Hillary’s Hidden Hand

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: understanding @ 12/25/2007 12:29:15 PM

    Let's take a moment to view some of the "Thank You"s" the Clintons's surely deserve, for the past is a true view of the future! Do you remeber the White House silverware, the beautiful china, the linen, towels ash trays, soaps, pens, magnetic copasses, flight manuals that were taken from Airforce 1? The saving costs from all that extra weight on the plane must be saving a bundle in fuel costs .
    Thank you Clintons for teaching my 7 year old about oral sex; I had really planned to wait until he was older to discuss it with him!
    Thanks for the 140 pardons of convicted felons in exile. We really enjoy seeing them back in society.
    And the most important one... Thanks so much for forcing Israel to let Mohammad Atta go free. Terrorist pilot Mohammad blew up a bus in Israel in 1986. The Israelis captured, tried and imprisoned him. As a part of the Oslo so called "Political Prisoners". However, the Israelis would not release any with blood on their hands. The American President at the time, Bill Clinton, and his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, "Insisted" that all prisoners be released. Thus Mohammad Atta was freed and eventually thanked the U.S. by flying an airplane into Tower One of the World Trade Center. This was reported by many American TV networks at the time the terrorists were first identified and I did witness it. It was censored in the U.S. from all later reports. Why shouldn't Americans know the real truth??? The tip of the iceberg this is. DO YOU WANT MORE OF THIS?

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 12/25/2007 1:20:46 PM

      WHEN WERE YOU GOING TO EXPLAIN WAR TO HIM WHEN HE IS DRAFTED TO IRAQ CAUSE WE CANNOT CONTROL WHERE WE DON'T EVER WANT TO LIVE!
      w. WE
      A. ARE
      R. RIGHT
      NOT ANY MORE! THE WORLD HAS EVOLVED BEYOND WAR! WE HAVE NOT AND AS LONG AS ITS PROFITABLE TO ANYONE NOT IN AMERICA ,WE WILL NEVER LEARN AS GREED FUELS THIS COUNTRY TODAY

      • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 12/25/2007 1:38:24 PM

        THIS, BY THIS, YOU MEAN NOT GOING AFTER THE PEOPLE RESPONABLE FOR THE WTC IE: SAUDI, AS PER YOUR REPORT ISRAEL AND OSAMA-BIN-WHO? NO, I WANT THESE RESPONABLE COUNTRIES TO PAY!! NOT COUNTRIES THAT ARE EASY TO INVADE AND HAD NO PART IN THE WTC? TO BAD TODAY WE CANOT EVEN GO AFTER THEM EITHER! WE ARE BROKE, FLAT BROKE, AND OUR DEBT, BUSH CREATED, WAS BOUGHT BY CHINA CAUSE CLINTON LEFT US DEBT FREE AND AS SUCH THE GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WHO LED BY EXAMPLE NOT BY NUCLEAR THREAT AS THE BAD GUYS LAUGH AT US FROM A DIFFERENT COUNTRY! THANKS BOTH BUSHS AND REAGAN WHO I FORGOT ABOUT. THE IRAN-CONTRA SCANDLE NEVER BROUGHT FORTH DUE TO LACK OF MEMORY AND ORDERS RECIEVED BY WHO ELSE BUT OLIVER NORTH THE IRAQ REPORTER FOR FOX-GO FIGURE, TO BAD IT WAS FOR REAL CALLED OPERATION CYCLONE FROM 79-89 15-20 MILES NORTH OF KABUL WE ONLY TRAINED 100,000+ INSURGENTS AS THEY ARE CALLED TODAY. CLINTON HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH ATTA BUT THE FRIENDSHIP BETWEEN THE BIN-LAUDENS AND THE BUSHS IS VERY WELL DOCUMENTED FOR MORE THAN 20 YEARS, BOTH ARE QUILTY, ONE FAR MORE THAN THE OTHER AND GUESS WHO, 20 YEARS BETWEEN THE TWO.

  • Posted By: Political_Sage @ 12/23/2007 3:01:46 AM

    This article can be read in two ways, either Bill Clinton was a battered husband or the biographer got sold a bill of crock by the Clinton Machine. Is there a way to verify all these claims through the white house archives before the Iowa Caucus.????

    • Posted By: evrm4 @ 12/25/2007 1:24:51 PM

      Exactly - NONE of this is immediately verifiable, and if it were true, why hasn't it come out before? I mean, how many years has it been since the Bill Clinton presidency and how many books and articles have been written about his presidency? And NONE of them mention these things? Yet, DAYS before the Iowa caucus, when Hillary is low in the polls, we get a "late-breaking" story about things that happened over a decade ago? And we're supposed to blindly believe this?
      These people will stop at NOTHING to gain power and are just as power-hungry, if not more, as those on the Republican side that they vilify. Anyone BUT Clinton in 2008!

  • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 12/25/2007 1:23:43 PM

    I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT THE ARTICLE. A CLINTON HAS THE PROPER FORMULA TO DO WHAT THEY ALREADY DID-PAY OFF OUR DEFICIT, NOT SELL US TO CHINA AS BUSH HAS. IF OLD LADY CLINTON OR OBAMA OR BETTER YET EDWARDS IS THE DEM PICK! JUST VOTE TO TAKE BACK WHAT IS OURS-THIS COUNTRY, AND THE GOP HAS IT FOR SALE! GET THE POINT YET

  • Posted By: sparky716 @ 12/25/2007 1:21:45 PM

    Boy are the repugs afraid of Hillary.....if Bill could run he would be elected by a landslide...oh yes where is osama bin laden...if we had spent as much time money and man power looking for him we would have him by now but no bush had to get the man who tryed to kill his dad...good ole smart bush had to fight a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 i think at least 15 of them were from saudi arabia but we could not attack them now could we they have all the oil and big oil and big business would not stand for that bush and dick are all for every one fighting but them...they chicken hawks I was in the US NAVY from 1963 to 1967...where were they, one hiding in alabama and the other to busy to serve...but they have no problems with your sons and daughters fighting...we need a real president not one picked by the supreme court 2000 or diebel 2004....

  • Posted By: AlwaysforHillary @ 12/25/2007 1:15:58 PM

    Thanks to this author for PROVING that HILLARY CLINTON IS THE MOST EXPERIENCED, QUALIFIED AND INTELLIGENT OF ALL THE CANDIDATES RUNNING!!!

    iF she can sustain the daily grind of a TWO-YEAR campaign, she certainly can handle ANYTHING that comes up in the presidency!!! I would bet my last dollar on this woman!! She is a fighter; she is strong and tough!! YET, if you have met her in person, you know she is also warm, friendly and compassionate!!! I truly admire her and I truly love her, too!

  • Posted By: are you kidding me @ 12/25/2007 12:18:29 PM

    Just so we're clear.....she's qualified because she possesses the ability to lie, cheat and manipulate (even her husband) in order to obtain illegitimate power at the expense of law abiding and decent public servants. She refuses to tell the truth, EVEN UNDER OATH, and has such a low sense of self that she chooses to stay married to a man who has, on multiple occasions, shown a complete disrespect for the sanctity of marriage, commitment and respect for his "life partner". She hitched her wagon to a guy she viewed as "followable" and has been "following" ever since. She has never led even a cub scout troop!!! When placed (as a result of her husband's position) in a seat of power, she has consistently abused and illegally manipulated law abiding public servants....costing many of them their jobs!!! Regardless of her gender, this is NOT the kind of person I want my daughter to view as a shining example. There are soooo many women in this country who are more intelligent, with more integrity and who are more deserving than this power hungry "user of the little people". Regardless of your party affiliation, find another candidate !!! The last thing we need is a couple in the White House whose relationship is dictated by betrayal, anger, manipulation, revenge and dishonesty at the expense of anyone who is viewed as an obstacle to gaining corrupt power. I think the American public deserves better.

    By the way.....How many times did it take for the most intelligent woman in the world to pass even one bar exam????

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 12/25/2007 1:12:43 PM

      BOY YOU GOT BUSH DOWN PAT USING THE CLINTON NAME

  • Posted By: are you kidding me @ 12/25/2007 1:03:23 PM

    Some things are so predictable.......People !!!!! She is NOT running against Bush OR Chaney !!!! Regardless of what you think of the current president, we are talking about the NEXT ONE. If this is the best the Democrats can offer, then something is REALLY wrong with the party. You people don't get Bill again if you elect her.....HELL, if you believe the article, you didn't really have him the first time either. There must be at least ONE more qualified woman in your party......no, really.....there must be.......and if there isn't, well......you've got bigger problems than you're willing to admit.

  • Posted By: bg in nyc @ 12/25/2007 12:56:38 PM

    Assuming the accuracy of her statements concerning her role in the White House, it should be concluded that de jure election of Senator Clinton will be tantamount to the creation of a defacto monarchy in te U.S.A.

    If Senator Clinton cares as much for the welfare of this country as she professes pub;lcally, then she should withdraw from the Presidential race and go back to representing the great state of New York. as its dulyl elected U.S. Senator.

  • Posted By: haroldwolf @ 12/25/2007 12:33:12 PM

    Hmmm, I am the wife of a governor and president so now I am qualified? I don't like the sound of a wife helping to set national policy. That should be reserved for an individual who has been either elected or though the appointment process. All in all I am still not convinced she is more experienced than Senator Obama or any of the other candidates. She is, after all, the JUNIOR Senator from New York.

  • Posted By: haroldwolf @ 12/25/2007 12:29:33 PM

    I don't like the sound of a person who had not been either elected or through an appointment review helping to set national policy. I am not sure that the level of experience described in the article is significantly better than Senator Obama or the other candidates.

  • Posted By: Johnny1967 @ 12/24/2007 6:47:28 PM

    There is a clear line between appropriate influence and inappropriate influence the first lady should have over the President. The point is not whether Hillary Clinton is intelligent or has good ideas because there are many smart people with good ideas. If Hillary Clinton were exerting such influence, then the public should expect President Bill Clinton to take measures to remove such influence. Furthermore, such influence would be a breach of trust because when the nation elects a President, most people would not expect his or her spouse, or any other person (mother, father, girlfriend, boyfriend, mistress, brother, sister, church leader, lobbyist, etc), having such influence on policy decisions. If the article were true, it would be extremely disturbing.

    • Posted By: sparky716 @ 12/25/2007 12:28:36 PM

      i think nancy checked the stars before regan made any decisions did that bother you?

  • Posted By: HellNoHillary @ 12/25/2007 12:04:09 PM

    Good old Newsweek to come to the _itches defense. It's the very reason I dropped this publication like a hot potato. Newsweek sees her dropping in the polls and WALLA! The greatest thing since sliced bread. The American public, except for a few idiots, see exactly what you are trying to do and they are not buying it. We had one pervert, old Slick Willy" in for eight years,an ego maniac _itch this time, NO THANKS!

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 12/25/2007 12:15:38 PM

      I PREFERE A PERVERT, THAN A KILLER OF CHILDREN, AS THE GOP OFFERS! LESS BODY COUNT!

      • Posted By: HellNoHillary @ 12/25/2007 12:20:50 PM

        DOES VINCE FOSTER RING A BELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
        ANYBODY ELECTED IS BETTER THAN ARKANSAS TRAILER TRASH.

  • Posted By: Kodebri @ 12/25/2007 12:17:17 PM

    I believe that it is totally absurd to think that Hillary Clinton secretly ran our country from behind the scenes while Bill Clinton sat back and took orders. If that is the case, then that would mean that Bill was incompetent as a President and would also be incompetent and worthless as our nations First Gentleman. I do not think that is the case. I think Bill was elected and ran this country through his own merit. Furthermore if it was common knowledge that Hillary was running the country for Bill's two terms as President, then I have big problem with Hillary seeking a third term. The Clinton's and the Bush's have been running our nation for 20 years now. It is stupid to think that they and Hillary are the only ones qualified to hold our nations highest office. There are other qualified individuals out there, and if we do not start to consider that, then we should just sit back and watch as they rip up our constitution, and crown someone King.

  • Posted By: are you kidding me @ 12/25/2007 11:54:44 AM

    So she's qualified because she lies, cheats and manipulates (even her husband) to get what she cannot, and has not, been able to achieve legitimately on her own. Only a maniacal and twisted "sister" would put up with the antics of a husband like hers just to be able to abuse people ("behind the scenes") as a means to gain illegitimate power. There are soooo many women with more intellect and more integrity and that are more deserving (IN EITHER PARTY !!!!!!!) of our votes. The democrats should just end this charade of her candidacy as a means to get another eight years of their morally corrupt "BILL".

    By the way.......how many times did it take the smartest woman in the world to pass even one bar exam ???? Or did she ????? Come on people.....she feels absolutely no obligation....EVEN UNDER OATH.....to tell the truth. Like her husband, she chooses to say things and be "factually false". Please find someone else who can make our sons AND DAUGHTERS proud to be an american!!!!

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 12/25/2007 12:12:37 PM

      TRUST ME WE WILL AND IT WILL NOT COME FROM THE GOP! A MORAL BLUNDER IS FAR BETTER THAN A INVASION OF A COUNTRY WHO HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE WTC, COSTING 4000 MORE AMERICAN LIVES, AND 35,000 UNWANTED WOUNDED VETERANS, AT THE MONATARY COST OF 2+ BILLION A DAY WHICH DOES NOT COME BACK TO AMERICAN SOIL!!! GOT THE POINT YET?? I DOUBT IT, IF A BUSH WAS ABLE TO RUN, LIKE JEB, HE WOULD BE THE GOP SAVIOR AND HEAVELY VOTED FOR BY GOP MEMBERS, AND RUN WHAT'S LEFT OF THIS COUNTRY AND OUR CONSTITUTION INTO THE GROUND, AND INVADE IRAN FOR THE BODY COUNT PEROID BECAUSE THEY [MIGHT] HAVE A TACTICAL NUKE [ ONE ] WHICH CANNOT HIT US SOIL, BY 2525! AMERICAN CANNON FADDER FOR THE STRONGEST COUNTRY IN THE MIDDLE-EAST WHO WE MADE NUCLEAR! GOOD MOVE-NOT! TIME TO CARE FOR OURSELVES IN OUR COUNTRY FOR OUR COUNTRY!

  • Posted By: PatrioticAmerican2 @ 12/25/2007 11:51:05 AM

    Flabongid: Your comment, if in the singular, would more appropriately describe the Bozo the shortsighted majority voted into office the last two elections. Scandals and cover-ups abound in his administration, he makes up his own rules, decides which laws he will obey and which he will not.

    To those that voted for him who are now unhappy with his performance (including my mother) : We told you so.

  • Posted By: PatrioticAmerican2 @ 12/25/2007 11:49:25 AM

    Flabongid: Your comment, if in the singular, would more appropriately describe the Bozo the shortsighted majority voted into office the last two elections. Scandals and cover-ups abound in his administration, he makes up his own rules, decides which laws he will obey and which he will not.

    To those that voted for him who are now unhappy with his performance (including my mother) : We told you so.

  • Posted By: lesppt @ 12/25/2007 11:01:04 AM

    It is interesting that Hillary tries to have both ways. On the one hand she claims to have been intimately involved with major(and minor) decisions of the Clnton Administration, but when she has been pushed on issues such as the Health Care Debacle and Trabel Gate, she tries to avoid responsibility. How are we to be confident in such a "leader". Bill did the same thing. Every time a problem arouse, he would try to pass it off to a subordinate; e.g. Waco killings-Janet Reno. Those who want to go back to the Clinton years should be careful what they ask for, they may get it!

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 12/25/2007 11:41:11 AM

      I HOPE SO A ZERO DEFICIT AND EVERY THING THAT GOES WITH IT WOULD BE THE GREATEST THING TO HAPPEN TO THE USA, MAYBE THEN WE CAN B-U-Y OUR COUNTRY BACK FROM CHINA, THAT BUSH MADE AVAIL TO THEM AND JAPAN WITH A BANKRUPTING DEFICIT THAT GROWS DAILY!

  • Posted By: FVee @ 12/25/2007 11:34:00 AM

    This woman is SO much more and better qualified to be President than Edwards and Obama is silly.
    And NONE of the repubicans can match her for vision, intelligence and sheer tenacity.
    with the exception of Joe Biden, she is BY FAR the best person for the job of leading this country out of the mess the republicans have created.

  • Posted By: FVee @ 12/25/2007 11:32:13 AM

    This woman is SO much more and better qualified to be President than Edwards and Obama is silly.
    And NONE of the repubicans can match her for vision, intelligence and sheer tenacity.
    with the exception of Joe Biden, she is BY FAR the best person for the job of leading this country out of the mess the republicans have created.

  • Posted By: Flabongid @ 12/25/2007 11:13:05 AM

    Two of the most unprincipaled Internationals to ever grace the scene of American politics.

    What is sad is.....it appears by the polls, the American voting population love these two insane people.

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 12/25/2007 11:31:32 AM

      I APOLIGIZE FOR OUR CHOICES ARE NOT BRIGHT WHITE ENOUGH FOR YOU! THEY ARE HOWEVER FAR MORE QUALIFIED THAN ANY GOP RUNNING TODAY. SAVE ONE WHO I HAVE NOT RESEARCHED YET, RON PAUL. BRIGHT WHITE ENOUGH FOR YOU?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse