SPONSORED BY:
CAPITAL SOURCES

Arctic Meltdown

The ice cap is thinning at a scary rate. What can be done?

Uriel Sinai / Getty Images
The sun sets over an iceberg near the town of Ilulissat, Greenland.
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Sledding at the North Pole isn't likely to be an option much longer. The ice cap is thinning, glaciers are melting, and the process seems to be accelerating. In 2005 scientists of the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment team, led by Robert Corell, predicted that the Arctic ice sheets would be gone by the end of the century. At the time some critics charged that Corell and his team were alarmist. But since then scientific predictions have grown more dire. What can the world do to slow or stop the process? Delegates from 187 countries reached agreement in Bali last week to begin two years of intense negotiations on a new climate treaty, but the talks produced no concrete targets for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Corell, director of the Climate Change Program at the H. John Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization in Washington, D.C., believes greater urgency is needed. He spoke to NEWSWEEK's Jeffrey Bartholet. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: When did you first go to the Arctic, and what did it look like then?
Robert Corell: I started going to the Arctic in the late '60s, when we were starting to ask questions about climate change in high-latitude areas. We were coring beneath the sea ice to obtain a long-term climate record. At that stage we were not aware that there were likely to be the big changes we see today. We were taking sediment cores beneath the ice to document the climate record for much of the past million years. I've been going back ever since.

How has it changed since then, just in terms of what you see when you go there?
In the '70s I was going to Greenland and places across the Arctic region, but there was no substantial evidence of melting at that time. I was there for four months on one trip, and we never saw any melting of the Greenland ice sheet. We might have seen a little mushiness here and there, but not any serious melting. We had two C-130 aircraft and flew all over. The difference between then and now is incredible. Now, if you fly all along the coasts of Greenland, there's lots of blue melt water, with rivulets of water going into the moulins [wide holes in the ice], draining down. It's really dramatic.

You've said you can actually see the glaciers slipping into the sea "like toothpaste squeezing from a tube." How fast are they moving?
The Ilulissat Glacier is "oozing like toothpaste" from the Greenland glacial ice sheet at a rate of about 15 kilometers per year. At that rate the front of the glacier is calving about two meters an hour. The melt water of this one glacier over one day would supply the water needs of a large city like New York or London for a whole year.

If current trends continue, when do you expect the North Pole to be marked by a buoy?
A scientific paper by Dr. Jay Zwally at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, published only a few days ago, suggests that not only is the aerial extent shrinking, but also the ice is thinning much more rapidly than we had previously thought. He's suggesting that the Arctic oceanic ice sheets will likely be gone [in the summer] somewhere between 2012 and 2015. Other scientists are projecting [that this will happen] between 2020 and 2030. But it's increasingly clear that on the current trajectory, we're going to have an ice-free Arctic in the summertime within a decade or two.

The predictions have been getting more dire by the year. In 2004 a panel of eminent scientists—yourself included—warned that the Arctic ice cap could be gone by the end of the century. And then a year later, in '05, the prediction was midcentury. Then a report issued by the U.N.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) earlier this year made new predictions that were even more dire, which have since been overtaken again with new reports that melting accelerated again this summer. What's going on?
It's happening so rapidly that we just haven't been able to get all the experimental data and papers out fast enough to track reality. My own opinion is that the feedback mechanisms in the Arctic are accelerating. For example, ice is a mirror to the sun and reflects almost all the sun's energy back into space. When it melts, it is replaced by water—which looks like a black-body radiator, which absorbs 80 percent of the sun's energy. So as the ice gets smaller, there's this feedback process that's accelerating. A good way to think about it is this: In 2005 the area of sea-ice melt in the Arctic Ocean equaled about the size of the eastern United States, from Ohio east. By 2007, that area of sea-ice melt was already equivalent to the eastern U.S. out to Kansas and the Dakotas. That's a huge amount of ice that's being melted. The amount of sea ice left now in the summer months is half of what it was in 1979.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: missrose2008 @ 01/03/2008 1:29:19 PM

    Although there is more than ample fingers to point the blame...All people need to be concern about one another and figure out together how to get to the next level...
    I know that only the people who believe in the brighter tomorrow get to see it. So are you going to point fingers or do something about it. For our children's sake please let's save the planet, our world, our mother earth, our gift to the future...Bless you all

  • Posted By: Starlady @ 12/22/2007 1:08:15 PM

    Global warming is created mainly by the HAARP radio frequencies. This was demonstrated by an inventor who showed how cetrain frequency applied to salt water created heat and therefore free energy. The downside is HAARP frequencies on the ocean cause ice meltdown...get it.

  • Posted By: Froggie76 @ 12/22/2007 4:42:43 AM

    Who is that Jasque Cheraque you are babbling about ? If you are thinking about the former French president, then spell it correctly at least: Jacques Chirac. And no he didn't believe in the UN as a world government body, but as a forum for world management.
    He was, and is still, very much a proponent of country sovereignty, rather than a world federalist.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now