Mr. Samuelson, I usually have disagreed with you lately, but I couldn't agree more with you here. I went to a "Western Ivy" - not technically an Ivy League school, but one that routinely shows up right next to them in the rankings (literally), and I have to say, it was an overpriced experience full of GOD-awful teaching, at least as I understand it. It was a GREAT place to do research or to go to the amazing libraries, but it was also a great place for kids to skate by on the name and reputation of the school without educating themselves in mental, emotional, or spiritual depth, too. I mean, I had a bad experience and not everyone should judge my school by that, but at the same time, I ABSOLUTELY agree that the Ivies and other top-ranked schools are overrated right now, and will put the average student in crippling debt besides. Our educational system has become rife with name-brand arrogance and is not truly willing to confront the dominant issues of the day.
- 1
- 2
The Worthless Ivy League?
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
The explanation is probably simple. At most colleges, students can get a good education if they try. "An able student who attends a lower tier school can find able students to study with," write Dale and Krueger. Similarly, even elite schools have dimwits and deadbeats. Once you're in the job market, where you went to college may matter for a few years, early in your career. Companies don't know much about young employment candidates. A shiny credential (an Ivy League degree) may impress. But after that, what people can or can't do counts for more. Skills grow. Reputations emerge. Companies prefer the competent from Podunk to the incompetent from Princeton.
If you can't (or won't) take advantage of what Princeton offers, Princeton does no good. What students bring to college matters more than what colleges bring to students. The lesson has relevance beyond elite schools. As a society, we've peddled college as a cure for many ills. Society needs more skilled workers. So, send more students to college. College graduates earn much more than high-school graduates. So--to raise incomes--send more students to college. In that, we've succeeded. Perhaps three quarters of high-school graduates go to college, including community colleges.
But half or more don't finish. A new study from the Department of Education ("College for All?") reports that these students achieve only modest gains in skills and income. What determines who finishes? In another report, Clifford Adelman--a senior researcher at the Department of Education--finds that the most powerful factor is the difficulty of high-school courses. And the finding is strongest for black and Hispanic students. Not having enough money (inadequate financial aid) explains few dropouts. Tough courses do more than transmit genuine skills. They provide the experience--and instill the confidence--of completing something difficult.
How to motivate students to do their best? How to make high schools demanding while still engaging? How to transmit important values (discipline, resourcefulness, responsibility) to teenagers, caught in life's most muddled moment? These are hard questions for parents and society as a whole. If the answers were self-evident, we'd have already seized them. But going to college--even Harvard--is no shortcut.
© 1999
- 1
- 2









Discuss