N.H. Debate: The Dems' Turn

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Obama: Just this week, when I was asked, would I have voted for the $87 billion dollars, I said "no." I said no unequivocally because, at a certain point, we have to say no to George Bush. If we keep on getting steamrolled, we are not going to stand a chance.

Four years later Obama attempted to add context to his New Trier remarks in this May 2007 interview on ABC's "This Week," saying he supported $67 billion of the $87 billion since that money was directed to the troops:

George Stephanopoulos: But back in 2003, you were against supplemental funding for the war. You gave a speech where you said I would vote against the $87 billion.
Obama: That is true. … And the reason was because I was trying to establish a principle at that time and I said this at the time that for us to be giving $20 billion in reconstruction dollars in a no-bid process where money could potentially be wasted was a problem. But what I also said at that time was that the 67 billion that was needed for the troops was something that I would gladly vote for and I've been consistent in saying that as much as I think this has been if not the biggest then one of the biggest foreign policy blunders in history, I want to make sure that our troops who are on the ground who perform magnificently aren't caught in the political cross fire in Washington.

It's true Obama had made the distinction, but we were unable to find any evidence that he made it in his New Trier speech or that it was as detailed as he claims. Neither the Obama campaign nor the New Trier Democrats could provide a transcript. He did make this distinction in an October 2003 NAACP forum, according to this report from The Hyde Park Citizen, a local Illinois paper:

Hyde Park Citizen: Obama said he would put more money toward the troops, but not rebuilding Iraq. "We need to make sure that every dollar that is spent in Iraq is spent at home," he said. "We could have had our allies paying for [their] building process and contributing to the troops."

But Obama has since voted in favor of Iraq war funding, as has Clinton, on at least 14 separate occasions. Those bills have included a number of line-items ranging from funding for Iraqi reconstruction – the type of funding Obama said he would vote against – to unrelated activities such as tsunami relief and Hurricane Katrina recovery.

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: bharvey @ 01/10/2008 3:22:47 PM

    Comment: Hillary Documentary
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOYcM1z5fTs

    HILLARY 08

    Hillary Documentary
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOYcM1z5fTs

    HILLARY 08

    Hillary Documentary
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOYcM1z5fTs

    HILLARY 08

    Hillary Documentary
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOYcM1z5fTs

    HILLARY 08

    Hillary Documentary
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOYcM1z5fTs

    HILLARY 08
    Hillary Documentary
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOYcM1z5fTs

    HILLARY 08

  • Posted By: ka78 @ 01/07/2008 4:27:30 PM

    Comment: whoops... sorry for the double post. I didn't realize the first post worked since I had to sign up / log in first.

  • Posted By: ka78 @ 01/07/2008 4:23:46 PM

    Comment: I'm not a Richardson supporter but I feel the need to fact check the fact checker who was wrong about Richardson's gas comment. He didn't say gas was 3.20, higher than ever. He said heating oil was. Unlike other parts of the country, heating oil is prevalent in NH as opposed to Natural Gas or propane.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Luxury stadiums are on the rise. A top seat can cost $150,000. Beer costs extra.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
VIEWPOINT

The vast majority of Americans are dissatisfied with the direction of the country. So who are the 10 percent who think everything is A-OK?

Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu