Quantcast
 
 
 
COMMENTARY

Scrambling for a Response

Rice's regional strategy may have died with Bhutto, endangering U.S. interests.

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

A few days before Christmas, Benazir Bhutto e-mailed one of her friends and advisers in Washington, the military analyst and columnist Harlan Ullman. Talking of Pakistan's upcoming parliamentary election, Bhutto said, "The only outcome is for democracy to win. I pray that happens. Otherwise, I fear Pakistan will descend into chaos."

Bhutto's assassination at a rally in Rawalpindi pushes Pakistan closer to the chaos she feared. "Pakistan was facing serious political instability even before this happened," says Washington military analyst Anthony Cordesman. "There is no question this event makes it worse."

The Bush administration, with senior officials still scattered after the Christmas break, was scrambling to assess the situation. President Bush, vacationing in Crawford, Texas, was told of the murder at his usual morning brief. He emerged later to condemn "this cowardly act by murderous extremists who are trying to undermine Pakistan's democracy."

Reconciliation and democracy were the administration's prescription for Pakistan. In background briefings over the past couple of months, State Department officials have been upfront about Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's thinking. Rice was convinced that stability in Pakistan required a power-sharing accord between President Pervez Musharraf and the exiled Benazir Bhutto, perhaps the country's most popular civilian political leader. It was administration pressure—along with promises of additional U.S. aid—that persuaded Musharraf to allow Bhutto to return from her eight-year exile in October. And it took Rice's personal dialogue with Bhutto to persuade Bhutto that some form of power sharing with Musharraf offered the best option for stability in Pakistan. A privately negotiated deal to this end between Musharraf and Bhutto broke down. But the other strand of Rice's policy—to persuade Musharraf to doff his military uniform, cede control of the army (at least formally), and rule as an elected civilian president—had worked. Musharraf resigned as army chief of staff at the end of November. And recent polls suggested the scheduled Jan. 8 elections would give Bhutto's Pakistan People's Party a working majority of seats in parliament, duly making Bhutto prime minister—and sealing the Musharraf-Bhutto partnership that was Rice's goal.

This strategy died with Bhutto. With the current unrest, elections are unlikely to be held as scheduled. And Bhutto, the longtime "chairperson for life" of the Pakistan People's Party, leaves no clear successor in the party. Meanwhile, the other main opposition leader, Nawaz Sharif—like Bhutto a former prime minister and like Bhutto a recent return from exile—is still forbidden under Pakistani law from taking office again. Besides, Sharif and Musharraf loathe and distrust each other. (Whereas Bhutto had established a real, if wary, relationship with Musharraf.)

In the hours after Bhutto's death, administration officials were teleconferencing, sorting out the facts of the assassination and starting to shape a response. "We're all scrambling," said one midlevel Defense Department official involved in the effort to find out more and to assess the possible consequences. "What everyone agrees is that nothing looks good," he added. But perhaps the administration should have already had a postassassination plan in place: the killing of Benazir Bhutto was always in the cards. Bhutto realized the risk. In her frequent visits to Washington last fall—before her return to Pakistan—she confronted the risk with a certain stoic pride. "Death has always been the price my family has paid," she said at one dinner gathering. "My father was murdered. My two brothers were assassinated. I know there will be those who will want to kill me. But I have a duty to the people of Pakistan."

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: ritu @ 01/10/2008 6:02:17 AM

    Comment: I wish one could think of some way to get out of this horrific situation but as far as one can see its a no win situation at the moment. What Pakistan needs at this point in time is to go beyond differences and unite . Its certainly better to have a country than to be known as a Refugee.

  • Posted By: vickyB @ 01/08/2008 1:56:38 PM

    Comment: This article is absurd, infact shows that the writer and the editor had little or no knowledge about what they were writing. Pakistan inthe last five years have become the only MUSLIM majority country where moderates rule and extremists, may they be religious, cultural, ideological etc, have either been cornered or rooted out. Its ironic to see that reputed magazines like Newsweek and others are no different than our local language newspapers, who for trivial personal gains can print anything which is eyecatching yet baseless, once it comes to educating people about the national and international updates. This effort of yours will pay you nothing except that, readers like me and my friends, not only you will loose your credibility, as you have at leats in my group, but people who believed in the idea of FREEDOM of SPEECH will also shed this sweet dream and consider it as a nightmare. I know this epistle will not affect your bizzare and intentional (PAID ALSO) attitude but just wanted to do this last favour to someone i always looked forward to for enlightening my horizon. I must also assure you that yes negligible number of people may buy your idea, temporarily, but PAKISTANIS as a nation now know that who is paying you and for what. We as a nation will make sure that your evil designs are not met. Keep trying but at the end you will not only be a loser but will also be embarassed.

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 12/28/2007 5:44:48 AM

    Comment: We are in big trouble extremist and children of moderates all around the world are being seduced by the chapter of JIHAD. If you look at the Madrassa's they are brainwashing futre genereations in that region with the chapter of JIHAD. IT is like subliminal indoctrination. This is very dangerous. THEY ARE TEACHING THE CHILDREN TO FIGHT JIHAD FOR one hundred years. Obama is the only candidate that can change antiamericanism in that region. It just feels right voting for OBAMA

Sponsored by
 

Benazir Bhutto Dies


 
PAKISTAN

How will Musharraf's decision to postpone Pakistan's elections affect the fortunes of Benazir Bhutto's political party?

 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Speedo's new and controversial high-tech LZR suit is helping swimmers smash dozens of records. How the company plans to capitalize on Olympic gold.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu