EDUCATION

Getting In Gets Harder

The children of the baby boomers are flooding colleges with applications, making the process more competitive than ever.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: mars6789 @ 05/03/2008 1:54:07 PM

    A good editorial http://www.socyberty.com/Education/College-Admissions-for-the-Middle-Class.108615

  • Posted By: mars6789 @ 05/03/2008 1:52:47 PM

    http://www.socyberty.com/Education/College-Admissions-for-the-Middle-Class.108615

  • Posted By: Norabarnacle @ 04/22/2008 12:09:39 PM

    I don't understand all of this crying over university admissions when there is such a shortage of skilled tradespeople. My husband is a master electrician...he owns his own business which handles million dollar contracts. Why aren' some of these kids trying to become electricians, plumbers, carpenters, mill-wrights etc. God knows we don't need anymore lawyers!!!!

    • Posted By: wolfpoet @ 05/02/2008 12:53:04 PM

      Enter Your CommentI think it's sad that colleges are becoming picker with each passing year. It's hard enough for poor kids and lower middle class kids to afford college, much less high school. Scholarships and even Fasfa have intrest on them so you gotta pay back all that money you borrowed after you graduate college and get a job. Teaching for example now requires a master degree which means you can teach with a bachelor's but you gotta go to school for 4 more years to get the "required" degree. Even with a master degree teachers are paid virtually little money for all the work they have to do and putting up with smart aleck kids. I know me for example can't go to college since my religion forbids using intrests which means I can't take out a loan or fafsa to go to college. I do think kids need to realize that they can't get into all the colleges they choose and it's important for parents to make their kids see that it's virtually impossible unless your rich or upper middle class to afford the full tuition for 4 years without taking out loans.

  • Posted By: wolfpoet @ 05/02/2008 12:52:47 PM

    I think it's sad that colleges are becoming picker with each passing year. It's hard enough for poor kids and lower middle class kids to afford college, much less high school. Scholarships and even Fasfa have intrest on them so you gotta pay back all that money you borrowed after you graduate college and get a job. Teaching for example now requires a master degree which means you can teach with a bachelor's but you gotta go to school for 4 more years to get the "required" degree. Even with a master degree teachers are paid virtually little money for all the work they have to do and putting up with smart aleck kids. I know me for example can't go to college since my religion forbids using intrests which means I can't take out a loan or fafsa to go to college. I do think kids need to realize that they can't get into all the colleges they choose and it's important for parents to make their kids see that it's virtually impossible unless your rich or upper middle class to afford the full tuition for 4 years without taking out loans.

  • Posted By: wolfpoet @ 05/02/2008 12:52:37 PM

    I think it's sad that colleges are becoming picker with each passing year. It's hard enough for poor kids and lower middle class kids to afford college, much less high school. Scholarships and even Fasfa have intrest on them so you gotta pay back all that money you borrowed after you graduate college and get a job. Teaching for example now requires a master degree which means you can teach with a bachelor's but you gotta go to school for 4 more years to get the "required" degree. Even with a master degree teachers are paid virtually little money for all the work they have to do and putting up with smart aleck kids. I know me for example can't go to college since my religion forbids using intrests which means I can't take out a loan or fafsa to go to college. I do think kids need to realize that they can't get into all the colleges they choose and it's important for parents to make their kids see that it's virtually impossible unless your rich or upper middle class to afford the full tuition for 4 years without taking out loans.

  • Posted By: wolfpoet @ 05/02/2008 12:51:40 PM

    I think it's sad that colleges are becoming picker with each passing year. It's hard enough for poor kids and lower middle class kids to afford college, much less high school. Scholarships and even Fasfa have intrest on them so you gotta pay back all that money you borrowed after you graduate college and get a job. Teaching for example now requires a master degree which means you can teach with a bachelor's but you gotta go to school for 4 more years to get the "required" degree. Even with a master degree teachers are paid virtually little money for all the work they have to do and putting up with smart aleck kids. I know me for example can't go to college since my religion forbids using intrests which means I can't take out a loan or fafsa to go to college. I do think kids need to realize that they can't get into all the colleges they choose and it's important for parents to make their kids see that it's virtually impossible unless your rich or upper middle class to afford the full tuition for 4 years without taking out loans.

  • Posted By: DaveGravity @ 01/24/2008 5:44:41 PM

    What's ironic about all this is that I make more than many people with Bachelor degrees my age (30) and I have a GED.

    Why is this? It's because the education system is antiquated and ridiculously expensive.

    During the 4+ years these kids are at school NOT working or gaining useable work experience they're running up a huge bill they have to pay later...unless mom and dad or a full scholarship is paying for it.

    That's not to mention the fact that the education system has been dumbing itself down in order to make test scores look decent or the fact that most schools are consistently about 10 years behind with what they're teaching in most career-related fields.

    Now add the fact that few people ever make a career out of the field they majored in during college.

    What does this mean? It means it's turned itself into a joke. I'm multilingual (Portuguese, Spanish, coming up on Japanese, and English of course) with almost no official schooling in any of my languages. I have a bigger vocabulary, better grammar and higher reading comprehension than most graduates my age. All this despite doing relatively poorly in school as a kid.

    Why? It's not because I'm particularly gifted or intelligent. It's because these people are relying on a broken system to get a free ride to their dream job with a piece of paper. Unfortunately the job market is much more competative than it was in the late 90s during the dot com bubble and pretend booming economy. A Bachelor's Degree is the new High School Diploma...but actual experience and a solid resume trumps that in many cases.

    The very system that should be warning us about the problems we're about to face as a crumbling empire is broken itself.

    • Posted By: shah mat @ 02/19/2008 12:17:54 PM



      Actually, that system IS warning Americans. But of course, if you aren't actually present in class to actually receive that particular emergency broadcast, you aren't necessarily going to make for the best 'receptor' then, are you? The PROBLEM is that all college-bound prospectives,whether young or old, are generally seeking to attend the U.S. educational sytem for all the wrong reasons. Far from actually taking in knowledge for knowledges own sake to then, I don't know... maybe APPLY the knowledge, if any, that they receive, their brief relationship and encounter with the educational system is only, and I repeat, ONLY done so that they can eventually command higher capital. Though, I guess, you don't have to actually have been present in class to see that 'capitalism' in its present form ain't not the answer.

      • Posted By: mountain_laurel1183 @ 03/31/2008 3:00:22 PM

        Yeah, that sounds very nice indeed, but if you need a license for your career, then you can pretty much kiss your "experience" idealism away. That pretty much only works in the business world, and even then, not always. And for good reason--no offense, but I wouldn't want a dr with just a GED to perform surgery on me.

        Although I do agree with much of what you said, I also agree that the problem tends to be that people tend to go to college for the wrong reasons.

  • Posted By: allenels @ 03/29/2008 6:10:44 PM

    Unfortunately, as a private tutor and a mom,I disagree that going to college is just an exercise in learning how to live with-in a budget and a place to learn from your mistakes. College life today is way different than when I attended. It's not suffiecient for any student to graduate with just a BA or a BS. Most students know that they have to go to a compettive graduate institution and getting into good graduate programs require more than life experience enhancement in college.

    Attending college, like living life is extremely competitive and a laissez faire attitude won't help.

  • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 03/29/2008 11:55:23 AM

    Getting into college is easy.
    Getting into a "good" college is harder.

    It is this notion of a "good" college that is the problem.

    When my daughter and the rest of her friends were applying to colleges, I told them it doesn't matter where you go to college. I doesn't even really matter much what you major in - the majority of people I know ended up in careers that had little or nothing to do with what they majored in.

    it doesn't matter where you get your degree, or what you get it in. What matters is that you recognize college for what it is - a 4-year learning lab for adulthood.

    We think we are sending our kids to college for an academic education, and yes, they usually end up with one. But the real reason we send them is to learn to become a grown-up - to learn to live within a budget, to learn to get along with others who don't look or think like them, to learn about cause and effect, and most important, to become responsible for one's self and one's actions.

    In other words, we send them to college to make mistakes, and learn from them.

    If we can help our kids understand what the real goal of going to college is - to learn to live lfe on life's terms - we'll go a long way towards relieving a lot of anxiety that shouldn't be there in the first place.

    Don't worry so much about getting into a "good" college. Concentrate on finding the college that is "good" for you.

  • Posted By: greling @ 01/07/2008 12:09:35 PM

    Well, too bad. Boo-who! You didn't think getting into college was a "right" did ya? College is not for everyone and not everyone was meant for the academy. I'm actually glad this is a happening, as it will mean higher standards for diploma recipients. When I was attending undergrad I was amazed at the kind of people they'd even let in there. With increased competition maybe we can stop the dumbing down of the academy.

    • Posted By: shah mat @ 02/19/2008 12:22:41 PM

      You know... never mind.

  • Posted By: stop the hype @ 02/08/2008 2:40:42 PM

    This article joins the slew of others that are intended to hype up the anxiety of wealthy applicants in order to support the cottage industry associated with reducing the distress--tutors/coaches, books and articles on how to get into college. Newsweek itslef is highly motivated to increase the angst because the angst propells the wealthy to buy their college guides and the magazine tiself, that has multiple rankings associaed with colleges. The more hype the more Newsweeks fly off the shelves. In fact, there are plenty of terrific schools that are not part of the hype and that are accessible to students. Also, studies have shown that it is the students that the hyped schools attract,, rather than the education that they provide, that accounts for subsequent success of the Ivy graduates. Studies comparing students who got offers but turned down Harvard in favor of other less expensive less hyped schools, did just as well post graduate as those that went. Yes, these schools produce students who are successful but those students would be successful if you kept them in a box for 4 years and taught them nothing.

  • Posted By: atomicatomic @ 01/04/2008 12:56:17 PM

    Children of Baby boomers are in high school and junior high? Are you serious? Lets look at the facts. The baby boomers were born between 1946-1965. Currently, they would be 42-62 years old. The age of students in question is between 12-18 (grades 7-12). This means that baby boomers would have had to have given birth between the ages of 24-50. The average age American mothers had their first child was around 21 during that period. The average age that the mothers in question would have had to have given birth is 37. Now, we are looking at a difference in age of 21 and 37!!! The baby-boomers children have almost all already graduated from college. Most baby boomers are becoming grandparents right now. The percentage of baby boomers with children still in high school and junior high is very small. Granted, there are some, but the vast majority have already seen their kids finish college. To blame this surge on baby boomers is retardedly ignorant. The only baby boomers with kids this age are going to be those born in mid-60s who gave birth later in life. This surge is due to something else entirely, namely the fact that a greater percentage of high school students want to go to college. It used to be that only the smart kdis went to college. Now, unless you went to a vocational high school, college has just become 13th grade - it's the next step - it's what you do after high school - if you don't go, everyone will make fun of you. Also, a far greater percentage of women are going to college now. This is not due to the fact that there are more students. This is due to the fact that more students want to go and the fact that people are applying to more college. Whoever wrote this article needs to send in an application and join the ranks of these students in question, because he/she obviously didn't finish the first time.

    • Posted By: greling @ 01/07/2008 12:17:35 PM

      I am a member of the second- "Baby Boom" generation, called "Echo Boomers" by generationalist specialists. We are the grandchildren of the original Baby Boomers, born in the mid-80's and early 90's. Maybe the author got these two confused. And yes, admission is hard, but I don't have a problem with that. Competition is healthy for the academy and college is not a "right" but a privilege that must be earned.

      • Posted By: FairyFace22 @ 02/02/2008 10:41:31 PM

        Good for you! I'd like to see YOU compete these days. Even if you've 'earned' the privilege, that doesn't mean that you'll get it. Competition is important but what is happening today is equivalent to 'enie menie minie mo' because you see hundreds of students who look equally good and selection becomes arbitrary. Getting in is very often beyond one's influence. Getting into college should be about merit, not luck.

    • Posted By: mary mac @ 01/07/2008 11:52:23 AM

      I was born in 1956 and have an 11 and a 15 year old. There are lots of boomer men who became fathers in their 40s and even 50s. Most women who went to college and graduate school had kids between 29 and 40. I think the average age that women get married is about 23. They usually need to save for a few years for a down payment, so lots of women didn't have kids until their late 20s or early 20s.
      Mary Mac

    • Posted By: iforeplay @ 01/05/2008 1:10:05 AM

      I agree atomicatomic.........As I stated in my posted comment here I believe 57" was the peak of the BOOMERS birth rate in this nation. and YES my kids are already thru college and I am a grandfather.
      You may have been a bit strong on the retarded IGNORANCE of the author of this but your RIGHT ON
      with the logic behind your comment . In a way WE as boomers fought for jobs and housing and many
      other NEEDS because of our numbers overwhelming the SYSTEM.......................

    • Posted By: Kris @ 01/04/2008 2:29:46 PM

      I was born in 1959 and have two children in middle school -- and am not in the least atypical. Can you please cite your source for your statistics?

  • Posted By: tschiggfrie @ 01/24/2008 12:39:44 PM


    This article may have left readers with an inaccurate impression about Washington and Lee University. The institution is, in fact, one of the most selective liberal arts colleges in the U.S.



    Since 1994, the average high school percentile rank of Washington and Lee's first-year students has been 90 percent or higher, meaning that the average first-year student then was in the top 10 percent or higher of his or her high school class. Recent years have seen that number climb to the 92nd and 93rd percentiles.



    Over the same period, Washington and Lee admitted only 36 percent maximum of applicants. The last two years were the most competitive in our 259-year history, when we admitted only 27 percent both years.



    Further facts can be found at the Washington and Lee Web site, with all the statistics on first-year admission trends: http://ir.wlu.edu/factbook/admissions/trends.htm.

  • Posted By: Ed Reed @ 01/23/2008 9:01:28 AM

    Don't we just need more elite colleges?

  • Posted By: madeleine shohat @ 01/06/2008 11:29:35 PM

    Bravo Rayanne1! If they can't grasp the most simple aspects of grammer what makes them think they can write a college English paper?

  • Posted By: wolfie672 @ 01/04/2008 7:35:14 AM

    So I noticed that many college applicants who's parents have paid taxes in this country porobably for generations,and have helped build up the university institutions in this country are rejected, while universities actively recruit foreign students. What a croc.

    • Posted By: rayanne1 @ 01/05/2008 11:26:11 PM

      Well wolfie672, maybe the nice white kids don't get into college because they don't know how to use the English language properly. In the mere two sentances you wrote, you have used "who's" incorrectly (it should be "whose") and misspelled "croc" (should be "crock" since it's short for a crock of sh*t, crock being a type of container in case you weren't aware). Y'all need to go back to middle school and study before you apply to college.

      • Posted By: greling @ 01/07/2008 12:40:21 PM

        LOL! English major? Even I didn't know that a "crock" was some kind of container! :)

  • Posted By: Harry Toder @ 01/03/2008 9:34:53 PM

    Selectivity might be an indication of quality, but there are many v ariables: Rather than just try for the most selective school, high school students should try to determine the best "fit" between themselves and the school. They should definitely visit the schools they are most interested in, and talk to some of the key faculty.

    The truth is that students can get a great education at many places, and should not "put all of their eggs in one basket", namely, the most selective, prestigious college or university.

    Harry Toder, Springfield, Ky.

    • Posted By: sstachur @ 01/04/2008 1:05:20 PM

      This is so true. Many high school students don't want to go to community colleges because they have a bad rap. However, there are also many high school students who have no clue what they want to do with their lives and a community college would ultimately be the best fit for them. I watched many of my friends with to career ambition apply to and attend a 4 year university only to drop out when they realized it wasn't right for them. Only then, did they realize that they needed to start a the beginning and figure out a general direction in which wished to go, and then create a plan that included an advanced degree.

      • Posted By: greling @ 01/07/2008 12:36:37 PM

        The whole anti-community college thing is crazy. I transferred to a selective school after attending a community college. I thought it would be stigmatizing. In fact, I was perceived by peers as more diverse and smarter. And, funny thing is that I transfered alongside rich kids. Two of the students I transfered in with during my junior year were children of celebrities. The other's dad was the CEO of the Salvation Army.

  • Posted By: Beentheredonethat @ 01/03/2008 10:14:30 PM

    Don't pay attention to the slick marketing and manipulation by the so-called "highly selective" colleges. You stand no better a chance at success than someone who goes to a good State University. These colleges are no longer interested in your education. They are only interested in your money. This is big business. They are not educators anymore, they are marketers who will say or do just about anything to get your money.

    Save your money, go to a less expensive school and show these phony "educators" that we all can see through the hype!

    • Posted By: greling @ 01/07/2008 12:33:34 PM

      Actually, what you are paying for in these ultra-selective schools is a key to the upper echelons of the social strata. People kill themselves over getting such degrees because it means that they'll have the possibility of establishing a wider network of the "It's who you know" category with prestigious alumni (U.S. Senators, presidents, lawyers, etc.) . Whether or not a person properly takes advantage of this is another story.

  • Posted By: created_animator @ 01/04/2008 4:09:44 AM

    Being a student at Yale, I can say this with some degree of confidence and assurity-- College is a small impetus towards who you will become or where you want to be. Its not the place but it is what the students who make of the place. An institutution like Yale became one because its students were committed to excellence.

    For those who do not get into the colleges of their choice, do not get diheartened. Your time is now. Grab any opportunity you get, make the most of it, follow your dreams and strive towards excellence. Give in your best shot, so that after graduating you don't regret not having made the most of it

    • Posted By: DANVET57 @ 01/04/2008 9:00:23 AM

      EVERYONE GIVES IT THEIR BEST SHOT ''BUT'' YALE, HARVARD AND THEM OTHER IVY LEAGUE SCHOOLS ARE OUT OF TOUCH UNLESS YOU ARE FILTHY RICH OR POLITICALLY CONNECTED LIKE THAT BLOOMING IDIOT IN THE WHITE HOUSE - AS WE ALL KNOW.

      • Posted By: greling @ 01/07/2008 12:28:55 PM

        Bush didn't "graduate" from Yale. He was "socially promoted". :)

  • Posted By: Mwalimu @ 01/06/2008 10:55:29 PM

    The focus of this article represents what???s wrong with America. For the rich white kids or the kids in the upper middle class, the results are ginger peachy. What about the non-rich and the non-white? Colleges are getting more expensive. We???re cutting back on financial aid to needy students. Inner city schools are over-crowded and crumbling. But a solution is in sight. Just send military recruiters to inner city high schools and promise college scholarships. Military recruiters even promise automatic citizenship for children of the undocumented. Of course the military does not tell its inner city recruits that they will not get full college tuition. Many Iraq war veterans are finding this out the hard way when they return. Furthermore, if poor kids do manage to get into college, they frequently find themselves saddled with tens of thousands of dollars in student debt - something children from well-heeled families don???t face Something is wrong here. First of all the rich in this country should send their kids over to Iraq to fight - this would reduce the college crunch. Secondly we need to tax the rich so more of the poor can go to college instead going to Iraq. We need to equalize the playing field.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse