Why Tigers Attack

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: vthomp7 @ 12/27/2007 3:31:00 PM

    While I certnly feel for the family, crap happens! NO ONE expects to be killed driving a car, no one expects to get cancer, no one expects to choke on gum.... It was either a freak of nature or someone helped that animal out.

  • Posted By: mike1964 @ 12/27/2007 3:08:54 PM

    Hello petasucks-My "lack" of a philosophical base tells me that the highest form of humanity is the ability to feel compassion. I am truly sorry and disturbed by the death of the young man in this case. However, I also feel compassion for the animal who is only acting instinctively. Yes, they are not higher than humans in the evolutionary chain, but does that mean they do not merit compassion from people? If you feel the need to defend your views by showing how cowardly you are by using a gun to kill the tiger in a cage, then perhaps you are lower in the order of things than you think. If a family member of mine were being attacked and if I had my gun (yes, I do own a gun) I would kill the animal in a second to defend my loved ones. But that doesn't mean you cannot have feelings of remorse for the animal in the end. I look forward to your response, but please don't embarrass yourself this time.

  • Posted By: Tigerbutter @ 12/27/2007 2:49:47 PM

    robmanu7rules: Petasucks is making some excellent points. If we are all just animals equal (or less than equal) to tigers, then we should all be free to act like animals and do whatever we want that makes us happy. If that means killing other animals (read: other people), no matter who they are or for whatever reason, then I guess that is okay by the animal rights folks' way of thinking.

  • Posted By: tigerlvr @ 12/27/2007 2:48:02 PM

    There are only approx 550 of these animals left in the wild, they have been hunted, killed and caged for human entertainment and when one escapes people are shocked that it acted like a wild animal. When will people stop expecting animals to act like they have lost their natural instinics and leave them alone in order for them to live as they were intended?

  • Posted By: Tigerbutter @ 12/27/2007 2:21:11 PM

    Careful, DocMWood, you are making too much sense. I am sure there are people here who think the proper thing for the police would have been for them to be a dessert offering for the tiger. Then, hopefully, if the tiger-god was full enough, he wouldn't eat somebody else until the next day. In other words, just let the tiger have his way. Surely, a small price to pay to keep a beautiful, tiger-on-the-loose happy...and, with any luck, none of the victims would be any of OUR relatives or OUR acquaintances.

    • Posted By: petasucks @ 12/27/2007 2:32:56 PM

      Right-on Tigerbutter! By the way, you don't have a recipe for roasted loin of tiger? I thought you may want to send it to the San Francisco Police?????????????

  • Posted By: petasucks @ 12/27/2007 2:17:51 PM

    mike1964 : You grasp at straws to try and point out typos made by others. The arguments have been made, but you cannot see past your warped philosphical base, or lack thereof. I have read over a number of these post and see no reasoning not to kill the tiger, other than "the poor tiger". Wow, that really works. I am sure that most of our society wants to get rid of zoos too, oh yeah! I will repost something I read earlier that speaks volumes here also:
    When a society values the life of a tiger above that of a person there is a real danger. I think many of these people could fit the mold for becoming good little Nazis. When man is reduced to nothing more than another animal, there is no philosophical base to argue against mans' inhumanity to man. It is "survival of the fittest" , and isn't that just what Hitler thought about the Arian race? Those of you who feel so sorry for the tiger are about as demented as Hitler!


    • Posted By: robmanu7rules @ 12/27/2007 2:32:31 PM

      hey you really need to get a life

  • Posted By: robmanu7rules @ 12/27/2007 2:29:52 PM

    petasucks i agree with you that the tiger should have been shot but you can still feel sorry for it. It is just doing what comes naurally to it. So before you go off on your shitty speaches about *** like hitler think about it you dickhead. I also think zoos are not good. I would like to see you put up a fight against it and think we need to show animals more respect. I don't like to stereotype but i expect you will reply with some ***, but that is what most obese, sad or lonely people do. I hope i am mistaken.

  • Posted By: DocMWood1 @ 12/27/2007 2:28:20 PM

    Re: petasucks; you stated "It is "survival of the fittest" , and isn't that just what Hitler thought about the Arian race? Those of you who feel so sorry for the tiger are about as demented as Hitler!" Huh? Here I was thinking that those who thought it was survival of the fittest (by pointing out "we're on top" and such) were all for killing the tiger, not vice-versa.

  • Posted By: spacegirl444 @ 12/27/2007 2:18:07 PM

    The media is all over this, trying to say zoos are not safe and the animal is at fault. My grandfather owned a very popular zoo before he died. i grew up being around animals. Animals usually only turn when provoked or very hungry. I'm not saying you can go up to a tiger and pet it, but it certainly would not go after someone uless that person drew attention.

  • Posted By: DocMWood1 @ 12/27/2007 2:08:08 PM

    Re: mike1946, "planetman-How can you guarantee the results of your hypothetical poll?" I imagine he can't, but on that point I would have to agree with him. While unfortunate, the police encountered the tiger, which turned to face them as they found each other. Their lives were in danger, and while many would like to have had the time to sedate the tiger, at the time the police simply did not have that luxury. They did the correct action, and further loss of life was prevented.

  • Posted By: mike1964 @ 12/27/2007 1:43:43 PM

    planetman-How can you guarantee the results of your hypothetical poll? Do you think your point is better argued with more quotation marks? And by the way, the word is defer, not differ. You have already proved your inability to back up your argument with facts; now you prove your inability to explain your views properly.

  • Posted By: 42libert @ 12/27/2007 1:40:21 PM

    I suspect the young men were responsible for this tragic occurance.
    I find it hard to believe that they were at the zoo to innocently view the animals at that hour, on Christmas day??? I think they went there specifically to taunt the animals, and knew from previous visits that closing time especially on a holiday was the perfect time to have fun taunting the big cats.. Ha HA You can't get me!!!
    Oops...Tragic consequences..
    Roger P.

  • Posted By: Deb68 @ 12/27/2007 1:29:44 PM

    another beautiful animal lost because of stupid people!

  • Posted By: not_for_our_amusement @ 12/27/2007 1:16:23 PM

    Perhaps if the tiger wasn't in a zoo to begin with, this wouldn't have happened. While I try to understand the point of view of conservationists and zoos, that they want to "preserve" endangered species, the fact still exists that you are taking wild, predatory animals out of their natural habitats and plopping them in the middle of a concrete pen in a city and letting people gawk at them. These things are going to happen, and are not the fault of the animal. Maybe if we left animals alone, and left them where they belong, instead of sticking them in zoos and amusement parks, these attacks wouldn't happen. Let's put the blame where it belongs - on the HUMANS.

  • Posted By: hatethetigers @ 12/27/2007 10:50:09 AM

    These comments by the members of PETA demonstrate how sick they really are. We are so glad the tiger was shot by the police, we are sending thanks to the department. When a society values the life of a tiger above that of a person there is a real danger. I think many of these people could fit the mold for becoming good little Nazis. When man is reduced to nothing more than another animal, there is no philosophical base to argue against mans' inhumanity to man. It is "survival of the fittest" , and isn't that just what Hitler thought about the Arian race? Those of you who feel so sorry for the tiger are about as demented as Hitler!

    • Posted By: ferrynheart @ 12/27/2007 1:13:44 PM

      hatethetigers; you shouldn't be accusing anyone of being a Nazi, or comparing their ideas to Hitler's concept of a superior race. Your name, which embraces the word "hate", and your ignorant comments about wanting to ride the world of "weaklings" demonstrate that you, above all others represented here, have a Nazi mentality. I'd much rather encounter a tiger than a hypocritical, hate-mongering, ignorant bigot like you anyday. I'm sure the tiger would have more integrity (and humanity).

  • Posted By: kje1245 @ 12/27/2007 12:30:17 PM

    Im glad the tiger was killed. it killd a person.

    • Posted By: Deb68 @ 12/27/2007 1:12:36 PM

      your an idiot, next time you jump into the cage and let the tiger atttack you!

  • Posted By: marionlesz @ 12/27/2007 1:11:41 PM

    Luv the points there Doc...very eloquent. People who refuse to think is the reason there are warning labels on everything these days

  • Posted By: skimmel @ 12/27/2007 1:11:31 PM

    Well, folks....we as humans are to blame for this happening..... we are the ones who take these beautiful creatures from their natural habitats and cage them in.... and then blame the animal for exhibiting part of it's natural instincts. I too am sorry for the families and their loss.... but let's put the balme where it really belongs. We as humnas think that we can control so many aspects of nature when in reality, it's nature that untimately controls us.

  • Posted By: Deb68 @ 12/27/2007 1:11:05 PM

    THERE WAS NO REASON THIS TIGER HAD TO DIE. IT WAS TAUNTED. THOSE BOYS CAUSED THE WHOLE MESS. THIS WAS A WILD ANIMAL, IT CAN NEVER BE TAMED. THAT IS IT'S NATURE. THIS TIGER WAS MORE SCARED OF THOSE PUNKS. AN ANMAL DIED BECAUSE OF THEM. I HAVE BEEN TO SO MANY ZOOS, THERE IS ALWAYS AN IDIOT TRYING TO GET AN ANIMALS ATTENTION, THEY DESERVE WHAT THEY GET!

  • Posted By: Russomaha @ 12/26/2007 11:23:31 PM

    To Bobin La: while to exclude the taunting hypothesis right away? Christmas evening, a 17-year kid, may be drunk, or just "playful". I saw idiots in ANY Zoo playing with fire. Or is it politically incorrect, am I missing smth? Maybe kid's name?

    RUSS

    • Posted By: puppylove @ 12/27/2007 1:10:41 PM

      MSN had a story today - Thur 12/27/07 - regarding a tennis shoe and blood being found in between fence and moat/wall indicating that someone (probably one of the teens) stuck his foot inside the enclosure while taunting the animal. Tatiana (sp?) definitely didnt reach through fence and pull leg in. I do not discount the taunting theory. And while it is true the cat didn't need to be taunted or provoked in order to attack, it is just as likely that teasing was what provoked it to find a way out. It is difficult not to feel somewhat a voyeour when you see animals in captivity and they look at us so sad.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse