The Protection Business
Later, at a clinic in Muqdadiyah, Capt. Christopher Blaha, commander of Blackfoot Company, learns that some CLCs are thinking about quitting because they have not been paid. Aides of CLC leader Abu Abdel al Rahman inform him that their group consists of 71 CLCs and that Rahman has had to pay them less than $300 a month to make the money stretch. Blaha, a blunter personality than Batty, says the budget covers 40 people and that either some CLCs will have to be dropped or the larger contingent will have to accept permanently lower wages.
Eager to impart some good news, the aides report that some area residents have been coming back to live and that 400 families are poised to return. Buoyed by the news, Blaha says he will see what he can do about the extra number of CLCs. "Get their names and towns," he instructs. "Take their names and we will run them past the mukhtar." Turning from his hosts, Blaha explains that the Army must run candidates through a database to make sure they're not Al Qaeda or Qaeda supporters. "Not recently, anyway," he adds dryly.
In fact it is virtually impossible to be sure all CLC recruits have Qaeda-free resumes. Many have had some kind of connection with Al Qaeda in Iraq, even if it just a relative being a member of the terrorist group. At the CLC meeting, Blaha says he has heard there is a significant Qaeda presence in Babylon. "Definitely," responds Rahman. "The leaders have fake names, but if I go to Babylon I can tell who they are." Based on that identification, the Americans will have cause to detain the suspects or at least question them further. Blaha is happy for the CLCs' assistance, but warns again that there is no budget for an "infinite" number of CLCs.
"We cannot have CLCs and Iraqi police in houses for much longer," he says to the Arab interpreter. "That's not a way to secure an area, by occupying people's homes. And any more checkpoints will make it impossible to drive down the road. They can't keep getting more and more CLCs. They have to find other ways to live. We cannot hire all the men in the city to protect the city. They ought to be doing other things--doing different work, encouraging people to reopen shops. It cannot be that 'my whole town's economy is securing itself'."
Rahman, clearly a canny politician, says, "We want to make sure nothing happens. We don't want Al Qaeda to come back again. And we are the first target because we are protecting the country."
It is an argument that, for the moment, trumps all else. U.S. forces need the concerned local citizens now. But what happens with them in the future is a matter of considerable concern to the central government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki. Baghdad is nervous about the prospect of thousands of Sunnis and Shias scattered around the country after the Americans leave, armed with modern weapons, obsessed with their own agendas and led by powerful, charismatic and ambitious men.
"[Rahman's] tribe, the Mahdawis, have a history of fighting for Al Qaeda," says one Army official who does not want his name used given the sensitivity of the issue. "But they have earned trust by not promoting violence." However, he continued, "They're setting themselves up for power in the future and they're looking for money and weapons. But for now they are out there getting shot at and they're pretty courageous in all this fighting." Indeed, there are clear signs that the insurgents are now targeting those known to be CLC members: several severed heads belonging to those working with American forces have been dumped around Diyala.


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: rif2422 @ 07/08/2008 7:38:03 PM
Comment: ouch you really messed up on that whole "surge thing not working"..... You can apologize here or just email me... Thanks
George W. and General "Betray Us"
Posted By: rif2422 @ 07/08/2008 7:37:45 PM
Comment: ouch you really messed up on that whole "surge thing not working"..... You can apologize here or just email me... Thanks
George W. and General "Betray Us"
Posted By: Bill Washienko @ 05/02/2008 3:04:46 AM
Comment: Page 1 of 8
Before the war in Iraq started, and after my own research, I determined that we would not find 400 tons of anthrax or 400 tons of VX gas or weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Nor would we find Al-Qaeda in Iraq of such a sufficient nexus to have considered them a threat to us. There was never any credible evidence put forth to support this military action. I could provide a laundry list of examples, but that is for another time, Suffice it to say, there was just as much evidence contravening any evidence supporting the notion that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction as there was supposedly the truthful kind. Who in America had first-hand knowledge of whether Saddam had WMD? When people suggest that one needs to be in Iraq to fully know what is going on there, I always bring up the fact that no American was over there to find out if Saddam had WMD, except for Scott Ritter, who was a U.N. weapons inspector and went on untold inspections. He stated, prior to the war, that Saddam had no WMD. Did every American rely upon the words of the only American that had been over there to determine whether Saddam had WMD? The answer is a resounding: no. Why not?
Certainly, relying upon the information from the Iraqi National Congress and Chalabi was not the appropriate thing to do. I mean, according to what I have read, and in my opinion, if you relied upon the information from the Iraqi National Congress and Chalabi then you might as well have been relying upon evidence given to us by the Iranians. The same people who are providing IED???s to Iraqis that are killing our great soldiers in Iraq. Furthermore, did not the country of Jordan convict Chalabi, in abstentia, for embezzling money from the people and banks of Jordan? So, an American would rely upon the word of Chalabi and not the word of an American, who had first-hand knowledge regarding the potentiality of Saddam having WMD? There is a recent book about Chalabi on the bookshelves that should be read, particularly by those of you who supported the war in Iraq. It will shed some light on some things that I understood before the war was commenced. Read it. It is enlightening.