All the "a good mother would have doen this" and "a good mother would have done that" speculations in the world do not constitute evidence. A horrible crime took place. Let's hope that the jurors guessed right and that this mother deserves her conviction and her many years ahead in a cage. Let all of us as potential citizen juors also resolve not to assuage our anger about horrors inflicted by criminals by leaping to inflict horrors of criminal punishment on accused persons when real evidence of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt does not exist. Our system depends on the integrity of juros who undersatnd that the buck stops with them in making the gulit or innocence call and that when they presume guilt, they become the intruments of injustice. The innocence Project has revealed this all too often in recent years, as new DNA technology in a handful of cases can indisoutably prove wrongful convictions. How many more have been sent to the dungeons with erroneous convictions for which no DNA or other absolute proof of innocence is possible?









Discuss