Top Seven Health Myths

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: aqjh2 @ 12/28/2007 10:54:39 AM

    Concerning the "water debate": Fluid and electrolyte balance calculations indicate a base minimum of 3 litres of fluid per 24 hour period as the MAINTENANCE fluid input required to service the body's needs. 3 Litres equates to not eight, but twelve(12) of the 250 ml drinking glasses in common use. The estimated requirement of 8 glasses of fluid, be it water or otherwise, most likely takes into account the fact that some water is indeed contained in the other foods we consume; but it is misleading to suggest that all our fluid requirements can be met by the routine quantities of water-containing foods, sodas and other miscellaneous drinks imbibed by chance during a typical day. I believe it is necessary to vet the "facts" being posted about medical issues by non-medical personnel on the internet, because even worse than a layman taking a doctor's misinformed medical opinion as fact is a layman taking ANOTHER LAYMAN's misinformed opinion as gospel. A word to the wise

    • Posted By: ittakesbrains @ 12/28/2007 11:23:55 AM

      aqjh2, your comments are very wise in on the whole, but I don't see where the article ever said that eight glasses of water caused water intoxication. What it said was that 8 glasses on top of juice, numerous sodas, coffee, milk and all the water contained in foods we eat was excessive and great excess could cause water intoxication. I restricted juice and sodas were not allowed in my home, but milk was never restricted. I had one boy who would drink a gallon every day if you let him (and often did.) I never tried to get him to drink additional water (although I did try and get him to replace a few glasses of milk with glasses of water because Ihalf believd the myth) as I knew that too much liquid was as unhealthy as too little (although too little is far more common. What the author was trying to say, if people bothered to analyze anything anymore, was that MODERATION is the KEY!!! a mixture of milk, juice, soda (preferably little of this because sugar and carbonation are not real healthy for us) plus water to equal 8- 8oz glasses of liquid a day (on top of the moisture in foods we eat) is about right for most people. Athletes need more, young children need less, workers in the need a little more, workers in airconditioned offices made not need as much. MODERATION IS THE KEY!!! And being aware of our cunsumption is the answer!!!

  • Posted By: psvagrsv @ 12/28/2007 11:21:46 AM

    This article is pointing at medical practitioners who think that the"myths" are "fact". You are simply proving the point. If you want to sway people into believing, then submit some facts with documents and studies preformed to back it up.

  • Posted By: harycary@verizon.net @ 12/28/2007 11:20:59 AM

    When I try to access "Top Photo Galleries" for your sites on the 4 on pg.8in this week's Nwsweek I cannot access them. How come?

  • Posted By: psvagrsv @ 12/28/2007 11:20:07 AM

    re: Medical Resources Intl

    This article is pointing at medical practitioners who think that the"myths" are "fact". You are simply proving the point. If you want to sway people into believing, then submit some facts with documents and studies preformed to back it up.

  • Posted By: TammyP @ 12/28/2007 11:18:35 AM

    I have a newspaper article and picture of my policeman father from the Goshen News (Indiana) back in the 70's, holding an apple with razor blades in it.

  • Posted By: esbee @ 12/28/2007 8:15:04 AM

    How about the myth veterinarians have that the NAIS is about protecting us from animal disease? It is not. NAIS (national animal identification system),is a marketing plan for corporate ag (and chip makers). Big ag reaps all the benefits of NAIS (global market) while putting all the hard work/cost of microchipping, filing birth, death and movement reports and loss of livestock through depopulation(should animal disease be suspected, not confirmed) on the average livestock owner, even if that person owns only one livestock animal as a pet. Big Ag does not have to individually tag and track their animals, they get only one lot number per groups of animals. See nonais dot org for more info on how this program will affect everyone who eats.

    • Posted By: donkeyodie @ 12/28/2007 11:18:07 AM

      Or the myth that NAIS is needed for food safety? The USDA's new business plan for NAIS has added tracking 2.2 million EIA-negative horses to their top tier of importance. EIA is not communicable to humans and extremely rare ( .008% those tested) . The cost to the economy for this testing is over 50 million dollars. And then there is myth that the USDA/FDA does have funds for better inspection of meat-processing plants or for port inspection.

    • Posted By: donkeyodie @ 12/28/2007 11:06:40 AM

      Or that myth that NAIS is will about food safety - even though the USDA's new NAIS emphasis is on tracking 2,2 million horses for a disease that is not communicable to humans and affects about .008% of the horses tested? The cost per year to the horse industry: over 50 million dollars. And there also the myth that the USDA/FDA just does not have the funds to improve inspections of imported food....

  • Posted By: Newcastle Farm @ 12/28/2007 11:12:02 AM

    The Myth of Hair Growth and Fingernail Growth probably is the result of not knowing exactly the time of death.
    In some cases of Death in days past, some appeared dead and yet they were really still alive, rather shallow heart beat and comatose, yet they were really alive.

    Even today we read about an individual having been declared Dead and whild awaiting either Autopsy or Embalming the so called Stiff got Loose and awoke to Startle all around.

  • Posted By: ittakesbrains @ 12/28/2007 11:09:50 AM

    Doc Pearce clearly you are not really a doctor. Diabetes is caused by numerous problems...However, sugar is not necessarily one of them. I have studied this extensively because their is a strong family history on my side and I worried about my children. I carefully curtailed sugars as they grew up. I ensured that starches were complex and high in fiber. I restricted even great amounts of juices, but freely allowed milk. I was careful to instill an understanding that they should drink plenty of water, and when they were little, I gave them four to six glasses (8 oz or more each) in addition to their milk. Even as babies, I gave them extra bottles of water. My doctor told me I was being so careful that I was frightening my children. Well, 2 developed diabetes anyway. However, I am obese, a sugar junkie, and would rather go without than drink water, it tastes obcene (unless you purchase bottled, which is prohibitively expensive); yet I have no symptoms of even developing diabetes. My sugar has been stable at 110-118 every six month doctor check since I was 25 and began putting on so much weight. That was 31 years ago.
    However, my husband, who has NO family history and rarely eats sweets (although he does like breads) developed diabetes at 41. This article is not suggesting that you not dirnk water, but my doctor said that consuming more that 3 quarts of fluid (unless an athlete of constant training) is excess and if more than half of that is water, it could destabilize the electrolites by over-flushing the body's systems. People need to know that everything, EVERYTHING, even liquids and water ishould be consumed in moderation. That is 8 (8oz) glasses of fluid (at least half of which is water) and no more than one soda per day is moderate and HEALTHY!!! Your comments simply show that you also have preconceived and some-what unfounded myths. My weight problem is not caused by food (although it certainly doesn't help) but by a damaged and hyper-vigilant adrenal gland, which in turn stimulates my thyroid and other glands, some of which make me feel hungry even though I have completed a full and (for most people) satifying meal. Don't try and pretend to be a doctor when you clearly arn't!!!

  • Posted By: Medical Resources Intl @ 12/28/2007 11:05:50 AM

    Well, as a medical practitioner, I have to say that some of these so-called "myths" are NOT so, There HAVE been documented cases of tampered-with halloween candy given by sociopaths...and not only poisons, but high potency laxatives (same thing to a child), glass shards, metal fragments and razor blades.

    As for eye strain, it is not the length of time you are reading, but the pattern of repeated stess that ends up eamaging eyes, decreasing accomodation and leading to myupitiv stress.



    Just as being in the cold does not automatically make you sick, it DOES suppress your immune system at a time when you are going to be prone to pick up something you otherwise would not...thus it is a major contributing factor...and most parents know that getting too cold facilitates ear pain, contracting the eustachian tube, increasing mucoidsecretions...an medial otitis waiting to happen.

    Nails and hair, because of their composition, do grow for a few days. Not significantly, but the cells do get pushed from the cuticle and follicle after the rest of the ystem has shut down. So that is not entirely unture, either.


    As far as the water issue, kidney function is vital to good health balance. Caffeine is a diuretic and does not support intra/intercellular water levels. Sugary concoctions (sodas, etc) are also detrimental to the system and are not counted in the water needs on a daily basis. The best way to keep one's sytem healthy and functioning at an optimal state is to keep the system flushing out toxins and providing poure water (not filled with heavy metals such as our tap water).

    I'm not sure who wrote this article, but they are either under-informed or falsely claiming expertise where none exists.

  • Posted By: locofoco @ 12/28/2007 11:00:50 AM

    I personally agree with the Halloween candy. We never hear of kids being poisoned by candy, yet every year parents worry that their children will be harmed in some way. They just need to take a deep breath and calm down.

  • Posted By: patcope @ 12/28/2007 10:46:33 AM

    A woman in Sacramento, CA died of water intoxication earlier this year, because of a radio contest, so I don't think that the author was exaggerating all that much. Also, in regard to soda as a source of water, there's always diet soda which can be drunk "in a pinch," so to speak. Lastly, I've worked in medical offices for the past 25 years and, believe me, the best doctors have earned the right to have big egos, they're that good at what they do.

  • Posted By: Bob Barker @ 12/28/2007 10:41:43 AM

    I personally know a Marine who had water intoxication, or hyponutremia. He was very close to death, and without treatment, would not have survived. This happened in the 120+ degree heat of Kuwait.

  • Posted By: rcc516 @ 12/28/2007 9:29:34 AM

    As a neurologist, I share the sentiment of the previous comment. With the added fact that everything we do in medicine is a calculated risk, often based on very small percentages IE the risk reduction of stroke by aspirin. Besides, would you like your family member to be the 1.2% that has a clinically significant event because some idiot has to check his email on his blackberry.

    • Posted By: SueQ @ 12/28/2007 10:37:59 AM

      Are you saying that aspirin does NOT reduce the occurrence of a stroke? I'm a little confused by that statement. Please clarify.

  • Posted By: kristycolley @ 12/28/2007 10:33:55 AM

    The author is a bit exaggerated in his water intoxication leading to death. Takes quite a bit of water to do that, and 8 glasses will not. I would like to see the scientific evidence proving how much water is in our food, etc. Considering a large majority of people are walking around dehydrated, it's always a good thing to drink more water!

  • Posted By: kristycolley @ 12/28/2007 10:33:05 AM

    The author is a bit exaggerated in his water intoxication leading to death. Takes quite a bit of water to do that, and 8 glasses will not. I would like to see the scientific evidence proving how much water is in our food, etc. Considering a large majority of people are walking around dehydrated, it's always a good thing to drink more water!

  • Posted By: kristycolley @ 12/28/2007 10:32:05 AM

    The author is a bit exaggerated in his water intoxication leading to death. Takes quite a bit of water to do that, and 8 glasses will not. I would like to see the scientific evidence proving how much water is in our food, etc. Considering a large majority of people are walking around dehydrated, it's always a good thing to drink more water!

  • Posted By: docpearce @ 12/28/2007 10:28:08 AM

    Wow. Water intoxication. Are you serious? Do you have any idea how much water you would have to drink to even get close to water intoxication? And you don't need 8 glasses of water per day to stay hydrated (unless you exercise intensely which most of you don't) but it does help to flush the system of toxins. Lastly I wouldn't let soda be my source of water unless I want to develop diabetes, be very lethargic, and become obese. Dr. Pearce

  • Posted By: loncraw @ 12/28/2007 10:20:49 AM

    Your last "myth" is very misleading at best, and I would call it just plain wrong. In 1974 Ronald O''Brien of Pasadena Texas handed out cyanide-laced Pixie Sticks (Remeber those?. This event drove them off the market.) to a number of children. Although O'Brien's son was the only fatality, the fact remains that the other children were definitely at risk from tampered Halloween candy.

    • Posted By: loncraw @ 12/28/2007 10:25:47 AM

      Opps - correct spelling is O'Bryan. Looks like I need to check my facts better as well.

  • Posted By: Atlanta Doctor @ 12/28/2007 9:45:16 AM

    TFERRAN IS A DOPE. THE WHOLE POINT OF THE ARTICLE IS THAT THESE MISCONCEPTIONS ARE COMMONLY HELD, EVEN BY MANY OF US PHYSICIANS. THE AUTHOR IS IN FACT CORRECT ON ALL COUNTS.

    • Posted By: Habsolute @ 12/28/2007 10:24:06 AM

      100% correct. This is just another person who refuses to admit when he / she is wrong, and can't believe he / she would be so silly as to believe everything he / she has heard over the course of his / her life.

      Um, but just 'cause you're right now, doesn't mean you're ALWAYS right ;-) hehe jokes, Doc, only jokes...

  • Posted By: newsgirl @ 12/28/2007 5:36:03 AM

    to omigosh:
    Sorry, your "facts" about the myths you say aren't totally correct- polyunsaturated fats are more liquid, which decreases their chance of clogging the arteries, whereas saturated fats are easier to cause this blocakage, therefore increasing one's chances for heart disaease and stroke, among other medical conditions realted to arterial blockages; vitamins, minerals and phytonutrients are being found to have more benefits than before found through new research; LDL cholesterol IS more dangerous than HDL levels in the body; organically grown foods have been tested in various studies to have more nutrient levels, one reason being that the use of organic fertilizers especially from compost does have more minerals than the convential fertilizers which usually are only based on 3 minerals, potassium, nitrogen and phosphorus, and this affects the produce in which it is grown in; mercury-based amalgam fillings HAVE been found to be more dangerous than other types of tooth fillings - mercury is a deadly heavy poison that has been shown on numerous occasions to cause certain medical problems. You may be a doctor but you need to do more research on what is really true, not just believe the media and medical industry promoting hogwash that is promulgated enough to unwary gullible minds in order to continue to spread lies that can hurt the general populace. (And yes, I am a medical researcher so I am not making my counterstatements up!)

    • Posted By: risdmom @ 12/28/2007 8:41:48 AM

      The reason polyunsaturates do not clog arteries has nothing to do with them being "more liquid". The chain of molecules in a polyunsaturated fat has bends or kinks that prevent them from laying flat and piling up upon each other(simplistic description-but true). I would hope medical researchers would have an organic bio class.

      • Posted By: jorge_mt @ 12/28/2007 10:18:18 AM

        Well, sorry, but isn't that the definition of liquid? If they can't pile up, they flow and that is what being liquid is all about. I would hope organic bio dudes would have a hydrodynamics class...

    • Posted By: Omigosh @ 12/28/2007 6:41:49 AM

      I am afraid that these nonsensical and quaisi-scientific myths of mdern medicine have indeed been tested, retested and studied time and time again and it is clear that there are no statistically signifcant findings that any of these things are even remotely accurate. .. this is excatly the kind of political rhetoric that is most often used to promulgate such myths and or extrapolate facts not in evidence for the pusrpose of scaring into submission those who would, based upon the fear, shell out billions upon billions of wasted dollars to protect themselves from the propoganda... These premses area as easily dunked as bizzare birdflu epidemics that never materilaize or the silly global warming/cooling ponzi shcemes of the present day. There is just no evidence to back up the claims and they must be taken purely on faith by the beliver in a fashion akin to faith healing........

      • Posted By: mlm51 @ 12/28/2007 8:00:43 AM

        Your reply was both thoughtful and interesting. Appears that you know something every once in a while. Ha! Ha! Your comments on faith healing were of interest to me. I strongly believe in faith healing because of the evidence I have witness over my professional life. What do you say?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse