SPONSORED BY:
X17online.com
Wide-eyed: Britney was hauled away on a stretcher

What’s Next for Britney?

A prominent Los Angeles family law attorney on how child custody decisions are made when a mother is in distress—and why the Spears case is not that unusual in family court.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

A story that began as a tabloid tease about a wild young celebrity on the town is continuing to devolve into the kind of tragic spectacle that prompts more winces than winks. On Monday a Los Angeles judge will again be called upon to review the sad details of the Britney Spearschild custody case.

Early in January a clearly distraught Spears was taken from her home by ambulance after a visit with her two sons turned into a chaotic scene that prompted a court-appointed monitor to call the authorities. Spears ended up in the hospital for psychological evaluation, though she signed herself out after a one-night stay. Now Spears's ex-husband Kevin Federline is apparently ready to request a change to the current custody agreement, which gives her limited and supervised access to their children.

NEWSWEEK's Susanna Schrobsdorff spoke to Karen C. Freitas, a prominent family law attorney with Cotkin & Collins in Los Angeles, about how the courts handle cases when a mother is in chronic distress, what Spears would likely have to do to regain access to her toddlers, and why her situation isn't that unusual in family court. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: Is it likely that Britney Spears will lose even supervised access to her children—at least in the short term?
Karen C. Freitas: Unfortunately for Britney, the other side doesn't have to do much. She's handing [Kevin] Federline his case. It's not as though the court has a difficult decision.  Federline doesn't have to be Superdad. By law, if someone is not physically or emotionally available to parent, they have to grant custody to the other parent. And she has not followed the standard protocol to regain custody.

What would that protocol be?
As attorneys, we'd say you have to show the judge that you're working on your problems—whether they be an eating disorder, drugs or alcohol or some sort of condition like panic attacks or a mental illness. You must show that you're under a physician's care, that you're doing what you need to do to try and get better. That shows you're a responsible parent.

So the fact that Spears or any other parent might have serious emotional or substance problems does not disqualify them from custody or access?
No. It's the lack of redress. It's the poor judgment and irresponsibility in not addressing your issues. If you as an adult aren't taking care of yourself and are not physically or mentally available, obviously you can't take care of young children.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: bradpitt2008 @ 07/18/2008 3:03:28 PM

    She needs to get her head checked again - at least Kfed doesn't endanger the kids.
    Here's a game plan for Brit - get her sister and her mother and star in a new movie - I suggest a remake of Deep Throat.
    They are all whack jobs

  • Posted By: topsy crett @ 07/18/2008 12:30:11 PM

    Britney is a bad mother, bad mother, how can u drop ur child more than once first time is an accident yes but second no,i agree that the law as no right to take a child but brit ur a bad mother.

  • Posted By: teresataylor @ 04/27/2008 10:24:35 AM

    Britney Spears made the biggest mistake of her life when she married Kevin Federline. He got her into drugs and alcohol. we have a responsiblity to each others as humans. She thought she would be a "grown up" and mistakenly assumed she could "handle" a mature relationship, in the world she WAS in it included the man having more than one girlfriend. The druge he gave her messed up her self esteem. Yet the ocurt does not once address HIS issues with womanizing and drugs and alcohol. Didn't he drug he into believing she was going to be okay with his womanizing ways???Anyone who has ever done Coke knows what it can do. Shame on California, shame on Federline, and I sicnerely hope she gets better soon. Abuse isnt easy to overcome. YES, he abused her. Whats more is this country continues the abuse. ANY female whose family securtiy is threatened will suffer panic disorder, and that is all it is about. Built in mechanism. Everyone needs to support her, and the court needs to give the children to her parents in the meantime, and she needs to get herslef together and stop drinking away he pain, and to begin to learn to rely on her REAL accomplishments for her sefl esteem issues. She HAS A LOT to be proud of, way more than Federline. Screw the world who expects her to be everything THEY WISH THEY COULD BE!!! She IS perfect. She doesnt need to live up to anyones expectations, and certianly not that of people who would kill her for a slcie of bread, or a chicken wing.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now