Hillary Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOYcM1z5fTs
HILLARY 08
Hillary Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOYcM1z5fTs
HILLARY 08
Hillary Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOYcM1z5fTs
HILLARY 08
Hillary Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOYcM1z5fTs
HILLARY 08
Hillary Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOYcM1z5fTs
HILLARY 08
Hillary Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOYcM1z5fTs
HILLARY 08
N.H. Debate: The Dems' Turn
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
We've called Clinton on this once before. It's true that the Energy Policy Act of 2005 contained $14.3 billion in tax breaks, but most of those breaks were for electric utilities, nuclear power plants, alternative fuels research and subsidies for energy efficient cars and homes. In fact, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, the $2.6 billion in tax breaks for oil companies was offset by $2.9 billion in tax increases. The net was a $300 million tax increase over 11 years.
Double the Health Spending? Not Quite.
Obama repeated an old chestnut about health care costs:
Obama: Our medical care costs twice as much per capita as any other advanced nation.
This is an exaggeration. The United States does spend nearly twice as much on average as most developed nations, but it is inaccurate to say that it spends twice as much as "any other." In a 2007 Kaiser Family Foundation report comparing the health care spending of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries, the United States came in first at $5,711 per capita. But Luxembourg spent $4,611, only $1,100 less per capita than the U.S. The next biggest spender, Switzerland, spent $3,874, also far more than half of U.S. spending. France's per capita spending was $3,048, still more than half of the costs in this country. KFF noted, however, that the United States' spending was "over 90% higher than in many other countries that we would consider global competitors."
Bring the Troops Home. Now. Sort Of.
Clinton said she sees no reason U.S. troops should remain in Iraq "beyond today," but she also has said U.S. troops could remain in some combat roles in Iraq for several years.
Clinton: So it's time to bring our troops home and to bring them home as quickly and responsibly as possible and unfortunately, I don't see any reason why they should remain beyond, you know, today. I think George Bush doesn't intend to bring them home, but certainly I have said when I'm president I will. Within 60 days, I'll start that withdrawal.










Discuss