Quantcast
 
 
 

More Mitt Malarkey

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

The claim is based on the immigration bill that McCain cosponsored in 2005 and 2006. The bill died, but as we said before, the measure did not propose to pay Social Security benefits to illegal immigrants, not until and unless they become U.S. citizens or are granted legal status. Under current law, illegal immigrants who work and pay Social Security taxes may later receive credit toward future benefits for the amounts they have paid, if they become legal residents or citizens. The McCain measure wouldn't have changed that.

During the immigration fight Republicans proposed an amendment that would have prevented anyone who became a legal immigrant under the McCain bill from receiving credit toward future Social Security benefits  for the taxes they paid and the time they had worked while in the U.S. without legal permission. McCain was one of 11 Republicans who voted to kill that amendment.

Thus, the statement that McCain "voted to allow illegals to collect Social Security" is false. Nobody proposed to pay benefits to anyone who is in the U.S. illegally. To be accurate, the ad might have said that McCain "voted against a measure that would have denied illegal immigrants Social Security credit for their work once they gain legal status." But such a truthful statement might not strike New Hampshire voters as so damaging.

"Amnesty" Again
The Romney ad also misleads by using the inaccurate and emotionally laden term "amnesty" to describe what the immigration bill would have offered illegal immigrants. As we've said any number of times, the dictionary definition of "amnesty" is a pardon for past offenses, and the McCain bill did not offer a simple pardon. Rather, it would have imposed thousands of dollars in penalties and fees on any illegal immigrant wishing to gain legal status.

The ad's wording is technically accurate on this score. It says, "He [Romney] opposes amnesty for illegals." What's misleading is the suggestion that McCain embraces "amnesty," when he doesn't. Romney's ad might truthfully have said he currently takes a tougher line on illegal immigrants than does McCain, but characterizing his opponent as favoring "amnesty" isn't accurate.

Also, while the former governor has hardened his stance on immigration, it's worth noting that he once called the legislation for which he now attacks McCain a "reasonable" proposal. In a 2005 interview with the Boston Globe after McCain's bill was introduced, Romney also said he didn't believe the legislation granted "amnesty."

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: Soldierinthesand @ 01/02/2008 3:28:47 AM

    Comment: Despite the fact that McCain is a war hero he has spent his career as a legislator. A whole life spent talkign without much action. Romney has shown through his leadership style that he is a doer. He has continually stood up and solved problems and actually made things happen. He is the type of leadership this country needs right now.

  • Posted By: Soldierinthesand @ 01/02/2008 3:26:19 AM

    Comment: McCain is a war hero, but on immigration he has flopped, Romney has a clearer track record of being able to make and enforce decisions that cleaned up messes like the 2002 winter Olympics Romney has been a doer that has made things happen, that's what our country needs. McCain has been a legislator, talk a lot and no action.

  • Posted By: MyViews1 @ 01/01/2008 7:19:40 AM

    Comment: Clearly a slanted story. McCain is not actually a bad guy, but lets face the fact that he cannot win the General Election...and Romney is the only GOP candidate who can. So get over it!

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Speedo's new and controversial high-tech LZR suit is helping swimmers smash dozens of records. How the company plans to capitalize on Olympic gold.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
AFRICA

These are among the ruling party's weapons against opposition voters. Still, the population clearly didn't cooperate in Friday's vote.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu