The Pilot vs. The Preacher

Go Huckabee!!! What a delight to have a real person running for the nomination.

Sorry for the THREE posts. It's a good thing I'M not running for President. :)

Huckabee has been way more nasty to Romney than Romney's comparison/record ads. Huckabee can't answer to his record that's why he avoids it and talks 'half-truths' like he accuses Romney of. That publicity stunt of taking the high road-- that 'cancelled' ad was filled with 'half-truth' that wrongly reflected Romney's position. He didn't go through all the details behind the $50 for abortions that was a court mandate opposed by Romney but was the LAW in MA and yet he whined that Romney is vicious for exposing his record. The Huckster isn't fooling anyone that isn't an absolute FOOL. McCain's ads are the same as Romney's. They all talked about how to stop immigrants from coming in, but they all avoided telling us what they would really do about all the illegals that are currently here-- draining our ecomony and social programs. Romney is the only one really serious about irradicating the problem. Romney is making distinctions between candidates-- the Republican's better pull their heads out or we'll have a Democratic, soon to be socialistic America, on our hands.

Huckabee has been way more nasty to Romney than Romney's comparison/record ads. Huckabee can't answer to his record that's why he avoids it and talks 'half-truths' like he accuses Romney of. That publicity stunt of taking the high road-- that 'cancelled' ad was filled with 'half-truth' that wrongly reflected Romney's position. He didn't go through all the details behind the $50 for abortions that was a court mandate opposed by Romney but was the LAW in MA and yet he whined that Romney is vicious for exposing his record. The Huckster isn't fooling anyone that isn't an absolute FOOL. McCain's ads are the same as Romney's. They all talked about how to stop immigrants from coming in, but they all avoided telling us what they would really do about all the illegals that are currently here-- draining our ecomony and social programs. Romney is the only one really serious about irradicating the problem. Romney is making distinctions between candidates-- the Republican's better pull their heads out or we'll have a Democratic, soon to be socialistic America, on our hands.

Why not both? I think a Huckabee/McCain presidency would be quite fabulous... although it probably wouldn't make for very aestetically pleasing bumpter stickers

Boo hoo! Why even try to be good. Why not be the worst we can, since this is our natural tendency. All things good and decent are fake. Aren't we after all monkeys with suits on!. Watch Huckabee show what authenticity and progress is ...

If Huckabee and McCain end up the frontrunners, my prediction is that they will both continue praising each other while underhandedly causing harm to the campaigns.

All campaigners have their dark secrets revealed. Everyone has dark secrets - it just so happens that they're not publically broadcast to the entire nation, if not hte entire world. People make mistakes and lose their tempers. It happens.

I agree more with Republicans on where they stand with their views, but the democratic party knows what 'progress' means. Though the vast majority of America is religious, I do believe with the democratic candidates acknowledging their religious views that they may earn a seat in the White House, but it'll be close. There seem to be no strong, hardball Republicans, yet we criticize Hillary for being too tough and stubborn.

Hypocrites? Maybe. But perhaps we should instead take into consideration one's overall character, not the facade they put on, not just the nasty things that come out of their backgrounds. Who would you want running the country? One with morals. One with a grounded mind. One who isn't afraid to stand up for their country in times of need.

A leader serves. Who would be the best servant? Let's think instead about that and not the past, not what's happened back then.

Huckabee and the Republican party are a lose lose situation.
Either Huckabee loses or the Republican party loses.
If Huckabee wins, the Republicans lose because they will forever be branded a party
of fanatical Religious zelots. With no consideration for anything like a "Broad Reagan style coalition".
If Huckabee loses, the Republican party wins because it keeps its "Big tent" togather.
Any party, Republican or Democrat, needs a broad coalition to win.
Also, I do not think the "Value voters" are going to rebel against
the Republican party, they are not going to vote Democrat in large numbers. They can sit out
elections, but with, that they give up any piece of the political pie.
Huckabee as a nominee or VP would be a disaster for an already
fragmented Republican party.
Same can be said for McCain, add that he's status quo and out of date.