Getting WMD Under Wraps | Newsweek Issues 2008

Posted By: ginopi @ 01/05/2008 5:51:29 AM

Comment: This article could have been written by any of the psycho fascists at Project for a New American Century ( Google it and read the names of the members at the bottom of the documents who signed their names, look at the dates, and realize who planned to put us in Iraq long before 9-11). (Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush, Jon Bolton, etc) Now that they're plan of domination and changing other countries by force and by saturating with weapons has backfired around the globe we have to read the same crap from an uninformed , corporate guinea pig journalist. Your subtitle: " Sadam is gone but........" are you an idiot? Where have you been for the last four years? Sadam was never a threat, he had no weapons of mass destruction, it's been proven!!!!! Damn. Where are all the real journalists gone?

Posted By: Emvee Kaz @ 01/03/2008 9:48:49 AM

Comment: I am constantly amazed that discussions on the non-proliferation of nuclear materials and weapons only focuses on countries other than the US. This is an example of closed thinking. "If you and you and you do not have weapons, then the world will be a safer place. Of course, I have those kind of weapons, but you know, I am good, and will never use them. You can see from the history of the world during the past 60 to 70 years that this is true.".

Are the other countries of the world led by fools who do not know where their self-interests lie? The policy of "do as I say and not as I do" is highly unlikely to be supported by regimes of other countries regardless of their political affiliations and whether they happen to be dictatorial or democratic.

When will the US and its political pundits realize that the biggest cause of world disharmony and the threat of world-wide war resides right here in the US?

We need to show the world that we believe in a peaceful coexistence of all countries and work for peace by leading the way, by shunning the continued development of weapons of mass destruction, and by relinquishing the role of governing other nations remotely.

Posted By: easym1 @ 12/23/2007 7:13:27 AM

Comment: the greatest problem america has today is G.W.B. if we got rid of him mabey we could settle back to being the country we all loved.it doesnt make any difference who we elect ,big business will buy them.why do you think they teach political science in college?

Posted By: CCEd @ 12/21/2007 2:41:57 AM

Comment: What country would send its Uranium ore out of the country to be turned into nuclear fuel -- And even if they agreed to do that they would be at the mercy of that entity to deliver the fuel as agreed. It is EASY to see one country withholding shipment of critical nuclear fuel as some kind of sanction over a disagreement.

Talk about 'nuclear blackmail' a countries ENTIRE power supply could be shut down by withholding or restricting the shipment of fuel.

Russia already did this once to Iran. These people think we are idiots to buy in to this kind of outright idiocy..... or perhaps they are simply idiots themselves... Either way we need different people in Washington deciding on these kinds of issues.

Posted By: hypnotoad3000 @ 12/20/2007 8:40:31 PM

Comment: New book shows Saddam did support al Qaeda and the Taliban using translated Iraqi documents:
'Both In One Trench: Saddam's Secret Terror Documents'
http://www.bothinonetrench.com/index2.html