RESIDENT EXPERT
Daniel McGinn
When Mortgages Made Sense
Should we go back to using the old-fashioned rules for lending?
When Stanley Greenstein graduated from college, he dreamed of working in the advertising industry. But Madison Avenue wouldn't hire him. So the Bronx native placed a "Situations Wanted" ad in The New York Times. A mortgage company called, and in 1952 Greenstein took a job helping people borrow money to buy homes. Now, a few months shy of 80 years old, he still works full-time financing real-estate deals.
After a career that has spanned nearly enough time to repay back-to-back thirty-year mortgages, Greenstein has seen a lot of change. And with the mortgage industry facing a new crisis as subprime mortgages default and foreclosure rates climb, that gives him a unique perspective on today's troubles—and the reforms that might help avert future problems.
In fact, many things Greenstein did as standard practice when he processed loans are likely to become more common. Today the Federal Reserve is announcing lending reforms that will, among other things, put an end to mortgages made without verifying the borrower's income and require lenders to ensure that a borrower will be able to afford the payment on an adjustable-rate mortgage after it resets, instead of simply qualifying him at the introductory "teaser" rate. The Fed's proposal will also likely limit lenders' ability to use prepayment penalties to discourage refinancing, call for better disclosures on the true costs of the home payment (including property taxes and insurance) and require better disclosures on mortgage brokers' fees. The new rules could go into effect next year.
In a way, such reforms are a return to a simpler time. When Greenstein began processing mortgage applications in the 1950s, many of the homes his clients were buying—which looked much like those in nearby Levittown, America's original postwar subdivision—cost less than $20,000. "We did literally thousands of them," he says.
The mortgages he was writing were themselves a response to the last great mortgage-industry crisis. Before the 1930s, many home loans lasted only five years, with borrowers required to make a large "balloon" payment at the end of the term. Homeowners with these loans faced big trouble during the Great Depression, so lending practices changed. Longer-term mortgages (usually 20, 25 or 30 years) became standard, and balloon payments became the exception rather than the norm. There were other changes beyond the term of the loan. Most important, the government stepped in, creating the Federal Housing Administration to provide guarantees to lenders that loans would be repaid. For Americans who had served in the military, the Veterans Administration offered their own loan programs.
During the 1950s and 1960s, Greenstein put borrowers almost exclusively into these FHA and VA loans. They carried a fixed-rate of interest—usually 4 or 4.5 percent. Every borrower underwent a thorough credit check (a laborious process in the days before computers and lightning-fast online approvals). Like all lenders, Greenstein relied on strict ratios to determine how much money someone could afford to borrow. A person's mortgage payment (including taxes and property insurance) couldn't exceed 28 percent of his monthly income. When you added together the family's car loan and the mortgage payment, the total should be below 36 percent of income. "It wasn't set in stone at 28/36; you could make judgment calls," he says, but most borrowers were held to those limits. What about credit card payments? That was rarely an issue, since credit cards didn't start catching on until the late 1950s. "It used to be a very simple business," Greenstein says.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: sksforchange @ 12/26/2007 4:27:01 PM
Comment: When I started in the mortgage industry 16 years ago, there was no automated underwriting systems! We did not have the MTA's, stated no income no asset loans. Credit Scores were not even a factor yet. We actually had to use our brains to put a loan together. It amazes me what has transpired and part of me feels like I have wasted all of these years. "Greed" has played a very large part in what has happened in our industry! I personally watched upper management get richer and richer! Their influence certainly did not help the situation. There are still some of us left that truly are in this business to make a difference! And yes most of our consumers do not have the financial savvy to know what they are getting into. Its a loan officers job to properly explain the procedure. To give them that warm and fuzzy feeling! Unfortunately, with the programs and products out their, the income potential a loan officer has, they just sell the most expensive loan they can with the most amount of premium in the rate. I posted here today to basically say, not all of us are greedy lenders, some of us actually love what we do and wish that things would get tightened up a bit. Those who truly are good at their jobs will make it through! Since 2006, 210 mortgage lenders have shut their doors! There will be many more to come and those who survive, hopefully will be the companies, the consumer can go to and get the TLC they deserve!
Posted By: besposlen @ 12/20/2007 12:51:03 PM
Comment: The problem with buying houses for most of the Americans really is similar to their eating practices. Americans eat too much, and Americans also want huge houses. And the market and the builders follow that, adding some extra (for the extra cost, of course).
In my family there are only three of us (parents with one child), so we don???t need a lot of space, especially since we were used to European standards. :) But, when we started looking to buy a house in the USA, we were very disappointed to find out that in new construction or in newer nice suburbs, only huge (2000 square feet and up) houses were available. It???s not that we could not afford that much, but it???s just a waste of money and a huge impact on the environment (think of all extra heating and cooling). We were fortunate to eventually find a nice new house of about 1400 sq.ft., but now it looks like we???ll have to move to a different state (job related), and I???m afraid we???ll have the same problem again.
Posted By: www.maxhouse.com @ 12/19/2007 6:09:20 PM
Comment: The real problem is that most consumers don't have the financial savvy to know that they are being robbed by the mortgage companies. Even with a low 30 yr fixed rate, they will pay for the house 2 or 3 times in interest. We should be utilizing Mortgage Checking Accounts like Australians have been using for almost 20 years. Aussies save over $100,000 in mortgage interest and pay their homes off in 7-10 years by simply combining their checking accounts with their mortgage accounts. This would not only save new homebuyers, but many of those who are at risk of losing them in the next few years.