Top Seven Health Myths

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Memphian @ 12/28/2007 10:14:06 AM

    tferran - First of all, it's "nutritionist" not "nutritionalist". Second, like Atlanta Doctor pointed out, these are myths that are held even by doctors, but are just that: myths, which are fictitious. Third, what's this about a child in Orlando finding a piece of candy with a razor blade in it? Sounds like another urban legend (those are fictitious as well) and unless you can produce a news account of it from a reliable source, I don't believe it. Fourth, looks to me like the writer did their research since they were using sources that have been published in the British Medical Journal as well as studies from prestigious medical institutions (like the Mayo Clinic). And, finally, do you really think this writer should be fired? Good grief.

    I, for one, welcome this article. One of my pet peeves is the rampant belief in what we call "old wives' tales" or urban legends.

  • Posted By: bray64 @ 12/28/2007 10:11:23 AM

    I think this writer is very amusing. We are trained to think all of these ideas are fact. However, through my studies I have also come across very similar arguments. It is scientifically proven that there is no need for 8 glasses of water a day.; but if you would like to detox your body the best way to do that is to drink water. The author is not a idiot, just ready to hear a lot of heat from people who are trained one way of thinking. kudos to the author...

  • Posted By: tammyl @ 12/28/2007 10:07:32 AM

    and next week it will be the oposite....when will it stop...

  • Posted By: Gardner30 @ 12/28/2007 10:03:52 AM

    Having Halloween candy x-rayed began when sharp, harmful objects were found in the candy, and some children were injured. The "poisoning" in the article is bogus, unless one counts sharp objects as poisonous. Any physician should know that no body parts grow in the body after death. Bacteria in the colon reproduce in unembalmed bodies to initiate all soft tissuedestruction --the dust to dust process.

  • Posted By: shalom @ 12/28/2007 10:00:41 AM

    I liked the article. tferran, bless your heart sounds like you are a little stressed. The author should be fired? God that made me laugh. Anyway, to counter your actions, go do something nice for someone today. Or just find a quiet spot to meditate and chill out.

  • Posted By: crystal@iscg.net @ 12/28/2007 10:00:33 AM

    Re: brain usage. I think the author begs the question. A gallon jug with an ounce of liquid in it is being used, just not to its full capacity. Stroke studies have shown that patients can learn to use otherwise unused portion of the brain to relearn tasks.

  • Posted By: LizzyRN @ 12/28/2007 9:58:55 AM

    I agree with tferran about the water myth. Being a labor and delivery nurse I see the benefits of drinking water everyday. I often see patients that complain of contractions while they are preterm and even term. When asked how much water they have had the answer is usually less than 2-3 glasses per day. Then, miracle of miracles, when we start an IV and hydrate them, the contractions go away. As to the other myths, I will freely admit am not qualified to comment.

  • Posted By: shalom @ 12/28/2007 9:57:00 AM

    I liked the article, and as for the xray comment, obviously they set it up to find objects in the candy. tferran, bless your heart you sound extremely stressed. The author should be fired? Go do something to relax, try meditating, do something nice for someone today, lay off the caffeine.

  • Posted By: gellismd @ 12/28/2007 9:56:20 AM

    As a physician I must agree with Atlanta Doctor. The point of the article was commonly held misconceptions, not whether or not eating things off the sidewalk is a bad idea. tferran if you don't like it then don't read it. And the eight glass of water thing is a crock of sh*t, I tell my patients to drink plenty of fluids for various reasons but I don't specify eight glasses (is "a glass" a standard or metric measure of volume?).

  • Posted By: Illinois Professor @ 12/28/2007 9:54:06 AM

    Tferran: Granted, the better way to hydrate is to drink water, but it is not absolutely necessary to drink water to BE hydrated. As for the Halloween candy, the author is generally correct, but there will always be individual instances that contradict a general statement. Carroll, as Atlanta Doctor says, is correct about the other widely-held misconceptions. It seems as if Tferran is just being negative for the heck of it. Understand the purpose of an article and then understand its methods. Carroll isn't stupid and shouldn't be fired! Geez. I hope Tferran isn't a boss. How unbelievably judgmental can you get?

  • Posted By: Zardox @ 12/28/2007 9:50:43 AM

    tferran, it is a "Fluff" piece. If this really gets you that uppset - enough to throw insults, then please stay away from political issues.
    Get a grip.

  • Posted By: Zardox @ 12/28/2007 9:49:10 AM

    tferran - it is a fluff piece. Get a grip.

  • Posted By: Zardox @ 12/28/2007 9:48:36 AM

    tferran - it is a fluff piece. Get a grip.

  • Posted By: tferran @ 12/28/2007 9:33:30 AM

    Did the writer of this article ever study the local news or newspapers? Did they ever seek advice from a nutritionalist? Obviously not. As to the poisoned candy, how can an x-ray machine detect poison in candy anyway? The whole reasoning behind having the candy x-rayed is to detect sharp objects and metal inside the candy. Just this halloween, a chlld in Orlando found a piece of candy lying on the sidewalk on halloween night with a razor blade inside of it. This is not a myth people!!! This writer should be fired. Further, regarding water intake, any nutritionalist or doctor will tell you to hydrate your body with fluid by drinking eight glasses of water per day. They did not say that you should include 2 cans of soda along with that! Please Newsweek, hire some intelligent people who actually research the subject before writing!

  • Posted By: tferran @ 12/28/2007 9:33:04 AM

    Did the writer of this article ever study the local news or newspapers? Did they ever seek advice from a nutritionalist? Obviously not. As to the poisoned candy, how can an x-ray machine detect poison in candy anyway? The whole reasoning behind having the candy x-rayed is to detect sharp objects and metal inside the candy. Just this halloween, a chlld in Orlando found a piece of candy lying on the sidewalk on halloween night with a razor blade inside of it. This is not a myth people!!! This writer should be fired. Further, regarding water intake, any nutritionalist or doctor will tell you to hydrate your body with fluid by drinking eight glasses of water per day. They did not say that you should include 2 cans of soda along with that! Please Newsweek, hire some intelligent people who actually research the subject before they write an article!

  • Posted By: Skulldugger7 @ 12/28/2007 9:30:38 AM

    Incidentally, on three occasions in the past six months, my blackberry sitting on the bathroom counter has received a call and turned on my cordless razor sitting next to it. Weird - and not too much of a stretch to think that it could adversely affect electronic equipment.

    And by the way, I find no problem whatsoever in questioning ANYONE's knowledge. It's our responsibility as free-thinking humans.

  • Posted By: spilcher123 @ 12/28/2007 8:38:50 AM

    Cell phones can and do store static electricity and can spark a fire in the presence of Oxygen.! This is the most cited reason for the prohibition of cell phones in hospital areas. The same as the warnings at a gas station. Althought the statistics are minute as to the number of cases where this has occured, I for one do not want to be one of those "rare" cases. In addition, althought the percentage, 1.2% for failure rate of medical equipment is again "rare", I for one do not want to be among the 1.2% whose medical equipment failed because someone was talking on a cell phone....

    • Posted By: texmoto @ 12/28/2007 9:08:28 AM

      Again, I'm calling BS here. Oxygen! Do you mean like the 20% in the air we breath everyday? Are you referring to a high O2 concentration area? Like under 100% non-rebreather face mask? And while a spark may be generated by a cell phone, the danger of this comes from the gasoline FUMES released while filling your tank, NOT the fact the O2 is present in the air. BTW, what study are you quoting for the "1.2 percent failure rate?" Sounds like a "home-made" number.

      • Posted By: marshallr0ss @ 12/28/2007 9:27:56 AM

        The 1.2 failure rate was cited in the article above.
        I would also venture to guess that most of us understood that the danger in a hospital would come from the O2 used there while the danger at a gas station would come from gasoline fumes. Most of us were intelligent enough to be able to make that connection without you attacking spilcher's comment.

      • Posted By: marshallr0ss @ 12/28/2007 9:25:49 AM

        The 1.2 failure rate was cited in the article above.
        I would also venture to guess that most of us understood that the danger in a hospital would come from the O2 used there and the danger at a gas station came from gasoline fumes. Most of us were able to make that connection without you attacking spilcher's comment.

  • Posted By: RationalTim20 @ 12/28/2007 9:24:59 AM

    I think we need to keep in mind that a myth can be based on some remote fact so yes an element of truth could be behind them all. The point is probably that in general, these are not as true as people would believe e.g., your child does not need to have their Halloween candy x-rayed, just use common sense. As for the cell phone thing in hospitals, seems to me 1.2% is enough in an ICU environment to have people turn them off. People need to get over their cell phone and crackberry habits, it's bad enough they are causing auto accidents, disturbing movies and talking loudly in public places...just rude.

  • Posted By: franktiger @ 12/28/2007 7:46:54 AM

    The biggest myths of all times is that vaccines work , no double study ever done. That is why laws were passed by congress to protect to protect drug companies to make hurge profits.Gulf war veterans web site has 23,000 vets died from antrax vaccine. The nurarmberg trails excuted German leaders for force vaccines and today our leaders are forcing vaccines on children that do more harm than good.

    • Posted By: jcarrer1 @ 12/28/2007 9:24:07 AM

      Well franktiger, looks as if you believe all that you read on the web! Your are easily persuaded, sign of a weak mind I am afraid.

    • Posted By: Brody @ 12/28/2007 8:03:47 AM

      franktiger,

      Vaccines can have side effects, but how can you say they don't work? How do you explain the eradication of smallpox?

      • Posted By: iakandbmk @ 12/28/2007 8:11:27 AM

        smallpox is not totally eradicated, but it has been limited to a small population. Alll vaxicines have some danger but i would not want to see what would happen to the world without them.

        A very good example of a disease that is under control here in the US is polio. I have seen the effects if this horrible disease in countries where they either don't or can't vaxcinate aginst this. And it truly is freightening.

  • Posted By: LaughingTooHard @ 12/28/2007 9:22:49 AM

    I think the point of the 1.2% is that is statistically insignificant. You can never completely remove other factors besides what you are testing for so the 1.2% could have been testing error, or even solar radiation flux. I think in case of an error they would - um simply retest. Add that to the fact newer cell phones are less powerful and emit less EMF radiation, thus the 2007 study had nothing to report.

    In reading the comments I was most taken with "I read", "I heard", "I know" statements. If you didn't personally experience, it is myth by default. A news media article does not count as scientific evidence. Nor does someone relating a ???possible??? recount - not every agency of authority exist to tell lies and deceive. Even worse, were those that defied the report or tried to discredit it with personal statements- how laughable!

    I would personally rather be blissfully unaware of an infinitesimal possible event then paranoid terrified about it actually happening but ???to each their own!???

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse