatred against the Japanese but "to make all people realize how horrible war is." Let's hope that the movie "Nanking" has the same effect.

© 2007

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Lilly @ 12/26/2007 4:55:46 AM

    There is no doubt that the American government knew of this impending slaughter before it happened - and no doubt they knew when it was taking place and did nothing. The US knew the Nazi policy of eradicating Jews and other undesirables well before the discovery of the camps by US forces - but did nothing. The same can be said of Rwanda nearly 60 years later. Bottom line is that without a vested US interest - there is no movement on our part to halt this kind of aggression towards innocent civilian populations.

  • Posted By: saugusboy @ 12/17/2007 4:34:53 AM

    Funny, my father and uncles were not ignorant of this atrosity in the late 1930s and early-40s. The newsreels they watched at the movies showed Americans across the nation exactly what kind of barbaric people the Japanese sildiers were- bayoneting and decapitating men, women, and children alike. Studies have shown that the American soldiers that fought in the Pacific had much more hatred than thier European theater brothers, and this, plus the "dirty" sneak attack were the main reasons why. You hear nonsense now about it being because of their race, It wasn't, and. In fact, before anyone brings up Hiroshima and Nagasaki, please remember the Atomic Bomb was origianlly to be used against the Germans. No, we knew what evil was going on and couldn't do anything about it at the time. If you want to talk about indifference, talk to the Japanese, who still honor these soldiers and their leaders as heroes and glorify them at the Shinto shrine in Tokyo each year, as well as watering down their textbooks to show that Japan did these things in China and Korea to unite the Asian race. Now, they try in every way to avoid taking any blame-- So, whose ignorant?..

  • Posted By: observer101 @ 12/16/2007 2:06:50 PM

    War is War no matter what country or time period it takes place. It always has its evils that seem to grow and and get out of control the longer it wears on. All people of all religions and races have been tortured , raped , or killed. It makes no sense to say which people had it worse in which war. It all sucks but unfortunately its human nature.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse