SPONSORED BY:
IRAQ

The Protection Business

Thousands of Iraqis are joining forces with American troops to drive out insurgents. What it's costing the U.S.—and why it could become even more expensive in the years ahead.

Danfung Dennis / WpN for Newsweek
Concerned Local Citizens secure an outpost along with U.S. Army soldiers in Muqdadiya on Jan. 5, 2008.
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

In Iraq there are about 78,000 armed individuals dubbed Concerned Local Citizens (CLCs). Their jobs: to protect their fellow Iraqis, staff checkpoints and help rid the country of terrorists. They're also pulling down a collective $23.4 million monthly, at $10 a day each. Joining the United States to defeat Al Qaeda and assorted insurgents is a noble enough endeavor that carries considerable risk, but it is also a sizable business. And in a country where tribal allegiances are paramount and loyalty to outside entities fluid, the chance to make money and gain power--not national pride--may be the key drivers for the Iraqis' civic activities.

The seven provinces that comprise the U.S. military's Multinational Division--North have about 15,000 CLCs, meaning a monthly payroll of some $4.5 million. Here in troubled Diyala province, U.S. Army commanders work closely with 2,000 to 3,000 CLC members, conferring almost daily in sessions that seem remarkably like corporate meetings. CLC leaders talk mostly about salaries and the number of new members and supplies they need, doggedly trying to expand their resources and extend their reach. They regularly devote time to reporting perceived problems with other CLC outfits and fretting about excesses of rival leaders, who are often of a different tribe.

"They release [apprehended] terrorists after only a few hours," Jasim Taha Dhari Alawsi complains about another CLC leader in a meeting with Capt. Travis Batty of Bravo Company. He adds that once, when he handed over three suspected Al Qaeda operatives to the Americans, he was threatened by a different leader who thought he should have let them go. Worse, that leader wanted Alawsi to split money earmarked for water projects "50-50" with him. Finally, he reports, the man "is in touch with Al Qaeda in Iraq under the blanket."

Batty absorbs all this with equanimity, accustomed to the province's intertribal--and intratribal--jousting. In this area of northern Iraq, near Muqdadiyah, the Mahdawi clan, who are Sunnis, leads the CLCs.  In nearby Qizilja, the Timimi tribe, which is Shia, is in the ascendancy, under the leadership of the powerful Mahdi Hassan Attia, the local mukhtar (magistrate).

Batty suggests a joint meeting at his K-Wal combat outpost. "Can you get the sheiks to all come here so we can all talk together in a safe place?" he patiently asks Alawsi. But by then the man is on to his next request. He wants 10 boxes of ammunition for his CLCs' AK-47 rifles. "We don't have that kind of ammo," Batty responds. "We only get it when we go into a house and confiscate it." Batty and his fellow soldiers of Second Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment, use M-4 rifles.

The conversation soon returns to funding. "My brother has three sons who were killed by Al Qaeda," the CLC says. "Do you have some money I can give him?" Again, the answer is no. Next comes the news that a rival CLC leader received $5,000 from the Americans for refurbishing a school, but turned over only $3,000 to the headmaster. "In that case we will give the money directly to the headmaster in future," Batty says.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: rif2422 @ 07/08/2008 7:38:03 PM

    ouch you really messed up on that whole "surge thing not working"..... You can apologize here or just email me... Thanks

    George W. and General "Betray Us"

  • Posted By: rif2422 @ 07/08/2008 7:37:45 PM

    ouch you really messed up on that whole "surge thing not working"..... You can apologize here or just email me... Thanks

    George W. and General "Betray Us"

  • Posted By: Bill Washienko @ 05/02/2008 3:04:46 AM

    Page 1 of 8

    Before the war in Iraq started, and after my own research, I determined that we would not find 400 tons of anthrax or 400 tons of VX gas or weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Nor would we find Al-Qaeda in Iraq of such a sufficient nexus to have considered them a threat to us. There was never any credible evidence put forth to support this military action. I could provide a laundry list of examples, but that is for another time, Suffice it to say, there was just as much evidence contravening any evidence supporting the notion that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction as there was supposedly the truthful kind. Who in America had first-hand knowledge of whether Saddam had WMD? When people suggest that one needs to be in Iraq to fully know what is going on there, I always bring up the fact that no American was over there to find out if Saddam had WMD, except for Scott Ritter, who was a U.N. weapons inspector and went on untold inspections. He stated, prior to the war, that Saddam had no WMD. Did every American rely upon the words of the only American that had been over there to determine whether Saddam had WMD? The answer is a resounding: no. Why not?

    Certainly, relying upon the information from the Iraqi National Congress and Chalabi was not the appropriate thing to do. I mean, according to what I have read, and in my opinion, if you relied upon the information from the Iraqi National Congress and Chalabi then you might as well have been relying upon evidence given to us by the Iranians. The same people who are providing IED???s to Iraqis that are killing our great soldiers in Iraq. Furthermore, did not the country of Jordan convict Chalabi, in abstentia, for embezzling money from the people and banks of Jordan? So, an American would rely upon the word of Chalabi and not the word of an American, who had first-hand knowledge regarding the potentiality of Saddam having WMD? There is a recent book about Chalabi on the bookshelves that should be read, particularly by those of you who supported the war in Iraq. It will shed some light on some things that I understood before the war was commenced. Read it. It is enlightening.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now