Quantcast
 
 
 

LIVING POLITICS

Howard Fineman

Charles Ommanney / Getty Images for Newsweek
Pander-rama: Giuliani is playing defense on immigration

I’m More Anti-Illegals!

GOP voters focus on who's coming into America.

Dec 24, 2007 Issue

In normal times, Steve King is an obscure figure—a low-ranking Republican congressman from rural western Iowa. But these aren't normal times: Iowa's caucuses are almost here. So King suddenly is a kingmaker and symbol of his party's growing—and politically risky—obsession with immigration, which is now the top concern among likely GOP voters in Iowa and No. 2 in New Hampshire and South Carolina. King favors deporting the nation's estimated 12 million illegals, and he is surveying the field for a nationally salable soulmate. "This is my 'destiny setter' issue," he told me. He plans to set up shop in a Des Moines hotel lobby until caucus night "so I can talk about this to everyone."

Heading into what could be a series of photo finishes, Republican candidates are trampling each other as they race toward the Kings of the party. The latest is Rudy Giuliani, who has the most distance to cover. As New York mayor, he ran what was widely considered a sanctuary city for illegals. Now he's airing a TV ad that applies his tough-guy persona to the issue (though he doesn't call for deportation). In an interview with author Bill Sammon, Giuliani suggested he wanted to deport the city's 400,000 illegals, but couldn't because the Clinton administration wouldn't go along. Giuliani's foes note he sued the administration to preserve benefits for illegals.

While Giuliani plays defense, Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee are attacking each other. As Massachusetts governor, Romney took some restrictive stands (no driver's licenses for illegals or in-state tuition assistance, for example). Now he aims to burst the Huckabubble in a new ad that points out that the former Arkansas governor once favored giving college scholarships to illegals. (Fred Thompson jumped in as well with a slick mail piece poking fun at "Huckabee U.") Eager to protect his lead in Iowa, Huckabee answered with a "secure America plan." The main feature: a 120-day "window" during which all illegals must "register … and leave the country" and get in line to come back. King remains suspicious, but he's impressed by the effort: "People are beginning to see how important this is."

Democratic strategists enjoy the "pander-rama." They think the general election can be won in the Southwest, where the ranks of Hispanic voters are swelling. They also think the angry tone of the GOP debate will turn off suburbanites, who think of themselves as tolerant and who like the cheap labor. "The Republicans are at such a low point that all they can do is speak to the fears of their base," says Simon Rosenberg of the New Democrat Network. Polls consistently show most voters favor a package deal, like the one Congress considered, which would toughen border security, weed out criminals, amp up employee ID requirements, require English-language proficiency and offer a "path to citizenship."

But Democrats need to be careful what they wish for. As the economy weakens, the immigration issue could hurt them. "The Washington establishment has no idea what is about to hit them," says Laura Ingraham, the conservative radio host. Without a package deal in Congress to protect them, Democrats are vulnerable to attacks on proposals like driver's licenses for illegals. Polls show voters oppose it, 31. New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer was forced to retreat from the idea, as was Hillary Clinton. Barack Obama is all for it. If he's the nominee, you'll hear a lot more about it—and not just from Steve King in Iowa.

© 2007

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: barkway @ 01/01/2008 2:07:17 AM

    Comment: I'd like to know what any state or state Party leader is doing to PREVENT illegals from VOTING. I too think the southwest could tilt the general election adn everyone with half a brain cell knows that illegals DO vote (despite tax clerk protestations to the contrary). Can anyone PROVE they don't? People in states with lots of them KNOW they DO (and to challenge their vote individually, you must have some kind of proof as to why they should not be allowed to cast their vote. Try saying "because I think they're illegal" and see how far that gets you). First there was multiple voting, then dead people voting, then legitimate eligible voters being prevented from voting, not to mention fraud from voting machines, now we have illegals voting! Welcome to the New America!

  • Posted By: Johnny1967 @ 12/30/2007 10:11:14 PM

    Comment: George Bush???s argument that we need the immigrants to do work that mainstream Americans won???t has a very important point in our national security, and maintaining soldiers in our military. The recent wars (Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.) have increased the likelihood of a soldier going to war. Economics 101, and common sense, informs us that those entering the military service will demand higher wages to offset the increase risk of dying or being injured. Not only wages, but other costs such as health insurance, post-war care, retirement, etc. In other words, with the current military pay and benefits, we will not have sufficient number of soldiers to fight our wars.

    To alleviate the short-fall of military soldiers, we could pay more to our soldiers. However, that means increased federal spending (and deficit). It would also mean pulling human resources from our private sector to the military. Its just not economically efficient.

    If the United States is not able to supply its military (or its not cost effective to do so) with people within the United States, we must rely more on friendly foreign governments supply the manpower. That means building up armies in Pakistan, Iraq, Japan, Korea, China, whomever we believe is our friends today. It???s very similar to outsourcing our military to attain lower labor costs. But outsourcing national security is a dangerous thing.

    Arguably, having a larger immigrant pool, which will likely be in the lower economic class, will alleviate the shortfall in our military soldiers and provide a strong military within the United States.

  • Posted By: WARLOCK @ 12/26/2007 11:11:22 PM

    Comment: It's hard not impossible. I agree the system needs to be changed, but in no way should it benefit those who come here ILLEGALLY!

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Speedo's new and controversial high-tech LZR suit is helping swimmers smash dozens of records. How the company plans to capitalize on Olympic gold.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
AFRICA

These are among the ruling party's weapons against opposition voters. Still, the population clearly didn't cooperate in Friday's vote.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu