To equate swingers with pedophiles like the man in the article did is absurd. There is a big difference berween a sexual predator who preys on young innocent children and two or more consenting adults who decide to have non-conformist sex. It is also absurd to say that a community can deny a busniess or club or a private citizens private party. I seem to remeber sevral communities who decided not to let blacks and hispanics and other minorities in their town; which was later determined to be illegal. To say a community is the law about what happens in it is crazy. If I want to have sex with five people fine its my right, just as it is right to not have sex with anyone. We are not a communist or socialist state, we are a democratic republic. The government be it federal, state, or local has no right to determine what we do in our homes, obviuosly our action s must be legal though. Also comparing a group of consenting adults who party at one another's house to a strip club is outrageous. They are not a strip club, they are not a brothel, they are not a club, they are not a business. They are private citizens on private property behind private walls doing private things in a group setting. As they stated if they were having a super bowl party no one would care. To justify blatant persecution under the veneer of "majority rule" did not work for racism or religous persecution and it should not work for sexual persecution.









Discuss