TECHNOLOGY

The Greening of CES

Is this year's Consumer Electronics Show going to be the largest carbon-neutral event in the world?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Larryow @ 01/10/2008 2:33:16 PM

    In the book ???The World is Flat??? Tom Friedman asks for a vigorous plan to counter global warming. He suggests the Apollo moon landing program as the model for an energy development program.

    This note is to alert you to the publication of my book ???Global Warming Can Be Conquered??? (ISBN 07 414 426 8 X). This book answers Mr. Friedman???s request.

    In the book I justify the need for, and outline an ambitious plan for a new energy infrastructure called the Renewable- Fusion-Hydrogen (RFH) Energy System. This system offers TOTAL elimination of the emission of fossil carbon by 2050. It is NOT the 80% reduction by 2050, currently under discussion. The 80% reduction in carbon dioxide may slow warming but is inadequate to protect the biosphere for more than a few decades. RFH Energy System has the potential to push critical warming off for several centuries and in the interim provides all nations with energy independence.

    My goal is to develop world wide interest in implementing the RFH Energy System. If you think the RFH Energy System makes sense please help me promote it by encouraging everyone you know to support its implementation. You can help by simply forward this note to everyone on your contact list, or if you buy the book lend it to others.

    We must commence dramatic reduction in the emission of carbon dioxide within the next few years. If you have an alternate plan, promote it and if it is better than RFH energy I will help promote your system. We need to act!

    You can review a brief outline of the system on my web site at:

    www.endtoglobalwarming.com

    You can send me a note at my e-mail address lowilliams@msn.com

    or place one on my blog at:

    http://energyindependence.home.services.spaces.live.com/default.aspx

    You can buy the book ???Global Warming Can Be Conquered??? (ISBN 07 414 426 8 X) from the publisher for $19.95 at: www.bbotw.com

  • Posted By: levee4u @ 01/06/2008 11:18:54 PM

    Carbon offsets are a great way to reduce your climate impact and help us make clean energy cost less than dirty energy. If you are going to get in a plane, for whatever reason, you have a carbon footprint. If you turn on the lights in your home, heat your home or commute to work on a subway, you have a climate impact. If you eat food or wear clothes or use a computer for work that were made with energy, you have a carbon footprint.
    And that gives you choices: do something or do nothing. Carbon offsets empower people to do have a positive impact against global warming.

  • Posted By: levee4u @ 01/06/2008 11:09:00 PM

    I am glad to see CES showing such leadership on global warming, which threatens all of us. We need to reduce our emissions as much as possible but we also need to work, travel and live, so doing so in as green a way as possible is vital and CES is showing how we can do both. It just makes sense that if you are going to cause emissions from something you need to do, you would reduce emissions somewhere else, like with wind energy or energy efficiency.

    I was pumped to read about all the new green products using recycled materials and less energy. We need to attack this from multiple angles.

  • Posted By: phiomalibumalibu @ 01/06/2008 9:30:43 PM

    Perhaps research in better and cheaper solar technology is in order. I am planning on getting a rebate of $23,000 in California for my home solar system -- ecohouseinfo.com has all the info and plans plus information on the rebates, each state is different I think.

  • Posted By: bostmaguy @ 01/06/2008 2:23:21 PM

    Buying carbon offsets is quite possibly the most ingenious Ponzi scheme being celebrated by the media. At the top is Algore. The CES should take that big pile of cash and give it to a struggling African nation for food, water, or whatever it needs. As it stands the CES is taking its money and literally putting a match to it and watching it burn. This is the trickle-down effect when a green politician turned faux-scientist gets on his pulpit and starts using his position and namesake to advance his own spurious beliefs, simultaneously prevaricating his way into getting a treacly peace prize.

  • Posted By: gitane @ 01/06/2008 12:36:29 PM

    this is all b******t how can "paying" for something get rid of the problem. As a matter of fact I think they are increasing the carbon footprint. How you ask, simple the organization needs offices, needs calculaters to operate or even better computers ( which are outdated months after sold) printers, ink, paper, and let us not forget the electricity to run the office. (electricity which is produced by burning fossil fuel). Furthermore the employees that drive to work or take public transportation and so on. In my opinion the only way to deminish the footprint is to consume less, less electronics (which are produced whith plastics) less useless travel, less driving ( 10 miles or so, out of your way to save a couple of dollars). All in all our habits have to change.

  • Posted By: skcolo @ 01/06/2008 11:51:07 AM

    agree with Posha. Hows does the carbon offset company offset their carbon by the energy used to travel, build facilities, plant trees, and their employees to commute to work, etc. How does the oil that is burned get replenished? And what makes these ppeople so arrogant to that they somehow know just what the perfect temperature for earth is anyway. What a scam!ppeo

  • Posted By: skcolo @ 01/06/2008 11:50:16 AM

    I agree with Posha. Hows does the carbon offset company offset their carbon by the energy used to travel, build facilities, plant trees, and their employees to commute to work, etc. How does the oil that is burned get replenished? And what makes these ppeople so arrogant to that they somehow know just what the perfect temperature for earth is anyway. What a scam!ppeo

  • Posted By: Posha @ 01/06/2008 10:31:36 AM

    How can people generally smart and well educated and able to create and use high tech wonders possibly believe that paying money to some charlatan will somehow "offset" their "carbon?" Even if this were possible, isn't the carbon offset company limited in any way? Or are they magically able to "offset" an infinite amount of carbon? And if there are limits then the "waste" or "excess" is simply using up more of the finite "offsetting" capacity. This presumes the inanity of believing that it matters somehow how much "carbon" you make.

  • Posted By: phiomalibumalibu @ 01/05/2008 11:59:24 PM

    I think it is going to be fun to attend this year. I found some great gps gadgets at x-vision.net And I also found some really cool stuff at braintechs.com I'm looking forward to the show and hope to see you there =)

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse