Slumber Party

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: klenz24 @ 01/03/2008 10:08:24 PM

    There is no reason to dis the democratic party. Everyone of us had a decision at 18 if we wanted to be democratic or republican. So instead of sitting there dissing the democratic party why don't you re-think something that is a little more important...urging the people that don't vote, TO vote. So then at least they would actually have the right to sit and complain about our president, if they wanted to.

  • Posted By: MikeReynolds @ 01/03/2008 9:41:16 PM

    Doesn't appear it's hurting Obama. Here are the results from Iowa at the moment:
    http://schlerplotti.typepad.com/quantworks/2008/01/trended-democra.html

  • Posted By: MikeReynolds @ 01/03/2008 9:39:56 PM

    Doesn't appear it's hurting Obama. Here are the results from Iowa at the moment:
    http://schlerplotti.typepad.com/quantworks/2008/01/trended-democra.html

  • Posted By: Winter360 @ 01/03/2008 9:11:09 PM

    Funny I read this soon after expressing to a friend that man, I wish we caucused in my state. Primaries are so boring - walk in, walk out, no interaction, no second vote. Whatever. I sometimes turn out for them. But caucusing?? That sounds worth getting a sitter - the opportunity to interact with other democratic voters, the freedom to pick the candidate I really like who will likely lose while getting to dicuss the merits of alternate candidates with members of my community. So the process is slow, it sounds like a great political exercise with others to whom the issues and election actually matter. Thanks so much for making me feel like a nerd in thinking a caucus sounds like an excellent way to spend an evening, lol.

  • Posted By: flype @ 01/03/2008 8:51:39 PM

    Comment to Mark11000,

    I totally agree with the first half of your comment. "Comment: The Iowa caucuses are not the key to anything but the vote of a few (8%) Iowans. Everyone in the US deserves the right to an equal vote. Let's stop this crazy, unfair primary system and have a real primary where everyone votes on the same day."

    27.million was spent on advertising alone to influence 150,000 caucus goers in Iowa. Something is tremendously wrong here. I would love to hear one candidate foregoing this hemorrhage of money and simply say that he/she are investing it towards the topic they promote.

    By the time this obscenity is over billions may well be spent. GAG!

    Canada does have a primary on the same day and a severe limitation on electioneering. Perhaps their system might work. At the very least they are able to sweep out TOTALLY previous administrations.... much more the Jerffersonian model.

    In WA state the electorate wrote an intitiative to end this caucus system. Both parties fought this outcome and it went to our Supreme Court. They ruled against the people, the same with a property tax limiitation. So much for the 'democratic process.'

    Secateur

  • Posted By: JMurph @ 01/03/2008 8:31:29 PM

    Forget the sophmoric word; collegiate references aside, I had wished to hear - especially in Iowa, some soundbite as to how the vast acreage of farmland could equate into America being less dependent upon foreign energy sources vis-a-vis ethanol from corn. Or wind turbines directly feeding into nearby grids. Or a multitude of other viable, green resources. Not one word surfaced to highight just how much Iowa could conceivably play a tremendous role as a energy provider for our Nation, not just some expansive feedlot with miles of wheat in between. We have already missed the ship - JMurph

  • Posted By: Mark11000 @ 01/03/2008 8:12:44 PM

    The Iowa caucuses are not the key to anything but the vote of a few (8%) Iowans. Everyone in the US deserves the right to an equal vote. Let's stop this crazy, unfair primary system and have a real primary where everyone votes on the same day.

  • Posted By: pbriggsiam @ 01/03/2008 6:52:38 PM

    Jonathan,

    I wonder if you could factor in the sophmoric way that the press corp handles these Iowa caucuses. For an understanding of what I'm getting at try this link:

    http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/01/03/hillary_bus/index.html

    I think Glen Greenwald has it right when he points out that the press corp dynamic fails to serve the people of this country. You and the rest of the press corp create your own "village" bubble and let the personal damage what should be informative reporting on serious aspects of each of the candidate's campaigns.

    Interested in doing a posting on this? Or would that make you an outsider with your fellow reporters in Iowa and DC?

    Regards,

    Patrick in Pasadena

  • Posted By: pbriggsiam @ 01/03/2008 6:52:21 PM

    Jonathan,

    I wonder if you could factor in the sophmoric way that the press corp handles these Iowa caucuses. For an understanding of what I'm getting at try this link:

    http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/01/03/hillary_bus/index.html

    I think Glen Greenwald has it right when he points out that the press corp dynamic fails to serve the people of this country. You and the rest of the press corp create your own "village" bubble and let the personal damage what should be informative reporting on serious aspects of each of the candidate's campaigns.

    Interested in doing a posting on this? Or would that make you an outsider with your fellow reporters in Iowa and DC?

    Regards,

    Patrick in Pasadena

  • Posted By: marvis @ 01/03/2008 6:44:34 PM

    go hillary, obama is loser

  • Posted By: willbarks @ 01/03/2008 6:19:21 PM

    I have firsthand experience with the caucus process, like making sausage it???s not a pretty sight but somewhat interesting for those involved???it brings people together in a public place where you have to act somewhat like a community???it is an open (very open) process but requires patience among its participants???it Is the patient who persevere and ultimately have the best chance do their best for the candidate of their choice. It is really democracy at its best (and therefore messiest) and I would hate to see it totally go away in favor of electronic balloting in the comfort of our laptops (for those who have them???there is always some discriminatory aspect in democracy but an electorate that is responsible from top to bottom and side to side will overcome such things as, working the night shift or worse the Orange Bowl). Don???t blame Iowans???blame the media for the hype it was never meant to be.

  • Posted By: flype @ 01/03/2008 5:47:08 PM

    RE: "Comment: You leave those troops right were they are. They are doing a job, killing all the people that you are afraid of. I mean after all they are soldiers are they not? Did they not sign up for that job of their own free will?"

    Let us not forget that some of these kids that we feel are old enough to die for their country can't even buy tobacco or liquor. Too young for dat! Add to these warriors are the illegals that we allow entry to the armed forces that after their service can become citizens. Very Roman, I dare say ... as is our imperialism.

    Not to forget the massive amount of pure unadulterated mercenaries like Black Hawk are immune to near any review by either the military or by the Iraqi govt.

    When the Romans occupied countries they at least stole the gold and the wheat, we simply spend a trillion a year to make our arms merchants and Halliburton???s richer. Does anyone even remember the cold war bonus that we would have when it ended?

    Ten trillion in debt that our kids will inherit, while some of the richest of us get tax credits _ _ _ way to go America.

    Secateur

  • Posted By: westdesmoiner @ 01/03/2008 5:29:11 PM

    Comment: I work in Des Moines for a fortune 500 company, I attend a church that has over 5000 members, the majority of the folks I talk to don't want to take the time to caucus, they'll wait till the November elections.
    So there are your throw away votes, those that won't bother to show.

    • Posted By: ikes @ 01/03/2008 5:40:07 PM

      How many choices will they have come November?

  • Posted By: JohnHerrera305 @ 01/03/2008 1:42:00 PM

    Why can't all states vote on the SAME day. Why should any one state have heavy influence on the Presidential nomination? Iowa is not representative of places like New York, Texas, Florida, California, etc. So why do the votes of a few thousand folks in corn country have soooooo much influence?
    I say hold all primaries and caucuses on the same day...Feb 5th!

    • Posted By: mrparmele @ 01/03/2008 5:34:03 PM

      If all the states voted on the same day, that would be called an ELECTION and we might have more than two choices for who gets to be president...just the way the founders wanted it...I say that's a great idea!!!

  • Posted By: lmoulton1 @ 01/03/2008 2:03:25 PM

    In this day and age of technology and 24 hour news stations, people need less time to decide who to vote for. We should all be able to determine a candidate by now. I agree with those saying hold all primaries and caucuses on the same day. I've seen more debates this year than in my lifetime and it's only January. To think we have to watch as the primaries happen in so many states before Pennsylvania gets a turn in April seems ridiculous. We also need to shorten this process so that candidates don't have to raise so much money. It's a waste.

    • Posted By: ikes @ 01/03/2008 4:48:37 PM

      You can not hold them all on the same day. How then would the candy-dates be able to change their message to please each State? Who then would feed the media all the potatoes that make them fat?

      • Posted By: mrparmele @ 01/03/2008 5:29:43 PM

        If we held all the primaries on the same day, it would be an election and we could have more than just two candidates running for President...the way the Founders wrote it...great idea

  • Posted By: mayercoup @ 01/03/2008 4:05:10 PM

    It's a great way to pick our presidents...I'm also thinking there are 150,000 troops in Iraq would would be glad to switch places with me....
    *****
    Yet we won't let a single one of our troops from Iowa vote in the caucus by absentee ballot. Why don't we let the troops speak for themselves? Why are we afraid of giving them that chance?

    • Posted By: ikes @ 01/03/2008 5:22:05 PM

      You leave those troops right were they are. They are doing a job, killing all the people that you are afraid of. I mean after all they are soldiers are they not? Did they not sign up for that job of their own free will?

  • Posted By: rlbarton @ 01/03/2008 1:37:49 PM

    This election process started a year ago. The person with enough desire to show up should already know who they support. I find it hard to believe anyone could be persuaded to change their vote at the last minute. The whole system should be moved to something like July 2008 so we don't have to listen constantly to the same points be made. Also, all states should vote at the same time so they have a say. By time the bigger states (i.e. Texas and California) get their chance it's already decided.

    • Posted By: ikes @ 01/03/2008 5:02:11 PM

      You do not have to listen to the same points being made. They change from State to State.

    • Posted By: JohnHerrera305 @ 01/03/2008 1:49:18 PM

      Totally agree!

      • Posted By: szdreamer @ 01/03/2008 4:17:24 PM

        Totally agree as well. I have been searching for arguments that adequately support the existence of caucuses and I've yet to find any. I can appreciate the idea of grass roots, hosting dialogues, debates, taking your time to educate yourself and cast your vote, etc. However, I cannot for the life of me understand why we wouldn't all do that, then place our vote in a primary on the same day across the nation so it truly is the vote of the people. So much simpler, fulfills the need for a democratic voice of all Americans, saves lots of money, and creates an equal playing field for everyone... doesn't it? Sigh...... many things in this country I "just don't get..."

  • Posted By: flype @ 01/03/2008 4:56:22 PM

    The ghost print suggested that I wasn't logged in, so I didn't quite finish.
    This primary and ghastly electoral system need to be scrapped. The editor did not mention the super-delegates that finally participate in the picking of the state electors. These often equal and sometimes exceed those elected by the caucus debacle. In Montana it is even more anti-democratic.

    In the final election I also propose being able to vote 1,2,3,4 and to be able to pick a Democrat, Rebublican or Independent as I see fit to run the country. It might create a split executive, but this country seemed to bumble along quite nicely allowing such outcomes. This Democratic or Republican only choice is rather a recent invention and exists primarily to prevent third parties.

    IMO we strongly need a third party!

    Secateur

  • Posted By: flype @ 01/03/2008 4:47:29 PM

    As a former caucus chair and a state delegate I finally quit. In WA. state the procedure is much the same for the Republicans as well. This is an old boys network that prevent spoilers from taking over from the state run political machine. It is totally undemocratic and the last person left standing often does not reflect the original counts. Four years ago Kucinich and Wesley Clark were so eliminated. What the editor does not mention is that those delegates then go on to another regional caucus were the 15 percent rule continues. Small counties and or rural areas usually succumb to the powerful numbers of the urban centers. By the time you get to Seattle, most of eastern W A. or my Olympic Peninsula delegates have been eliminated.
    Same for the resolutions!

    I would much prefer an open vote with a first and second choice being allowed Points being given for first and less for second place. The winner is the one with the highest toal.

    Secateur

  • Posted By: nanoreid @ 01/03/2008 1:50:58 PM

    Here's a great way to streamline a cacus...Don't have one! Why is this method still allowed by law? Why should I care what a bunch of cornfed flatlanders think. Here's a thought, have the first primary held in Virginia. After all, more presidents have come from this Commonwealth than any other state in the union. Considering that I have seen most if not all of the campaigning being done in Iowa, I think we could hold the primary tomorrow and most folks here would be able to cast a well informed vote.

    • Posted By: angelica915 @ 01/03/2008 3:04:48 PM

      Nanoreid you are wrong...Ohio has had the most Presidents, but besides that, I agree with you 100%, the caucus' are archaic, it is time Iowa came into the 21st Century and held primaries like every state does..

      As to what the state of Iowa thinks is important,...I really don't pay any attention to it. What do I care who the people of Iowa are voting for, I have my own thoughts, plus just because you're first, does not mean you are right.

      • Posted By: brianinva @ 01/03/2008 3:24:56 PM

        Ohio? Some fact-checking may be in order.

        • Posted By: angelica915 @ 01/03/2008 4:21:10 PM

          Oops you're right...I didn't count Woodrow Wilson. Virginia 8 - Ohio 7

      • Posted By: Aaron61808 @ 01/03/2008 3:22:12 PM

        angelica915, please know your history before you correct others. 8 presidents were born in Virginia and 7 in Ohio. Virginia has had the most presidents since our third president, Thomas Jefferson, became the 2nd from the Commonwealth.

        • Posted By: brianinva @ 01/03/2008 3:26:31 PM

          Ohio. Some fact-checking may be in order. When you mis-state facts, it makes it hard to take your other comments seriously.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse