Predicting Your Medical Future | Newsweek Health for Life

A Guide to Predicting Your Medical Future

NEWSWEEK

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

SPONSORED BY

Flexible sigmoidoscopy: A sigmoidoscope is shorter than a colonoscope; it allows the doctor to see bleeding, inflammation, abnormal growths and ulcers in the lower third of the colon. Unfortunately, it can't reach the other two thirds. "Flexible sigs" should be performed once every five years.

Barium enema: This X-ray examination of the large intestine has some downsides: it's less precise than colonoscopy, and the USPSTF says there's "no direct evidence" that it reduces mortality rates. Nonetheless, if given every five years, it's acceptable in place of a colonoscopy.

Fecal occult blood test: This screen, given annually, is a subject of some debate. The USPSTF says there is "good evidence" that it reduces mortality from colorectal cancer. But King, along with many other docs, disagrees: "It doesn't tell us very much. By the time there's blood in the stool, it's too late." Your own doctor can help you decide if the FOBT is right for you.

Virtual colonoscopy: It's less unpleasant than colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and enemas, but it still requires what for many is the worst part: the clean-out. It's also no substitute: it doesn't work as well.

Other cancer screens: The short version: unless you have a family history, don't bother. The USPSTF recommends against widespread screening for pancreatic cancer, which is rare. It also recommends against bladder-cancer screens, which pick up false positives. The agency says the evidence is unclear for several other types of cancer.

Nonfasting total blood cholesterol: It's common for women to skimp on this test. But they shouldn't after menopause, when their risk of heart disease "rapidly approaches that of a man," says King. Get checked at 50 and every five years after, no matter what sex you are.

« Prev Page

Did you know that if McCain is elected you will have to pay income tax on the value of the medical insurance that your employer gives you? Worse still, he is offering a tax break for people who pay their own insurance, BUT only $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families.

Let's say you have a family of four. Your insurance policy costs would be at least $1,500-2,500 per month under a self-pay plan, which cost more than employer group plans. So, you pay $18,000 -$30,000 per year for insurance, and you get to deduct only $5,000 of that. If you paid $25,000 for you insurance, you would be out of pocket $20,000 per year. This is FAR WORSE than the current system, where if you are self employed you can deduct 100% of you medical insurance costs.

So, if you're not self employed, you would stick with your Employer's plan. Employer plans for a family of four have a value of $900-$1,500 per month totaling 10,800-$18,000 per year. Surprise! On April 15th, you owe tax on all of that as INCOME to you. Say your bracket is 25%, and the value of your Employer medical plan is $14,000. You will OWE THE IRS an additional $3,500, and that's ON TOP of whatever monthly premium you already pay to your employer for your insurance.

Many analysts say that McCain's new rules would encourage employers to stop offering health benefits. If that happened, then far fewer Americans would be insured than are insured today, because what family of four can afford $18,000-$30,000 out of pocket per year for self-pay health insurance?

Furthermore, McCain's plan does not require insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions of people who self-pay their insurance. People under employer group plans have all of their pre-existing conditions covered. This is a hugely unfair aspect of the current system. Insurance companies can afford to cover the pre-existing conditions of the much larger pool of people with group insurance, but they refuse to pay the pre-existing conditions on the smaller pool of self-pay customers. They have been allowed to price gouge the self-pay customers, which is a form of market manipulation that should be illegal.

So let's say one of your kids had diabetes and you have high blood pressure, then your employer stops offering insurance. You now have to buy your own, but you and your child are INELIGIBLE due to pre-existing conditions. Oh, yeah, they will let you buy the insurance, but you can't use it for any pre-existing condition until you have paid on time every month for two years. And you know what happens at one year and 11 months? You get a letter saying your policy has been cancelled. I have many patients this has happened to.

McCain's plan SUCKS.

It does nothing to help middle class working Americans afford or obtain medical insurance. In fact, it makes the current system WORSE.

Member Comments

- Reply
- Report Abuse
Posted By: edcmfood @ 08/03/2008 10:31:49 PM

Nins @- Where are you getting your information from? I'd like to read further
- Reply
- Report Abuse
Posted By: Nins @ 07/07/2008 12:03:57 AM

Did you know that if McCain is elected you will have to pay income tax on the value of the medical insurance that your employer gives you? Worse still, he is offering a tax break for people who pay their own insurance, BUT only $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families.

Let's say you have a family of four. Your insurance policy costs would be at least $1,500-2,500 per month under a self-pay plan, which cost more than employer group plans. So, you pay $18,000 -$30,000 per year for insurance, and you get to deduct only $5,000 of that. If you paid $25,000 for you insurance, you would be out of pocket $20,000 per year. This is FAR WORSE than the current system, where if you are self employed you can deduct 100% of you medical insurance costs.

So, if you're not self employed, you would stick with your Employer's plan. Employer plans for a family of four have a value of $900-$1,500 per month totaling 10,800-$18,000 per year. Surprise! On April 15th, you owe tax on all of that as INCOME to you. Say your bracket is 25%, and the value of your Employer medical plan is $14,000. You will OWE THE IRS an additional $3,500, and that's ON TOP of whatever monthly premium you already pay to your employer for your insurance.

Many analysts say that McCain's new rules would encourage employers to stop offering health benefits. If that happened, then far fewer Americans would be insured than are insured today, because what family of four can afford $18,000-$30,000 out of pocket per year for self-pay health insurance?

Furthermore, McCain's plan does not require insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions of people who self-pay their insurance. People under employer group plans have all of their pre-existing conditions covered. This is a hugely unfair aspect of the current system. Insurance companies can afford to cover the pre-existing conditions of the much larger pool of people with group insurance, but they refuse to pay the pre-existing conditions on the smaller pool of self-pay customers. They have been allowed to price gouge the self-pay customers, which is a form of market manipulation that should be illegal.

So let's say one of your kids had diabetes and you have high blood pressure, then your employer stops offering insurance. You now have to buy your own, but you and your child are INELIGIBLE due to pre-existing conditions. Oh, yeah, they will let you buy the insurance, but you can't use it for any pre-existing condition until you have paid on time every month for two years. And you know what happens at one year and 11 months? You get a letter saying your policy has been cancelled. I have many patients this has happened to.

McCain's plan SUCKS.

It does nothing to help middle class working Americans afford or obtain medical insurance. In fact, it makes the current system WORSE.
- Reply
- Report Abuse
Posted By: hek293 @ 05/21/2008 4:47:00 AM

Nope - thank god for abortion!