Why Tigers Attack

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: roelallen @ 12/27/2007 3:00:39 AM

    I believe that Mollinedo and the staff of the Zoo where the tiger escaped are the ones culpable for their negligence and for their incompetence in running a Zoo business.

  • Posted By: peteman @ 12/27/2007 2:50:49 AM

    In a number of provinces in India they know how to handle man-eating tigers. they hunt them down and kill them!! For all you animal lovers out there, don't forget..................it's survival of the fittest! If man is just an animal, on equal footing with the tiger, than too bad for the tiger. Don't say "poor tiger", it wouldn't for you! Remember, we are just another animal trying to survive. Do not give man any moral reasonging to show the tiger mercy,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,why should we? We are all just animals; some a little smarter than others.

    By the way, going on safari next week to shoot wild game! Will plug a few tigers when no one is looking.

  • Posted By: WeGotPapi @ 12/27/2007 2:48:21 AM

    Anyone who truly believes that this tiger should have been killed is an idiot to their very core. The animal is a predator, a killer. Taken out of his natural habitat in the name of "entertainment and money." So he got loose, and did what is within the natural order of things for him to do. He preyed and he killed. Of course, it's not natural to you or I, but we are not wild animals, either. I am sorry for the families of those touched by this tragedy, but people....1 plus 2 equals 3. It is as simple as that. The real guilty parties are the humans who locked up this beautiful creature to begin with. So they walk away? Why?? They are at the very core of the reason this happened.

  • Posted By: WeGotPapi @ 12/27/2007 2:41:56 AM

    Anyone who truly believes that this tiger should have been killed is an idiot to their very core. The animal is a predator, a killer. Taken out of his natural habitat in the name of "entertainment and money." So he got loose, and did what is within the natural order of things for him to do. He preyed and he killed. Of course, it's not natural to you or I, but we are not wild animals, either. I am sorry for the families of those touched by this tragedy, but people....1 plus 2 equals 3. It is as simple as that. The real guilty parties are the humans who locked up this beautiful creature to begin with. So they walk away? Why?? They are at the very core of the reason this happened.

  • Posted By: WeGotPapi @ 12/27/2007 2:40:24 AM

    Anyone who truly believes that this tiger should have been killed is an idiot to their very core. The animal is a predator, a killer. Taken out of his natural habitat in the name of "entertainment and money." So he got loose, and did what is within the natural order of things for him to do. He preyed and he killed. Of course, it's not natural to you or I, but we are not wild animals, either. I am sorry for the families of those touched by this tragedy, but people....1 plus 2 equals 3. It is as simple as that. The real guilty parties are the humans who locked up this beautiful creature to begin with. So they walk away? Why?? They are at the very core of the reason this happened.

  • Posted By: Joe M. @ 12/27/2007 2:35:30 AM

    All zoos shoud be shut down. Wild animals belong in the wild, not in cages for the amusement of selfish humans. If you want to see a wild animal, then Google one on the internet. I hope the zoo is mega-sued and shut down along with every other zoo in the world. I feel for that poor tiger.

  • Posted By: Joe M. @ 12/27/2007 2:35:04 AM

    All zoos shoud be shut down. Wild animals belong in the wild, not in cages for the amusement of selfish humans. If you want to see a wild animal, then Google one on the internet. I hope the zoo is mega-sued and shut down along with every other zoo in the world. I feel for that poor tiger.

  • Posted By: WeGotPapi @ 12/27/2007 2:27:24 AM

    This animal never should have been killed. It was man's fault in the very first place for trying to lock up a wild animal and take him out of his natural habitat in an attempt at entertainment and money. I am sorry that these innocent people were killed, but the persons responsible this accident are the people who put a wild animal in a locked cage to begin with. Idiots to the core.

  • Posted By: Ariella @ 12/27/2007 2:14:48 AM

    "Why Tigers Attack". Uh, gee I dunno, maybe because they're tigers. It sounds like these kids might have been asking for it.

  • Posted By: Antigone1000 @ 12/27/2007 2:08:34 AM

    That's a really mean thing to say. The tiger did absolutely nothing wrong and never asked to be in a zoo in the first place. Humans have choices, but we deny them to animals, then we kill them. This animal did absolutely nothing to deserve to be shot.

  • Posted By: polomarco @ 12/27/2007 2:03:21 AM

    I am very glad the tiger was killed......................three cheers for the cops!! Most of the people that have posted here are insane! Give me a break "it is always the animal who suffers", are some of you freaking idots for real! I can only hope that with some kind of poetic justice that the human victim was a member of PETA! I hope that the people who are more concerned with tigers than humans volunteer to feed these little kitties at the San Francisco Zoo. If you are really concerned, maybe you can offer yourselves as human sacrafice for these poor, suffering, misunderstood animals.

  • Posted By: Antigone1000 @ 12/27/2007 1:02:01 AM

    I think it is really unfortunate that the tiger had to be killed. No matter who is truly at fault, it is always the animal who suffers.

  • Posted By: Letxequalx @ 12/27/2007 12:41:44 AM

    In reviewing my previous comment in light of these sensitive times - wish to clarify my previous comment by stating that I feel no one should be harmed- my comment that the designers of the tigers area should have been shot instead of the tigers is meant facetiously. No one should be hurt, expecially people. Just trying to make a point. I love people and tigers.

  • Posted By: 07K21SW @ 12/27/2007 12:35:37 AM

    This zoo did have an emergency crew from my understanding for when an animal escapes they could be called and could tranquilize animals that have escaped so that they are not killed and can be put back in their exhibits without being killed. Because the zoo was so caotic I herd they had to call the police to come. THe cat turned and started walking towards the police men who did not open fire and try to kill the cat when they first saw it. They waited unitl the cat showed agressive behavior and the police officers lives were in danger. If you were a police officer and you were at the scene of the crime, I think you would have killed the cat as well. It is unfortunate that an endangered animal had to be killed, but nder the circumstances, I dont think that anything else could have been done.

  • Posted By: Letxequalx @ 12/27/2007 12:20:37 AM

    I don't understand why they had to kill the tiger!? Is it the tiger's fault? What is supposed to happen if you have an improperly penned animal? If you have a tiger running loose it seems that something like this is likely to happen. How does killing the tiger help this? I think the idea is to keep the animal penned properly -after all- it is a tiger. It's not like a dangerous dog in the neighborhood that has to be put down because it bit somebody. The tiger is a wild animal that is supposed to be in the hands of proffessionals, It's not like a bear that comes out of the wood and starts mauling people - the tiger is supposed to be contained in the first place. I assume these containment areas are designed by engineers and designed in a time of electronics locks, security systems, transponders, video cameras, computer technology - they can't keep track of a couple of tigers? Don't shoot the poor tiger who is only doing what a tiger does- shoot the idiot who designed this system.

    • Posted By: naninanibooboo @ 12/27/2007 12:35:03 AM

      The tiger was in the process of mauling and killing 3 people. There was not time to tranquilize the tiger (it takes time for the tranquilizing agent to work) and prevent 1 death becoming a potential 3 deaths. Shooting the tiger was the only option to end the mauling and protect the emergency responders sent to the Zoo. They really couldn't, at that point, ask the tiger to pretty please leave the guys alone and return to her enclosure.

  • Posted By: 07K21SW @ 12/27/2007 12:34:20 AM

    This zoo did have an emergency crew from my understanding for when an animal escapes they could be called and could tranquilize animals that have escaped so that they are not killed and can be put back in their exhibits without being killed. Because the zoo was so caotic I herd they had to call the police to come. THe cat turned and started walking towards the police men who did not open fire and try to kill the cat when they first saw it. They waited unitl the cat showed agressive behavior and the police officers lives were in danger. If you were a police officer and you were at the scene of the crime, I think you would have killed the cat as well. It is unfortunate that an endangered animal had to be killed, but nder the circumstances, I dont think that anything else could have been done.

  • Posted By: oldefarte @ 12/26/2007 8:01:25 PM

    Gee, I just read that a tiger can jump 30 feet (heck, even a cougar - a third or less the size of a tiger, can jump 18 feet into the air). So, give the beast a running start, surmise that it managed to hook it's claws on the wall and it's just a matter of scrambling up and over (don't believe me? Go to "YouTube" and watch a wild tiger jump onto an elephant's head from about 20 feet away). Why did it do it? Who knows? I'm sorry the animal died. I'm sorry the human died. I'm also sorry so many people on here are so quick to blame the dead person for "taunting" the animal with absolutely NO evidence that that was the case. The bottomline is that sometimes "stuff" happens and sometimes that "stuff" is unfortunate for all concerned.

    • Posted By: naninanibooboo @ 12/27/2007 12:13:07 AM

      The 20 foot wide moat would have severely limited any "running start" . The idea being that a swimming tiger would be unable to heave itself the 18 vertical feet from the water.

  • Posted By: tabbie @ 12/26/2007 9:44:01 PM

    Dear ISHL,
    "Stupid, worthless, filthy" seem to be your words of choice in your limited vocabulary... you need to "gimmee a break" (as you so eloquently stated it)... you talk out of both sides of your mouth... you my friend are clueless... and obviously live in your own little silly world, with your own little silly ideas... people like you scare me!!

    • Posted By: def_scorpion @ 12/27/2007 12:08:07 AM

      Not really very DEAR tabbie,
      I give you the break! but don???t spill your personal crap here, your comment has nothing to do with the concern and if you had a time of whole wide world to memorize the whole oxford dictionary or whatever but you don???t have any right to show this rude and childish behavior to any one for his/her vocabulary.
      If you are so coward that comments make you scare then this is not my or any one else???s fault go and sleep with your mama or whatever but don???t discuss your personal weaknesses here we are least interested in those.

  • Posted By: Russomaha @ 12/26/2007 11:53:26 PM

    To Pauly: I don't think they declaw tigers in big well-equiped Zoos: endangered animals are usually not treated as pets. Plus, those wounds the victims suffered could be a proof.

    If there was a tree, why she or other tigers didn't escape before?

    Howeveer', I'd consider the "tiger-on-tiger " hypothesis, and taunting as well: when they got mad their power mulitplies. I presume, they feed cats after Zoo closed, so she mightve been hungry too!

    RUSSO

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse